Related Links
Soil Water Balance, Sowing Date and Wheat Yield Using AquaCrop Model under Rainfed and Limited Irrigation | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی سازه های آبیاری و زهکشی | ||
| Article 4, Volume 14, Issue 4, January 2016, Pages 41-56 PDF (771.36 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/aridse.2014.102099 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Simulation models of the effect of water on crop yield are valuable tools for improving on-farm water management and water productivity. The AquaCrop model has recently been developed by the FAO to predict crop productivity, net water requirements, and water use efficiency for different scenarios, including rainfed and limited irrigation. The model is suitable for evaluating different regions and crops. The present research examined the efficiency of the AquaCrop model for simulating yield, soil moisture content, and crop canopy response to water availability for wheat in rainfed areas. The region under study in Iran was the upper Karkheh River basin in the Selseleh region of Lorestan province during 2005-2007. The on-farm trials included three irrigation treatments (rainfed, single irrigation only at planting time, single irrigation only in spring). To evaluate the model performance and accuracy of prediction, maximum error, normalized root mean square error, and index of agreement were computed from observed and simulated variables (grain yield, soil moisture content, evapotranspiration). The reliability index of normalized RMSE was 8.34% to 10.56% and of efficiency was 0.78 to 0.93. This indicates that the model was able to accurately simulate soil water content of the root zone, grain yield, and crop canopy under research conditions when compared with field data. The d-statistic indicates that the closer the index value is to unity, the better the agreement between the two variables compared and vice versa. The AquaCrop model for estimation of sowing date under rainfed conditions was not efficient because it required a minimum value for precipitation. The model performed satisfactorily for simulation of grain yield, soil water content, and crop canopy for the rainfed and limited irrigation treatments. The AquaCrop requires minimal input data that is readily available or can easily be collected, making it a user-friendly option for users. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| AquaCrop Model; Crop canopy; Single irrigation; Transpiration; Water Productivity | ||
| References | ||
|
Alizadeh, H. A., Nazari, B., Parsinejad, M., Ramezani-Eetedali, H. and Janbaz, H. R. 2010. Evaluation of AquaCrop model on wheat deficit irrigation in Karaj area. Iranian J. Irrig. Drain. 2(4): 273-283. (in Farsi) Andarzian, B., Bannayan, M., Steduto, P., Mazraeh, H., Barati, M. E., Barati, M. A. and Rahnama, A. 2011. Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran. Agric. Water Manag. 100 (1): 1-8.
Anon. 2009. The ETo Calculator. The ETo Calculator Evapotranspiration from a Reference Surface. Reference Manual. Version 3.1. FAO. Rome. Italy.
Anon. 2010. AquaCrop-The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water. Ver. 3.1.
Araya, A., Keesstra, S. D. and Stroosnijder, L. 2010. Simulating yield response to water of Teff (Eragrostis tef) with FAO’s AquaCrop model. Field Crop. Res. 116, 196-204.
Babazadeh, H. and Sarai-Tabrizi, M. 2012. Assessment of AquaCrop model under soybean deficit irrigation management condition. J. Water Soil. 26(3): 329-339. (in Farsi)
Bradford, K. J. and Hsiao, T. C. 1982. Physiological Responses to Moderate Water Stress. In: Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B. and Ziegler, H. (Eds.) Physiological Plant Ecology. II. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. New Series. Vol. 12B. Sprimger-Verlag, New York. 263-324. Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A. H. 1979. Yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage. Paper No. 33. FAO. Rome. Italy.
Eitzinger, J., Trnka, M., Hösch, J., Žalud, Z. and Dubrovský, M. 2004. Comparison of CERES, WOFOST and SWAP models in simulating soil water content during growing season under different soil conditions. Ecol. Modell. 171, 223-246.
Farahani, H. J., Izzi, G., Steduto, P. and Oweis, T. Y. 2009. Parameterization and evaluation of AquaCrop for full and deficit irrigated cotton. Agron. J. 101, 469-476.
Garcia-Vila, M., Fereres, E., Mateos, L., Orgaz, F. and Steduto, P. 2009. Deficit irrigation optimization of cotton with AquaCrop. Agron. J. 101, 477- 487.
Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Miranda, R., Cusicanqui, J. A., Taboada, C., Mendoza, J., Huanca, R., Mamani, A., Condori, O., Mamani, J., Morales, B., Osco, V. and Steduto, P. 2009. Simulating yield response to water of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) with FAO-AquaCrop. Agron. J. 101, 499-508. Hanks, R. J. 1983. Yield and Water-Use Relationships. In:Lange, O. L., Kappen, L. and Schulze, E. D. (Eds.) Ecological Studies. Analysis and Synthesis. Vol. 19. Water and Plant Life. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.
Heng, L. K., Evett, S. R., Howell, T. A. and Hsiao, T. C. 2009. Calibration and testing of FAO AquaCrop model for maize in several locations. Agron. J. 101, 488-498.
Hsiao, T. C., Fereres, E., Acevedo, E. and Henderson, D. W. 1976. Water Stress and Dynamics of Growth and Yield of Crop Plants. In: Lange, O. L., Kappen, L. and Schulze, E. D. (Eds.) Ecological Studies. Analysis and Synthesis. Vol. 19. Water and Plant Life. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 281-305.
Hsiao, T. C., Heng, L. K., Steduto, P., Raes, D. and Fereres, E. 2009. AquaCrop-Model parameterization and testing for maize. Agron. J. 101, 448-459.
Loague, K. and Green, R. E. 1991. Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application. J. Contam. Hydrol. 7, 51-73.
Raes, D. 2002. BUDGET, A Soil Water znd Salt Balance Model. Reference Manual. Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences Institute for Land and Water Management. Belgium.
Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C. and Fereres, E. 2006. Structure, algorithms and functionalities of the FAO crop-water productivity model AquaCrop. International Symposium on Water and Land Management for Sustainable Irrigated Agriculture. April 4-8. Adana. Turkey.
Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C. and Fereres, E. 2009. AquaCrop-The FAO crop model for predicting yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and soft ware description. Agron. J. 101, 438-447.
Ramezani-Etedali, H., Nazari, B., Tavakoli, A. R. and Parsinejad, M. 2009. Evaluation of CROPWAT model in deficit irrigation management of wheat and barley in Karaj. J. Water Soil. 23(1): 119-129. (in Farsi)
Salemi, H. R., Soom, M. A. M., Lee, T. S., Mousavi, S. F., Ganji, A. and Yusoff, M. K. 2011. Application of AquaCrop model in deficit irrigation management of winter wheat in arid region. African J. Agric. Res. 610, 2204-2215.
Singh, A. K., Tripathy, R. and Chopra, U. K. 2008. Evaluation of CERES-wheat and CropSyst models for water-nitrogen interactions in wheat crop. Agric. Water Manag. 95, 776-786.
Smith, M. 1992. CROPWAT, A computer program for irrigation planning and management. FAO. Irrigation and Drainage. Paper No. 46. FAO. Rome.
Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C. and Fereres, E. 2007. On the conservative behavior of biomass water productivity. Irrig. Sci. 25, 189-207.
Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Raes, D. and Fereres, E. 2009. AquaCrop-The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. Agron. J. 101, 426-437.
Tanner, C. B. and Sinclair, T. R. 1983. Efficient Water Use in Crop Production: Research or Re-Search? In: Taylor, H. M., Jordan, W. R. and Sinclair, T. R. (Eds.) Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. ASA, CSSA and SSSA. Madison. WI.
Tavakoli, A. R., Oweis, T., Ashrafi, Sh., Asadi, H., Siadat, H. and Liaghat, A. 2010. Improving rainwater productivity with supplemental irrigation in upper Karkheh river basin of Iran. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA). Aleppo. Syria.
Vaux, H. J. Jr. and Pruitt, W. O. 1983. Crop-water production functions. Adv. Irrig. 2, 61-97.
Willmott, C. J. 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (SAUO). 63, 1309-1313. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,253 PDF Download: 4,094 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb