(2004). Hydraulic Evaluation and Testing of Iranian Made Center Pivot Irrigation System. , 5(2), 27-48.
. "Hydraulic Evaluation and Testing of Iranian Made Center Pivot Irrigation System". , 5, 2, 2004, 27-48.
(2004). 'Hydraulic Evaluation and Testing of Iranian Made Center Pivot Irrigation System', , 5(2), pp. 27-48.
Hydraulic Evaluation and Testing of Iranian Made Center Pivot Irrigation System. , 2004; 5(2): 27-48.

Hydraulic Evaluation and Testing of Iranian Made Center Pivot Irrigation System

تحقیقات مهندسی صنایع غذایی
Article 3, Volume 5, Issue 2, January 0, Pages 27-48    PDF (1015.01 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
Abstract
Center pivot irrigation system is used as a modern irrigation method in different parts of Iran. Unfortunately due to lack of proper design and hydraulic shortcomings of the system in several agricultural lands in Iran, the efficiency of the center pivot irrigation system is low or unacceptable. Low system efficiency results in non-uniformity of water distribution along the lateral and on the cultivated land. This non-uniformity also causes ponding of water on the cultivated land and run off from the field. Above problems and initially large investment required by the system would make the evaluation of the system during the operation a necessary task. The main objective of this research is the hydraulic evaluation of the center pivot irrigation system located in the agricultural land in the College of Agriculture of Shiraz University in Badjgah, and also determining the uniformity parameters such as CU, DU, AELQ, and PELQ.  Field tests were conducted using ASAE standard procedure. The results show that the uniformity of water distribution obtained from the catch cans were not similar to the uniformity of the soil moisture content. It was also found that the average values of the distribution uniformity (DU), coefficient of uniformity (CU), actual efficiency of low quarter (AELQ), and potential application efficiency of low quarter (PELQ) were 0.63, 0.75, 0.55, and 0.55 respectively. Based on these results and according to the ASAE standards, these values are low, indicating that the system is not properly designed or this system is not suitable for this area. Equal values of AELQ and PELQ shows that in all cases during growing season the soil moisture deficit (SMD) was higher than the low quarter value (LQ). This means the irrigation depth was not sufficient and the crop was in stress during growing season. Electromotor damaged due to lack of metal cover and lack of proper design of electromotor adjacent nozzels were the main technical problems for the system.
Keywords
Center pivot; Evaluation; Hydraulics; Sprinkler Irrigation
References

1-     دادگر، م.، پرهامی، ج. و کیاء الحسینی، م. م. 1354. ارزیابی سیستمهای مختلف آبیاری بارانی. مرکز بررسیهای مهندسی زراعی کرج.

2-     سهرابی، ت. و اصیل منش، ر. 1379. مقایسه فنی روش آبیاری بارانی (سنترپیوت) با روش آبیاری شیاری. مجله علوم کشاورزی ایران. جلدی 21. شماره 2.

3-     سهرابی، ت. 1375. ارزیابی عملکرد سیستم آبیاری بارانی عقربه‎ای. مجموعه مقالات هشتمین سمینار کمیته ملی آبیاری و زهکشی. انتشارات وزارت نیرو. 147-129.

4-     میر لطیفی، م. و باغانی، ج. 1375. بررسی تغییر ارتفاع آبپاش بر تلفات تبخیر و بادزدگی در سیستم آبیاری دوار مرکزی. ششمین سمینار سراسری آبیاری و کاهش تبخیر. دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان. دانشکده کشاورزی.

5-        ASAE Standards 41st ed. 1994.  S436. Test procedures for determining the uniformity of water distribution of center pivot and moving lateral irrigation machines equipped with spray or sprinkler nozzels. ASAE. Trans. 754-755.

6-        Bralts, V. F., Pandey, S. R. and Miller, A. 1994. Energy savings and irrigation performance of a modified center pivot  irrigation system. Appl. Eng. Agric. 10 (1): 27-36.

7-        Christiansen, J. E. 1942. Irrigation by sprinking. Univ. of Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 670. 124P.

8-         Chu, S. T., and Moe. D. L. 1972. Hydraulic of center pivot system. ASAE. Trans.
15: 5, 894-896.

9-        Fangmeier, D. D., Vlotman W. F. and Eftekharzadeh. S. 1990. Uniformity of lepa irrigation systems with furrow drops. ASAE. Tran. 33: 6, 1907-1912.    

10-    Guy, F., and Leoon. N. 1998. Getting the most from center-pivot. Internet paper. 7372.1650@compuserve.com.

11-    Hansen, B. R., Orloff. S. B. 1996. Rotator nozzeles more uniform than spray nozzeles on center pivot sprinklers. Calif. Agri. 50: 1, 32-35.

12-    Hansen, B. R., Wallender. W. W. 1986. Bidirectional uniformity of water applied by continuous-move sprinkler machines. ASAE Trans. 29: 4, 1047-1053.

13-    Heerman, D. F., Duke, H. R., Serafim, A. M. and Dawson, L. J. 1992. Distribution functions to represent center pivot water distribution. ASAE. Trans. 35: 5, 1465-1472.

14-    Jensen, M. E. 1983. Design and operation of farm irrigation system. ASAE. Monograph. 719-760.

15-    Keller, J. and R. D. Bliesner. 1990. Sprinkler and Trickle Irrigation. Published by Van Nastrand Reinhold, N. Y. p, 652. 

16-    Merriam, J. L., and Keller. J. 1978. Farm irrigation system evaluation: A guide for management.  Utah State Unive. Utah. p.271.

17-    Merriam, J. L., Shearer, M. and Bort, C. M. 1983. Evaluation of Irrigation Systems and Practices. In : Jensen  M. E. (ed) Design and operation of farm irrigation system. pp: 719-760. ASAE. Monog.

18-    Roland, L. 1982. Mechanized sprinkler irrigation: FAO irrigation and drainage.
No. 35, P. 409.

19-    Stone, K. C., Stonsell. J. R. and Yong, J. R. 1994. Insecticide distribution through an irrigated corn canopy. Trans. ASAE. 37: 1, 135-138.  

20-    Tarjuelo, J. M., Montero, J., Honrubia, F. T., Ortiz, J. J. and Ortega, J. F. 1999. Analysis of uniformity of sprinkle irrigation in a semi-arid area. Agric. Water Manage. 40, 315-331.

Statistics
Article View: 1,382
PDF Download: 1,047


counter
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb