Related Links
Comparison microbial and physicochemical characterization of different origin plant honeys in Esfahan province | ||
| تحقیقات دامپزشکی و فرآورده‌های بیولوژیک | ||
| Editorial, Volume 26, Issue 3, September 2013, Pages 23-30 PDF (412.84 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/vj.2013.101020 | ||
| Authors | ||
| L Lakzadeh* 1; H.R Gheisari2; A.H Mahianeh3 | ||
| 1Member of Scientific Board, Food Technology, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza Branch | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Food Hygiene, Shiraz Veterinary University | ||
| 3Member of Scientific Board, Fisheries Applied and Vocational Education Center, Bousher | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Honey is an important product of honey bee that rich in carbohydrate. Compounds of honey in each area are different due to weather conditions, type of plants, bee species and management methods. Honey quality and effective factors on it can be determined by microbial and physicochemical tests in each area and the producers of fine honey will be supported. In this way, the research has been done on 44 honey samples to consider the type of plants that bees generally feed on it. The results showed that samples have good quality and type of plants influence on honey purity. Range of humidity was seen between 15/64- 18.66 percent in Astragalus-lucern and Astragalus samples. Fructose and Glucose had been formed between 60-80% of honey carbohydrates and maximum ratio of them is reported in Lotus honey (1.7). Minimum amount of hydroxyl methyl furfural was in Dill honey, Minimum amount of free acidity and greatest amount diastase activity were seen in Coriander honey (19/84). These results indicate that the samples of honey were freshness and suitable storage & processing methods have had after production. Sulfite - reducing bacteria were not seen in honeys and Numbers of yeast and fungi were < 102 CFU/g that these conform to 92 Iranian standards, which Numbers of yeasts and fungi, are maximum 102 CFU/g and sulfite- reducing bacteria are zero. | ||
| References | ||
|
1- استاندارد ملی ایران شماره 92 (1383) عسل- ویژگی ها و روش های آزمون)تجدید نظر ششم.## 2- بنی طالبی، ا.، حسینی س.ش. و بنی طالبی. ا. (1383) بررسی آزمایشگاهی تقلبات در عسل های عرضه شده در شهرستان شهرکرد، همایش کشوری بهداشت و ایمنی غذا، یزد، کتابچه خلاصه مقالات، ص 170## 3- قیصری، ح. و حمیدیان شیرازی. ا. (1387) مقایسه و ارزیابی خصوصیات فیزیکوشیمیایی و تقلبات عسل های منطقه شیراز تولید شده در فصول مختلف، مجله پژوهش های علوم و صنایع غذایی ایران 4 :57 -69## 4- جاهد خانیکی، غ. و کامکار. ا. (1384) بررسی خواص فیزیکوشیمیایی عسل تولیدی شهر گرمسار در سال 1382، فصلنامه علوم و صنایع غذایی ایران دورة 1، 4 :35-41## 5- عبادی، ر.، و احمدی. ع. (1383) پرورش زنبور عسل. انتشارات اردکان، اصفهان.## 6- Ajlouni, S., and Sujirapinyokul, P. (2010) Hydroxy methyl furfuraldehyde and amylase contents in Australian honey. Food Chemistry. Vol, 119, pp: 1000–1005.##
7- Anupama, D., Bhat, K.K. and V.K. Sapna. (2003) Sensory and physico-chemical properties of commercial samples of honey. Food Research International. Vol, 36, pp: 183–191.##
8- Blasa, M., Candiracci, M. Accorsi, A. Piacentini, M.P. Albertini, M.C. and Piatti, E. (2006) Raw millefiori honey is packed full of antioxidants. Food Chemistry. Vol, 97, pp: 217–222.##
9- DeRodriguez, G.O., DeFerrerFerrer, B.S.A. and Rodriguez, B. (2004) Characterization of honey produced in Venezuela. Food Chemistry. Vol, 84,pp: 499–502.##
10- Ferreira, I.C.F.R., Aires, E. Barreira, J.C.M. and Estevinho, L.M. (2009) Antioxidant activity of Portuguese honey samples: Different contributions of the entire honey and phenolic extract. Food Chemistry. Vol, 114, pp: 1438–1443.##
11- Finola, M.S., Lasagno, M.C. and Marioli, J.M. (2007) Microbiological and chemical characterization of honey from central Argentina. Food chemistry. Vol, 100, pp:1649-1653.##
12- Gomes, S., Dias, L.G. Moreira, L.L. Rodrigues P. and Estevinho. L. (2009) Physicochemical, microbiological and antimicrobial properties of commercial honeys from Portugal. Food and Chemical Toxicology.##
13- Guerrini, A., Bruni, R. Maietti, S. Poli, F. Rossi, D. Paganetto, G. Muzzoli, M. Scalvenzi, L. and Sacchetti, G. (2009) Ecuadorian stingless bee (Meliponinae) honey: A chemical and functional profile of an ancient health product. Food Chemistry. Vol, 114, pp:1413–1420.##
14- Guler, A., Bakan, A. Nisbet, C. and Yavuz, O. (2007) Determination of important biochemical properties of honey to discriminate pure and adulterated honey with sucrose (Saccharum officinarum L.) syrup. Food Chemistry. Vol, 105, pp: 1119–1125.##
15- Kayacier, A., and Karaman, S. (2007) Rhological and some physicochemical characteristics of selected Turkish honeys. Journal of Texture Studies, Vol, 39, pp: 17-27.##
16- Nanda, V., Sarkar, B.C. Sharma, H.K. and Bawa, A.S. (2003) Physico-chemical properties and estimation of mineral content in honey produced from different plants in Northern India. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, Vol, 16, pp: 613–619.##
17- Mussatto, S.I., and Mancilha, I.M. (2007) Non-digestible oligosaccharides: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers. Vol, 68, pp: 587–597.##
18- Serrano, S., Villarejo, M. Espejo, R. and Jodral, M. (2004) Chemical and physical parameters of Andalusian honey: classification of Citrus and Eucalyptus honeys by discriminant analysis. Food Chemistry, Vol, 87, pp: 619–625.##
19- Terraba, A., Diez, M.J. and Heredia, F.J. (2002) Characterisation of Moroccan unifloral honeys by their physicochemical characteristics. Food Chemistry. Vol, 79, pp: 373–379.##
20- White, J.W.Jr. (1979) Methods for determining carbohydrates, hydroxyl methyl furfural and proline in honey: Collaborative study. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Vol, 62, pp: 509–514.##
21- White, J.W.Jr. (1994) The role of HMF and diastase assays in honey quality evaluation. Bee World. Vol, 75, No, 3, pp: 104–117.## | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,481 PDF Download: 3,538 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb