Related Links
Estimation of crop water requirement and actual evapotranspiration using satellite images to improve volumetric water delivery in irrigation and drainage networks (case study: Mahabad irrigation and drainage network, West Azerbaijan province | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی سازه های آبیاری و زهکشی | ||
| Volume 24, Issue 93, June 2024, Pages 42-23 PDF (2.51 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/idser.2024.363930.1566 | ||
| Authors | ||
| amir nourjou* 1; Farid Feizolahpour2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Agricultural Engineering Research Department, West Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Urmia, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Extended Abstract Introduction Due to the location of Iran in arid and semi-arid regions and according to the quantitative and qualitative limitations of water resources, optimal management and volumetric delivery of water is important in irrigation and drainage networks. In this regard, it is necessary to estimate the water requirement of crops accurately and to provide adequate water to farmers. Remote sensing technology provides facilities that can be used to obtain different layers of information at the lowest cost in the fastest time. Accordingly, many researchers have used remote sensing data to monitor vegetation cover, provide land use maps, estimate crop evapotranspiration and have declared this technology as appropriate tool for such studies. Based on the previous studies, it is observed that low researches has been conducted to investigate the crop evapotranspiration considering the crop water requirement. Therefore, the most important aims of this study are as follows: providing the cropping pattern and land use maps using Sentinel 2 satellite images, determination of the water requirement for the delivery points of irrigation network, determination of the actual evapotranspiration of the crop cover using SEBAL algorithm and Landsat 8’s images, and evaluation of the water supply and management in the Mahabad irrigation and drainage network. Methodology In order to determine the cropping pattern of the Mahabad irrigation and drainage network, Sentinel 2 images have been used related to the 2018-2019 cropping year. The images were examined in terms of the region of syudy and the percentage of cloudiness and after selecting the appropriate images, pre-processing operations including radiometric and atmospheric corrections were applied on them. Then, the NDVI index was calculated based on selected images. After determination of the classes, the phenological cycle of crops were examined for each class and spectral pattern of crops was determined during the growing season. Training samples were selected for supervised classification using the existing maps, Google Earth images, creating images with false color composites and considering the growth pattern and some of them were also considered for validation of the classified map. Then, the cropping pattern map was obtained by using the SVM classification algorithm. After generating the crop classification map, the water requirement of the different classes was determined based on the Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration method, applying plant coefficients and irrigation application efficiency at the volumetric water delivery points. Finally, the actual evapotranspiration rate of the study area calculated based on the SEBAL algorithm and compared with the net water requirement map. Results and Discussion Based on the results, kappa coefficient and overall accuracy of the classified map were determined to be 0.953 and 91%, respectively. The area of the planted agricultural farms was equal to 10594 hectares and 1576 hectares of farms were without planting. The area of orchard farms was equal to 6786 hectares and the area of sugar beet, wheat, alfalfa and corn lands were 998, 1839, 693 and 278 hectares, respectively. Thus, the net irrigation water requirement was equal to 71 million cubic meters and the gross irrigation water requirement was calculated equal to 161.36 million cubic meters, considering the irrigation efficiency of 44%. On the other hand, the evaluation of the SEBAL evapotranspiration maps during the growing season indicated that the total amount of evapotranspiration was equal to 79.78 million cubic meters, and this amount was 14% higher than the net irrigation water requirement. Finally, according to the crop classification map and based on the comparison of the net irrigation water requirement and evapotranspiration maps, the water consumption in the Mahabad irrigation and drainage network was evaluated. It turned out that in the upstream farms of the network or close to the Mahabad River, the Water consumption was more than net water requirement and downstream areas were faced to deficit irrigation due to lack of sufficient water. Conclusions Based on the results of this study, it was observed that by using the capabilities of satellite images and remote sensing, it is possible to monitor and evaluate the condition of agricultural farms on a large scale with acceptable accuracy. Also it is possible to improve the management of water supply and water use efficiency in irrigation and drainage networks by creating up-to-date land use maps, determining net and gross irrigation water requirement and comparing with actual evapotranspiration maps. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Crop Pattern; Plant Phenology Cycle; SEBAL; Deficit Irrigation; Support Vector Machine | ||
| References | ||
|
Abbaszadeh Tehrani, N., Beheshtifar, M. & Morabbi, M. (2011). Estimation of cropping area in Qazvin province with IRS-LISS III multi-timed images application. Environmental Researches, 2(3), 87-96.
Akbari, M. (2013). Estimation of cultivar density using satellite data. Journal of water research in agriculture, 27(1), 77-88.
Allen, R.G., Tasumi, M., Trezza, R., Waters, R., Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., 2002. Surface Energy Balance Algorithms for Land, Advance Training and Users Manual–Idaho Implementation, Version 1.
Allen, R., Morse, A. & Tasumi, M. (2003). Application of SEBAL for western US water rights regulation and planning. ICID workshop on remote sensing of ET for large regions.
Ashourloo, D., Matkan, A., Bagheri, B. & Shahri, M. (2012). Extracting Wheat Biomass Using Satellite Data and Geographically Weighted Regression. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 104, 121–128.
Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., Menenti. M., Feddes, R.A. & Holtslag, A. A. M. (1998). A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL): 1) Formulation. Journal of Hydrology, 212 (213):213-229.
Carneiro, F. M., Furlani, C. E. A., Zerbato, C., de Menezes, P. C., da Silva Gírio, L. A. & de Oliveira, M. F. (2019). Comparison between vegetation indices for detecting spatial and temporal variabilities in soybean crop using canopy sensors: Precision Agriculture, 1-29.
Hsu, C.w., Chang, C. & Lin, C. (2003). A practical guide to support vector classification.
Khodakarami, L. & Soffianian, A. (2012). Application of Multi Temporal Remote Sensing for Precision Farming. J. Sci. & Technol. Agric. & Natur. Resour. Water and Soil Sciences, 16(59), 215–231. (in Persian)
Mirzaei Mossivand, A., Ghorbani, A. & Keivan Behjou, F. (2018). Land use/cover change detection using Landsat and IRS imagery: A case study, Khalkhal County. Geographic Space, 17(60), 101–116. (In Persian)
Mountrakis, G., Im, J. & Ogole, C. (2011). Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(3), 247–259.
Najafi, A., Azizi Ghalati, S. & Mokhtari, M.H. (2017). Assessment Kernel Support Vector Machines in Classification of Landuses (Case Study: Basin of Cheshmeh kileh-Chalkrod). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 8(15), 92–101.
Riahi, V., Zeaiean Firouzabadi, P., Azizpour, F. & Darouei, P. (2019). Identification and investigation of the area under cultivation in Lenjanat using Landsat 8 satellite images. Researches in Geographical Sciences, 19(52), 147–169.
Schultz, G. A. & Engman, E. T. (2012). Remote sensing in hydrology and water management. Springer Science & Business Media.
Soheylifar, Z., Mirlatifi, S.M., Naseri, A.A. & Assari, M. (2012). Estimating Actual Evapotranspiration of Sugarcane by Remote Sensing. (A Case Study: Mirza Kochakkhan SugarcaneAgro-Industry Company Farms). Water and Soil Science, 23(1), 151-163. (in Persian)
Tasumi, M., Trezza, R., Allen, R. G. & Wright, J. L. (2003). US Validation tests on the SEBAL model for evapotranspiration via satellite. In 2003 ICID Workshop on Remote Sensing of ET for Large Regions, Vol. 17.
Torahi, A., Firoozy Nejad, M. & Abdolkhani, A. (2017). Assessment support vector machine (SVM) algorithm and maximum likelihood to providing land use map of Riparian forest using OLI (Case Study: Maroon River – Behban. Iranian Remote Sensing & GIS. 9(1), 49–62.
Zhou, X., Zheng, H., Xu, X., He, J., Ge, X., Yao, X., Cheng, T., Zhu, Y., Cao, W. & Tian, Y. (2017). Predicting grain yield in rice using multi-temporal vegetation indices from UAV-based multispectral and digital imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 130, 246-255. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 195 PDF Download: 221 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb