Karami, A., Ahmadvand, M., asimeh, M. (2023). Assessment of the Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Watershed Management Plan from the Perspective of the Villagers of Garmabad Watershed Basin in Fars Province. , 26(2), 51-78. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.357724.1442
A. Karami; M/ Ahmadvand; M. asimeh. "Assessment of the Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Watershed Management Plan from the Perspective of the Villagers of Garmabad Watershed Basin in Fars Province". , 26, 2, 2023, 51-78. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.357724.1442
Karami, A., Ahmadvand, M., asimeh, M. (2023). 'Assessment of the Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Watershed Management Plan from the Perspective of the Villagers of Garmabad Watershed Basin in Fars Province', , 26(2), pp. 51-78. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.357724.1442
Karami, A., Ahmadvand, M., asimeh, M. Assessment of the Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Watershed Management Plan from the Perspective of the Villagers of Garmabad Watershed Basin in Fars Province. , 2023; 26(2): 51-78. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.357724.1442

Assessment of the Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Watershed Management Plan from the Perspective of the Villagers of Garmabad Watershed Basin in Fars Province

روستا و توسعه
Article 3, Volume 26, Issue 2 - Serial Number 102, November 2023, Pages 51-78    PDF (435.95 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.30490/rvt.2023.357724.1442
Authors
A. Karami* 1; M/ Ahmadvand2; M. asimeh3
1Associate Professor, Rural Development Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran.
2Professor, Rural Development Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran.
3PhD Student in Agricultural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran.
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
It is an undeniable principle that any activity done by humans on nature has effects on nature. In fact, these effects are a perspective of human activities and knowing them can show the strengths and weaknesses of programs. Therefore, specifying the type of changes, the factors involved in it and the consequences arising from it can have a significant impact on the better management of the programs and as a result reducing the negative consequences resulting from it and ultimately the successful implementation and stabilization of the programs. Therefore, the aim of the current research was to investigate the social, economic and environmental effects of the Garmabad village watershed project from the perspective of the watershed residents of this area in order to provide a suitable basis for the development of the project by evaluating the effects of the project and preparing and compiling basic solutions.
Materials and Methods
This research was a survey-based one. The statistical population of the study included all household heads (N=895) in Garmabad village located in Marvdasht county of Fars province, out of which 112 people were selected as the statistical sample by simple random sampling method. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire within which the face validity was confirmed based on the opinions of a number of subject-matter experts and its reliability was obtained by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for different parts of the questionnaire (0.65-0.84). The questionnaire consisted of two parts, in the first part, using 50 items in the form of a five-level Likert scale, the perception of the residents of the region about the effects (economic, social and environmental) of the watershed project was investigated, while the second part was allocated to investigate the personal and professional characteristics respondents. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS software. Some methods of descriptive statistics (such as frequency, mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (such as exploratory factor analysis) were used to analyze the data.
Results and Discussion
The results of factor analysis showed that in the field of environmental effects, four categories of factors such as creating a beautiful landscape and improving of infrastructure, controlling erosion and increasing the pasture area, rainfall productivity, and flood control and improving the village health status were able to explain 67.88% of variance of the effects of the environmental impacts. As a result of implementing the watershed plan with flood control, preventing soil erosion, sedimentation, increasing the area of pastures and vegetation, increasing underground water and wells, increasing water quality, etc., the productivity of water and soil has increased. Therefore, considering the arid and semi-arid conditions of the country and the importance of these two important factors on sustainable development, especially in rural areas, the attention of the government and the authorities for more investments and more principled policies in the field of implementation and comprehensive management of natural resources projects is essential for optimal use of water and soil.
In the economic field, five factors including increasing the amount and the level of production, reducing production costs, increasing ownership and assets, increasing credits and rural development, and employment and income generation were the most important economic factors of the watershed management plan, which explained 71.80% of the variance in total. The results of this study show that the implementation of this plan has been able to solve the economic problems of the villagers to a large extent by increasing the amount of production and reducing production costs, increasing job opportunities, etc. Therefore, since the implementation of this project has been evaluated positively in improving the welfare of the villagers, it is better to develop this operation in villages that have the conditions to implement these projects.
In the social field, the five factors including participation and cooperation, community stabilization, awareness improvement, institutional pursuit, and cultural exchange were able to explain 69.56% of the variance. According to the results obtained with the implementation of the project, the solidarity and interaction between the people of the village has increased and a suitable ground has been provided for cultural exchanges and tourism development. Therefore, it can be acknowledged that the success of any project depends on social and cultural issues in addition to technical and executive issues, and people's active participation is very effective, especially in watershed management projects.
Conclusions
The results of this research generally show that the watershed project had many positive effects on the studied area. Therefore, in order to improve the project, it is recommended to take advantage of the capabilities of local communities and stakeholders in this context, and it is effective to consider the interests of the beneficiaries in designing and implementing the plan, using their local knowledge, using the influence of local leaders to attract the participation of villagers, etc.
Keywords
Assessment of Impacts; Watershed Management Plan; Watershed Basin; Garmabad; Fars Province
References
  1. Asiabi Hir. R., Mostafazadeh, R., Raoof, M. & Esmali Ouri, A. (2020). Evaluating surface water sustainability of Ardabil province watersheds. Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management. 11(4), 984-998. [In Persian]
  2. Asimeh, M. & Nooripoor, M. (2018). Factors affecting the adoption of innovations: The case of Safflower in Bandamir district. Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 10(3), 63-72. [In Persian]
  3. Bagherian, R., Rezaee, J., Broshke, A., Kalat, A.B., Jafari, A. & Raahimi, H. (2014). Evaluation of socio economic impacts of flood water spreading projects among neighboring villages. Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 3(9), 39-45. [In Persian]
  4. Cattell, R. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. The American Journal of Psychology. 58(1), 69.
  5. Chen, W., Wu, S. Lei, Y. & Li, Sh. (2017). China’s water footprint by province, and inter-provincial transfer of virtual water. Ecological Indicators, 74, 321–333.
  6. Dadrasi Sabzevar. A., Ghazanchian, A. & Namaki, M. (2016). The factors analysis of information, related to socio-economic effects ‎of watershed management activities, according to the villagers point ‎of view of Gosh watershed of Mashhad. Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, 8(3), 290-302. [In Persian]
  7. Department of Natural Resources & Watershed Management of Marvdasht County. (2021). Introduction of Garmabad Fars watershed. Unpublished Report. [In Persian]
  8. Drasana, A. (2002). Impacts of watershed management projects in Madagascar, (Case study of Tsiazompaniry area). Journal of Forests & Water, 1, 123-136.
  9. Esteves, A.M., Franks, D. & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 34-42.
  10. Fealy Nahavand, S. & Rasouli Azar, S. (2017). Socio-economic and environmental impacts of the watershed management projects in Mahabad's dam catchment. Journal of Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 5(18), 25-32. [In Persian]
  11. Gohari, A., Eslamian, S., Mirchi, A., Abedi-Koupaei, J., Massah Bavani, A. & Madani, M. (2013). Water transfer as a solution to water shortage: A fix that can backfire. Journal of Hydrology, 491, 23–39.
  12. Goli, I., Azadi, H., Nooripoor, M., Baig, M.B., Viira, A.H., Ajtai, I. & Özgüven, A.I. (2021). Evaluating the productivity of paddy water resources through SWOT analysis: The case of northern Iran. Water, 13(21), 2964.
  13. Gondwe, B.R.N., Merediz-Alonso, G. & Bauer-Gottwein, P. (2011). The influence of conceptual model uncertainty on management decisions for a groundwater-dependent ecosystem in Karst. Journal of Hydrology, 400(1-2), 24-40.
  14. Hasani, H. & Maleki, M. (2020). Socio-economic evaluation of watershed plans on the watershed residents (Case study: Hasanabdal Basin-Zanjan province). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 11(21), 143-153. [In Persian]
  15. Hayati, A. & Bazrafshan, A. (2015). Assessing the socio-economic effects of watershed management measures case study: Bushkan Bushehr basin. National Conference on Future Research, Humanities and Development, Shiraz. [In Persian]
  16. International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA). (2003). Social Impact Assessment: International Principles.
  17. Izadi, F. (2018). Investigating the effects of urban agriculture patterns in improving local economic development (LED) case study 14 region in Tehran. Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Art (M.A) in urban and regional planning. Department of Urban and Regional Planning Faculty of Art and Architecture Tarbiyat Modares University. [In Persian]
  18. Jamali, A. & Raeesi, N. (2015). Socio-economic evaluation of watershed mechanical projects in Matesang watershed-Nikshahr. Watershed Engineering and Management, 7(3), 331-340. [In Persian]
  19. Kaiser, H.F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
  20. Kalantari, Kh. (2010). Data processing and analysis in social and economic research. Tehran: Farhange Saba. [In Persian]
  21. Khodayi, H., Asadi, A. & Amani, F. (2020). Analyzing the implementation obstacles of rural guide plans in rural areas of Tabriz county in Iran. Village and Development, 23(1), 151-173. [In Persian]
  22. Lashanizand, M., Payamani, K. & Vyskarami, E. (2015). Investigating actual schema in agricultural using water surface, case study: Honam watershed. Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, 6(4), 400-406. [In Persian]
  23. Madadi, E. & Maleki, M. (2018). Socio-economic impact assessment of the implemented natural resource projects from the stakeholders perspectives (Case study: Watershed Ardabil-Khalkhal city). Journal of Rangeland, 12(3), 267-280. [In Persian]
  24. Maleki, M., Dehghani Bidgoli, R. & Ghane Moghadam, R. (2018). Investigating the effects of natural resources and watershed management plans implemented with the participation of field operators in rural development (Case study: Ghareshiran basin of the Nir city of Ardebil province). Journal of Rural Development Strategies, 5(3), 347-362. [In Persian]
  25. Maleki, R., Nooripoor, M., Azadi, H. & Lebailly, P. (2018). Vulnerability assessment of rural households to Urmia Lake drying (The case of Shabestar region). Sustainability, 10(6), 1862.
  26. Maleki, R., Nooripoor, M., Sharifi, Z. & Petrescu, D.C. (2023). Application of community‐based system dynamics for the management of rural households' vulnerability to the drying of Urmia Lake. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 4(3), 573-585.
  27. Moghaddasi, N., Sheikh, V.B. & Najafinejad, A. (2015). Qualitative evaluation of watershed management projects using descriptive-correlation method (Case study: Boostan dam watershed). Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 22(2), 205-218. [In Persian]
  28. Mondal, B., Patil, S.L., Loganandhan, N., Reddy, K.K. & Channabasappa, K. (2010). Assessment of Mastihalla watershed in Bellary district of Karnataka state." India. Annals of Arid Zone, 49(1), 9-15.
  29. Mosaffaie, J. & Salehpour Jam, A. (2018). Economic assessment of the investment in soil and water conservation projects of watershed management. Arab journal of Geosciences, 11(14), 368.
  30. Murray, S.J., Foster, P.N. & Prentice, I.C. (2012). Future global water resources with respect to climate change and water withdrawals as estimated by a dynamic global vegetation model. Journal of Hydrology, 448/449, 14–29.
  31. Nasrabadi, A. Karami, E. & Ahmadvand, M. (2013). Determinants of participation in watershed development projects in Khorasan, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 15(6), 1085-1094.
  32. Ninan, K.N. & Lakshmikanthamma, S. (2001). Social cost-benefit analysis of a watershed development project in Karnataka, India. Ambio, 30, 157-161.
  33. Radwan, A. (1999). Flood analysis and mitigation for an area in Jordan. Journal of Water Resources and Management, 125(3), 170-177.
  34. Sánchez, L.E. & Saunders, M. (2011). Learning about knowledge management for improving environmental impact assessment in a government agency: The western Australian experience. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(9), 2260-2271.
  35. Steiger, J.H. (2017). Exploratory factor analysis with R. Available at: http://www.statpower.net/Content/312/R%20Stuff/Exploratory%20Factor%20Analysis%20with%20R.pdf.
  36. Tesfahunegn, G.B. & Ayuk, E.T. (2021). Opportunities and challenges to adopting sustainable watershed management interventions: An overview of experiences from Ethiopia. A nexus approach for sustainable development, 165-183. DOI:1007/978-3-030-57530-4_11
  37. Vanclay, F. (2004). The triple bottom line and impact assessment: How do TBL, EIA, SIA, SEA and EMS relate to each other. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 6(3), 265-288.
  38. Zare, Sh. & Hayati, D. (2015). Environmental, social, and economic impacts of modern irrigation and drainage networks in Korbal plain and their determinants as perceived by beneficiaries. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture. 29(3), 379-395. [In Persian]
  39. Zebardast, E. (2017). Exploratory factor analysis in urban and regional planning. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 22(2), 5-18. [In Persian]
  40. Zhou, Q., Yang, Sh., Zhao, Ch., Cai, M., Lou, L., Luo, Y. & Hou, L. (2016). Development and implementation of a spatial unit non-overlapping water stress index for water scarcity evaluation with a moderate spatial resolution. Ecological Indicators, 69, 422–433.
Statistics
Article View: 430
PDF Download: 180


counter
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb