Related Links
Economic Analysis of Soil Carbon Sequestration Capability in the National Bamou Park, Fars Province | ||
| پژوهش های آبخیزداری | ||
| Article 8, Volume 36, Issue 4 - Serial Number 141, January 2024, Pages 98-113 PDF (1.79 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/wmrj.2023.360369.1496 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Roham Rahmani* 1; Seyed Hamid Mesbah2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 2Research Instructor of soil Conservation and Watershed management Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Introduction Carbon dioxide gas, produced from fossil fuels in industrial centres and near big cities, has a significant effect on climate change and global warming. Sequestration of carbon in plants and soil of protected areas, especially national natural parks, is the simplest and most economical way to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide. The National Bamou Park, with an area of 46,913 hectares near the industrial centres of Shiraz, Zarghan, Maroodasht and Abbarik, provided a good chance for carbon sequestration. In this research economic analysis of this park's soil carbon sequestration capability in 2022 was done. Materials and Methods Based on vegetation cover and geomorphological conditions, 20 and 5 locations inside and outside the park were selected for sampling. Composite soil samples were taken from the 25 profiles with a depth of 30 cm length and width of 20 cm. The Wallcly-Black method was used to determine the percentage of soil organic carbon in the laboratory. The economic evaluation of the sequestered carbon was done using the damage cost avoided method at three levels: low estimate based on the values of trade in the Prototype Carbon Fund, medium estimate based on anticipated values in the future European Union carbon trading scheme and high estimate based on the damage cost assessment made by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Results Based on the results, the average measures of carbon sequestered in the soil of the lands inside and outside the park were 40.05 and 21.75 tons per hectare, respectively. Based on the t-test, the average carbon sequestered inside and outside the park significantly differs at 1%. The average economic value of avoided damage related to carbon sequestration per hectare of land inside the park at low, medium and high levels are 123.12, 410.41 and 3283.26 million rials, respectively. The corresponding amounts outside the park are 66.86, 222.88 and 1783.04 million rials. The average economic value of sequestered carbon in the soil of each hectare of land inside and outside the park, based on the t-test, has a significant difference at the level of 1%. Conclusions and Recommendations The suitable conditions of vegetation and soil of Bamou National Park have caused this park to have a high economic value because of the environmental services of carbon sequestration in the soil and absorption of carbon dioxide gas. Thus, it is possible the economic value of such services is considered in financial calculations, and all or part of it is allocated for the protection and expansion of these parks. An important point about the economic value of the parks and forest ecosystems services is the possibility of buying and selling carbon sequestered or carbon dioxide gas emitted into the atmosphere. For this purpose, it is suggested to pay attention to the legal frameworks and necessary infrastructures for creating an applied market of carbon sequestration and carbon dioxide emission at the national and regional levels. In addition, concerning the natural resources of Fars province and the criteria of international climate change agreements, it is possible to use foreign capital to help create and expand national parks and forest ecosystems as greenhouse gas reservoirs. Therefore, it is suggested to use these legal agreements to attract credit from international organizations. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Carbon sequestration; damage cost avoided method; Fars; national Bamou park; soil | ||
| References | ||
|
Asgari HR, Savarolya M, Yeganeh H, Honardoust F, Mombeni M. 2021. Effects of grazing exclusure on some soil properties, and carbon sequestration estimating the economic value of (Case study: Arid Rangelands North of Gonbadkavous). Degradation and Rehabilitation of Natural Land. 2(3):1–11. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27174425.1400.2.3.2.2. (In Persian). Badehian Z, Mansouri M, Fakhari MA .2018. Determining the economic value of carbon sequestration in the soil in the planted afforested different species. Environmental Researches. 17(9):111-120. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20089597.1397.9.17.15.2. (In Persian). Bihamta MR, Zare Chahouki MA. 2011. Principles of statistics for the natural resources science. Tehran University Press. ISBN 978-964-03-5812-2. pp. 121-216. (In Persian). Bordbar SK. 2005. Study the potential of carbon storage in the Eucalyptus and Acacia planted forestry’s of Fars Province. Ph.D. Thesis, Sciences and Research’s Unit, Islamic Azad University. 154 p. (In Persian). Brown S. 2002. Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges, Environmental Pollution. 116(3):363-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00212-3. De Jong BHJ, Tipper R, Montoya–Gomez G. 2000. An economic analysis of the potential for carbon sequestration by forests: evidence from southern Mexico, Ecological Economics. 33(2):313 – 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00162-7. Deng S, Shi, Y, Jin, Y, Wang L. 2011. A GIS-based approach for quantifying and mapping carbon sink and stock values of forest ecosystem: A case study. Energy Procedia. 5:1535-1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.263. Dixon RK, Schroeder PE, Winjum JK. 1991. Assessment of promising forest management practices and technologies for enhancing the coservation and sequestration of atmosferic carbon and their costs at the site level. EPA/600/3-91/067, US-EPA, Washington D.C. pp. 1-153. Dixon RK, Sathaye JA, Meyers SP, Masera OR, Makarov AA, Toure S, Makundi W, Wiel S. 1996. Greenhouse gas mitigation strategies: Preliminary results from the US country studies program. Ambio. 25:26-32. Environmental Protection Organization of Iran. 2002. Bamou national park management plan, identification of lands resources. 65 p. (In Persian). Environmental Protection Organization of Iran. 2002. Bamou national park management plan, air and climate. 110 p. (In Persian). Farajzadeh Z. 2018. Emission tax in Iran: Incorporating pollution disutility in a welfare analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production. 186:618-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.093. Fars meteorological bureau. 2022. https://www.farsmet.ir. (In Persian). Frouzeh M. 2006. Study of soil carbon sequestration and stand biomass of dominant shrub species in the flood spreading area of Gerbaygan Fasa, M.Sc. Thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 76 p. (In Persian). Https://www.tgju.org/profile/price_dollar_rl/charts. Hussainzad EA, MohdYusof MJ. 2020. Assessing the economic value of carbon sequestration in Taman Negra Pahang, Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science. https://WWW.researchgate.net/Publication/343451491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/540/1/012058. Mahmoudi M, Ramezani Kakroudi E, Shafiei AB, Salehi A, Pato M, Hoseinzadeh O. 2022. Estimation of Carbon Storage in Biomass and Litter in Plantations of Lavizan Forest Park in Tehran. Ecology of Iranian Forests. 10(20):204–214. (In Persian). Mesbah H. 2013. Comparison on carbon sequestration of soil and dominant plant species in inside and outside of Bamoo national park, Final report of research project, S/N:44148, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, 47 p. (In Persian). Masera OR, Bellon MR, Segura G.1995. Forest management options for sequestering carbon in Mexico. Biomass and Bioenergy. 8 (15):357-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(95)00028-3. Nasri M, Ghorbani M, Azarnivand H, Rafiee H. 2016. Economic valuation of stocked carbon function in arid and semi-arid rangelands (Case study: Malard district). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research. 23(2):396–403. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2016.107040. Nelson DW, Sommers LD. 1986. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter, In: Page, A.L. (ED.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd Edition, Agronomy Series No. 9, ASA SSSA, Madison. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.frontmatter. Niknahad Gharemakher H, Aghtabye A, Akbarlou M. 2018. Effects of grazing exclusure on some soil properties, erodibility and carbon sequestration (Case study: Bozdaghin rangelands, North Khorasan, Iran). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research. 24(4):708–718. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2017.114058. (In Persian). Pache RG, Abrudan IV, Nita MD. 2021. Economic evaluation of carbon storage and sequestration in Retezat national park, Romania. Forests. 12(43):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12010043. Parry I, Veung C, Heine D. 2014. How much carbon pricing is in countries’ own interests? The critical role of co-benefits. International Monetary Fund. pp. 1-36. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp14174.pdf. Rajabi V .2011. Estimation of carbon sequestration in two mountain Almond and Mo plants and study the possibility of recalibration of carbon sequestration simulations; Case study Hossein Abad Station. M.Sc. Thesis, college of agriculture, Shiraz University. 119 p. (In Persian). Sathaye J, Ravindranah NH. 1997. Policies, measures and the monitoring needs of forest sector carbon mitigation, Mitigation Adaptation Strategies Global Change. 2(2–3):101–115. DOI: 10.1007/BF02437198. Sayyadiyan K, Beheshti AA .2007. Carbon Sequestration Systems. Razi University Publications. pp. 1-176. (In Persian). Selivanon E, Hlavackova P. 2021. Methods for monetary valuation of ecosystem services: A scoping review, Journal of Forest Science. 67(11):499-511. DOI: 10.17221/96/2021-JFS. Soleimanipour SS, Adeli K, Mofi-Gholami D, Naghavi H. 2022. Economic evaluation of carbon sequestration in Zagros Oak forests (Case study: The Pahnus forest habitat, Chaharmahal Bakhtiari Province). Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation. 10(20):185–206. (In Persian). United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2000. Carbon sequestration in the decertified rangelands of Hossain Abad, Through community based management program coordination.7 p.United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCC) .2016. The Paris agreement. Design and print: Phoenix Design Aid Denmark, pp. 1-60. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/PageNotFound.aspx. United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCC). 2022. Decisions taken at the Sharm El-Sheikh Climate Change Conference. pp. 1-49. https://unfccc.int/documents/626561. World Bank. 2004. Islamic Republic of Iran energy- environment Review Policy Note. Report No. 29062 – IR. Washington D.C. 33 p. Zapfack L, Noumi VN, Tabue Mabda RB. 2016. Economic estimation of carbon storage and sequestration as ecosystem services of protected areas: A case study of Lebeke national park. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 28(4):406–415. Zarafshar M, Rousta MJ, Matinizadeh M, Bordbar SK, Enayati K, Kooch Y, Nehgahdarsaber M, Abbasi A. 2021. Comparison of carbon and nitrogen sequestration in soils under plantations, natural forest and agricultural farm land uses in arjan plain in the Fars province. Ecology of Iranian Forests. 8(16):165–172. (In Persian). | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 303 PDF Download: 565 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb