Related Links
Determination of Volume and Mass of Lemons by Mechine Vision System | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی صنایع غذایی | ||
| Article 7, Volume 10, Issue 2, January 0, Pages 87-98 PDF (352 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Physical characteristics of agricultural products are the most important parameters in the design of grading, conveying, processing and packaging systems. Among these physical characteristics, volume, mass, projected area and center of gravity are the most important for sizing systems. In this study, the segmentation method was used to estimate lemon volume. A total of 50 randomly selected lemons were examined. The mechanized scanning system consisted of two CCD cameras, two capture cards, an appropriate lighting system and a personal computer. The cameras were arranged at right angles to each other to capture perpendicular images of the lemons. The estimated volume using this technique was compared to the actual volume of the lemons, measured by water displacement, using a paired t-test and the Bland-Altman approach. The estimated volume using the mechanized scanning method was not significantly different from that determined by water displacement (p> 0.05). The mean difference between water displacement and mechanized scanning was -0.06 cm3. The characterization results of the lemons showed that the computed volume and measured mass parameters were highly correlated, M = 0.8894V + 2.2757, with a coefficient of determination of 0.96. In conclusion, the mechanized scanning technique provides a simple and efficient methodology for estimating lemon volume and mass. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Lemon; Mass; Mechanized Scanning; Segmentation Method; Sizing; volume | ||
| References | ||
|
Abbasgholipour, M., Omid, M. and Borghei, A. M. 2006. Development of an efficient algorithm for grading raisins based on color features. Proceedings of International conferance on Innovations in Food and Bioprocess Technologies. Dec. 12-14. AIT. Thailand. 448-457.
Akar, R. and Aydin, C. 2005. Some physical properties of Gumbo fruit varieties. J. Food Eng. 66, 387-393.
Amiri Parian, J., Khoshtaghaza, M. H., Kabir, E. and Minaei, S. 2007. Volume estimation of potatoes using image processing. JAER. 8(4): 113-126. (in Farsi)
Aydine, C. and Musa Ozcan, M. 2007. Determination of nutritional and physical properties of myrtle (Myrtus Communis L.) fruit growing wild in Turkey. J. Food Eng. 79, 453-458.
Bailey, D. G., Mercer, K. A., Plaw, C., Ball, R. and Barraclough, H. 2004. High speed weight estimation by image analysis. In: Mukhopadhyay, S. C., Browne, R. F. and Gupta, G. S. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2004 New Zealand National Conference on Non Destructive Testing. July 27-29. Palmerston North. New Zealand. 89-96.
Bland, J. M. and Altman, D. G. 1999. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 8, 135-160.
Forbes, K. A. and Tattersfield, G. M. 1999. Estimating fruit volume from digital images. AFRICON. Cape Town: South Africa. IEEE(1): 107-112.
Hahn, F. and Sanchez, S. 2000. Carrot volume evaluation using imaging algorithms. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 75, 243-249.
Hall, A. J., McPherson, H. G., Crawford, R. A. and Seager, N. G. 1996. Using early season measurements to estimate fruit volume at harvest in kiwifruit. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 24, 379–391.
Jafari, A. A., Mohtasebi, S., Eghbali Jahromi, H. and Omid, M. 2006. Weed detection in sugar beet fields using machine vision. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 8(5): 602-605.
Koc, A. B. 2007. Determination of watermelon volume using ellipsoid approximation and image processing. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 45, 366-371.
Lee, W. S., Slaughter, D. C. and Giles, D. K. 1999. Robotic weed control system for tomatoes. Precision Agric. 1, 95-113.
Lorestani, A. N., Omid, M., Bagheri Shooraki, S., Borghei, A. M. and Tabatabaeefar, A. 2006. Design and evaluation of a fuzzy logic based decision support system for grading of Golden Delicious apples. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 8(4): 440-444.
Majumdar, S. and Jayas, D. S. 2000. Classification of cereal grains using machine vision: II- Color models. ASAE. 43(6): 1677-1680.
Ngouajio, M., Kirk, W. and Goldy, R. 2003. A simple model for rapid and nondestructive estimation of bell pepper fruit volume. Hortic. Sci. 38, 509-511.
Paliwal, J., Borhan, M. S. and Jayas, D. S. 2003. Classification of cereal grains using a flatbed scanner. ASAE. Paper No. 036103. St. Joseph. MI 49085-9659. USA.
Sabliov, C. M., Boldor, D., Keener, K. M. and Farkas, B. E. 2002. Image processing method to determine surface area and volume of axi-symmetric agricultural products. Int. J. Food Prop. 5, 641-653.
Safwat, M. and Moustafa, A. 1971. Theoretical prediction of volume, surface area, and center of gravity for agricultural products. Trans. ASAE. 14(2): 549-553.
Shahin, M. A. and Symons, S. J. 2001. A machine vision system for grading lentils. Canadian Biosys. Eng. 7, 7-14.
Shahin, M. A., Symons, S. J. and Meng, A. X. 2004. Seed Sizing with Image Analysis. ASAE. Paper No. 043121. St. Joseph. MI 49085-9659. USA.
Shigeta, K., Motonaga, Y., Kida, T. and Matsuo, M. 2004. Distinguishing damaged and undamaged chaff in rice whole crop silage by image processing. ASAE Annual Meeting. Paper No. 043125.
Szirtes, T. 2006. Applied Dimensional Analysis and Modeling. 2nd Ed. Elsevier Science & Technology Books. Butterworth Heinemann.
Tabatabaeefar, A. and Rajabipour, A. 2005. Modeling the mass of apples by its geometrical attributes. Scientia Hortic. 105, 373-382.
Wang, T. Y. and Nguang, S. K. 2007. Low cost sensor for volume and surface area computation of axi-symmetric agricultural products. J. Food Eng. 79, 870-877.
Wilhelm, L. R., Suter, D. A. and Brusewitz, G. H. 2005. Physical properties of food materials. Food Proc. Eng. Technol. ASAE. St. Joseph. MI 49085-9659. USA. 23-52.
Wright, M. E., Tappan, J. H., and Sistler, F. E. 1986. The size and shape of typical sweet potatoes. Trans. ASAE. 29(3): 678-682. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,866 PDF Download: 713 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb