Related Links
Investigation of Theileria annulata infection in slaughtered of native cows by two methods of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Microscopic examination | ||
| تحقیقات دامپزشکی و فرآوردههای بیولوژیک | ||
| Editorial, Volume 27, Issue 2, June 2014, Pages 65-69 PDF (1.01 M) | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/vj.2014.100993 | ||
| Authors | ||
| H.R Azizi1; M Aadel* 2; F.A Salehi2; A.R Safian2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor of Veterinary Faculty of Shahrekord University | ||
| 2Graduated of Veterinary Faculty of Shahrekord University | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In order to compare PCR technique with smear method to find out Theileria annulata in the cows carrier,cattle over one year was referred to the slaughter, samples were taken randomly since February 88 till May 89. We took blood from ear vein, then fixed with methanol & colored with gimsa at least we sarched for parasits under objective lenses (100x). Also for PCR,we took 9ml blood from jagular vein of each cows & added 1ml citrate buffer 3.2%, then sensed to biochemistry laboratory of Shahrekord University.From 140 samples by PCR technique:56 samples) 40%) were positive & 84 samples(60%) were negative. From 140 samples by smear method 12 samples (8.75%) were positive & 128 samples (91.43%) were negative. Comparison between PCR and detection of Asmer prepration method to detection of Theileria carrier cow, showed significant differences between two methods (P<0.005). According to the results obtained in this study, we understand that the sensitivity of PCR technique to diagnosis Theileria annulata carrier svery high compared to smears.Itis suggested that the epidemiological studies, and control measure be used. | ||
| References | ||
|
[ 1] Almeria, S., Gutierrez, J. F., Estrada, P. A., Ortuno, A., Ferrer, D. and Castella, J.
(2001). Bovine piroplasms in minorca (balearic islands, spain): A comparison of PCR-based and light microscopy detection, Vet, Parasitol, Vol , 20, No, 3 pp:249-259.
[2] D’oliveira, M., Vander, w. M., Miguel, A., Habela, M., Jacquiet, P. and Jongejan, F.(1995). Detection of Theileria annulata in blood samples of carrier Cattle by PCR, J, Clin, Microbiol, Vol , 33 No,10. pp: 2665-2669.
[3] Dumanli, N., Aktas, M., Cetinkaya, B., Cakmak, A., Koroglu, E., Saki, C. E., Erdogmus, Z., Nalbantoglu, S., Ongor, H., Simsek, S., Karahan, M. and Altay, K.( 2005). Prevalence and distribution of tropical theileriosis in eastern Turkey, Vet, Parasitol, Vol , 127 No,1. pp: 9-15.
[4] Hashemi, F. R. (1991). Chemotherapeutic value of paravaqoune and buparvaqoune against Theileria annulata infection of cattle, Res, Vet, Sci, Vol ,50. pp:204-207.
[5] Kirvar, E., Ilhan, T., Katzer, F., Hooshmand, R. P., Zweygarth, E., Gerstenberg, C., Phipps, P. and Brown, C. G. (2000). Detection of Theileria annulata in cattle and vector ticks by PCR, Parasitol, Vol , 120 No,3. pp:245-54.
[6] Martin, S. J.,Viseras, J., Adroher, F.J. and Garcia, F., P. (1999). Nested polymerase chain reaction for detection of Theileri annulata and comparison with conventional diagnostic techniques: its use in epidemiology studies, Parasitol, Res, Vol , 85, No,3. pp:243-245.
[7] Robinson, P. M.( 1982). Theileria annulata and it’s transmission: a review”, Trop, Anim, Health, Prod, Vol , 14. pp:3-12.
[8] Roy, K.C., Ray, D., Bansal, G.C. and Singh, R.K.( 2000). Detection of Theileria annulata carrier cattle by PCR, Indian, J, Exp, Biol, Vol , 38 No, 3). pp: 283-284. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 955 PDF Download: 1,458 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb