Related Links
The effects of Biomin containing probiotics and prebiotics on performance of broiler chickens and immune response against Newcastle vaccine | ||
| تحقیقات دامپزشکی و فرآوردههای بیولوژیک | ||
| Editorial, Volume 24, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages 36-41 PDF (448.31 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/vj.2011.101092 | ||
| Authors | ||
| A Zamani Moghaddam* 1; M Mayahi2; M Khosravi1; N Vakili2 | ||
| 1Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Shahre-Kord, Shahre-Kord, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Shahid Chamran, Ahvaz, Iran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Due to growing concerns about antibiotic resistance and the potential for a ban for antibiotic growth promoters, there is an increasing interest in finding alternatives to antibiotics in poultry production. Therefore probiotic bacterial or fungal origin used as alternatives to antibiotic growth stimuli.To determine the effects of Biomin (Biomin contains of Enterococcus faecium (a probiotic), Fructo-Oligosacharide(a peribiotic) and particles of immune stimulator, similar to cell wall particles) on immune response against Newcastle vaccine and performance of Ross 308 broiler chickens, 180 day-old broiler chicks were randomly allotted into three groups in four replicates. Groups 2 and 3 received 0.1% and 0.2 % Biomin respectively; Group 1 did not receive any Biomin in the diet. All groups received oil Newcastle vaccine at 9 days old. Other vaccination programs arranged based on local area. Blood samples were collected 4 times and HI tests were performed on serum samples of chickens. The performance of different groups during the breeding period was evaluated. In 14 days after vaccination with oil Newcastle vaccine between the group received 0.2 percent Biomin and control group significant difference was observed. Antibody titer against Newcastle in groups received Biomin in 19 and 29 days after vaccination were higher than control group. At 42 days of age, groups fed the diet containing Biomin had body weight significantly higher than control group. Results indicated that Biomin effects on increasing oil Newcastle vaccine induced immunity and improve body weight. | ||
| References | ||
|
1-بزرگمهری فرد، محمد حسن، (1364) بیماریهای طیور، عوارض تغذیهای، بیماریهای عفونی باکتریایی، بیماریهای عفونی ویروسی، انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی دانشگاه تهران، صفحات 326-305.## 2- میاحی، منصور، (1386) بیماریهای ویروسی پرندگان، انتشارات دانشگاه شهید چمران، صفحات 26-1. ## 3- Arzey GG., Pearce, M., (2001) NDV vaccination strategies in elite breeding and layer flocks. RIRDC Final Report, NSW Agriculture, ISBN 0734712901.##
4- Awad, w. A., Ghareeb, K., Nitch, S., Pasteiner, S., Abdel-Raheem, S. and Bohm, j. (2008) Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic, and symbiotic on the intestinal glucose absorption of broiler chicken. International journal of Poultry Sciences, 7: 689-691##
5- Awad, W. A., Ghareeb, K., Abel-Raheem, S. and Bohm, J. (2009) Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic, and symbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorfology of broiler chickens.Poultry Sciences, 88: 49-56.##
6- Akinley, S. B., Lyayi, A. and Afolabi, D. (2008) The performance, haematology and carcass traits of broilers as affected by diets supplemented with or without biomin a natural growth promotor . World of agricultural Science, 4: 467-470.##
7- Beltran R., Schatzmayr G., Klimitch A. (2005) Evaluation of a probiotic production on cecal coconization and organ invation of salmonella enteritidis in broilers, Australia poultry science symposium 17.##
8- Coetzer J.A.W. & Tustin R.C. E. (2004) Infectious Diseases of Livestock, 2nd Edition. OxfordUniversity Press.##
9- Dalloul, R.A., Lillehoj, H.S., Shellem, T.A., Doerr, J.A., (2003) Enhanced mucosal immunity against Eimeria acervulina in broilers fed a Lactobacillus-based probiotic. Poultry Science 82, 62–66.##
10- Eckert N. H., Lee J. T., Hyatt D., Stevens S. M., Anderson S., Anderson P. N. , Beltran R., Schatzmayr G., Mohnl M. and Caldwell D. J. (2010) Influence of probiotic administration by feed or water on growth parameters of broilers reared on medicated and nonmedicated diets, Poultry Science Association, 19:59-67.##
11- Jordan, F & Pattison, M. & Alexander, D. (2007) Poultry Diseases, Elsevier. ISBN-13 978-0-7020-2597-6; ISBN-10 0-7020-2597-6. Hardbound 584 pages.##
12- Mountzouris K. C., Tsirtsikos P., Kalamara E., Nitsch S., Schatzmayr G., Fegeros K. (2007) Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Probiotic Containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus Strains in Promoting Broiler Performance and Modulating Cecal Microflora Composition and Metabolic Activities, Poultry Science, 86:309-317.##
13- Musa, H.H., Wu, S.L., Zhu, C.H., Seri, H.I., Zhu, G.Q., (2009) The potential benefits of probiotics in animal production and health. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8, 313–321.##
14- office international des epizootic. (2000) Manual of standards forDiagnostic tests and vaccins, 4th edition. Pp: 221-231.##
15- Patterson, J.A., Burkholder, K.M., (2003) Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science 82, 627–631.##
16- Sirvydis v., Sabalionyte R., Bobiniene R., Gruzauskas R. (2003) Influence of phytogenic preparation,, Biomin P.E.P-1000" and flavomicin-80 on the changes of total albumen in the blood of the broiler chickens, VETERINARIJA IR ZOOTECHNIKA, 23:45. ##
17- Willis, W.L., Reid, L., (2008) Investigating the effects of dietary probiotic feeding regimens on broiler chicken production and Campylobacter jejuni presence. Poultry Science 87, 606–611.## | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,463 PDF Download: 756 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb