| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,944 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,229 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 43,869,940 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,377,147 |
پاسخ ژنوتییپهای مختلف پنبه نسبت به شوری خاک در استان گلستان | ||
| پژوهش های پنبه ایران | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 2، شماره 2، آبان 1393، صفحه 13-26 اصل مقاله (360.66 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijcr.2015.102021 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| قربانعلی روشنی* 1؛ عبدالرضا قرنجیکی2؛ سید جلال میرقاسمی3 | ||
| 1استادیار موسسه تحقیقات پنبه کشور | ||
| 2مربی موسسه تحقیقات پنبه کشور | ||
| 3محقق موسسه تحقیقات پنبه کشور | ||
| چکیده | ||
| شوری خاک یکی از عوامل مهم کاهش رشد و تولید محصولات زراعی است. سطح خاک‌های متاثر از نمک در کشور ما بسیار قابل توجه بوده و در اکثر این اراضی فقط کشت محصولات متحمل به شوری مثل پنبه مقدور میباشد. با این که پنبه نیز از گیاهان نسبتاً متحمل به شوری محسوب میشود، اما همانند سایر گیاهان با وجود تحمل نسبی در برابر شوری، تاثیر سوء شوری در ارقام و ژنوتیپهای مختلف یکسان نبوده و اختلاف در صفات رشدی و عملکرد مشاهده میشود. لذا، به منظور بررسی تاثیر شوری خاک بر صفات رشدی و مقایسه عملکرد 12 ژنوتیپ پنبه، آزمایشی در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی مزرعه نمونه انباراُلوم در استان گلستان انجام شد. شوری خاک در زمان کشت 5/12 دسیزیمنس بر متر بود. نتایج نشان داد که شوری خاک تاثیر معنیداری بر صفات رشدی و عملکرد شامل درصد جوانهزنی، ارتفاع بوته، وزن غوزه، عملکرد چین اول، عملکرد چین دوم، عملکرد کل و درصد زودرسی محصول دارد. بیشترین درصد جوانهزنی در ژنوتیپهای شیرپان 539، چوکوروا و کیو28 مشاهده شد. در مقایسه میانگین دادهها، رقم تجاری ساحل دارای بلندترین ارتفاع بوته و سنگینترین غوزه بود. هرچند در چین اول، ژنوتیپ شیرپان 539 بیشترین محصول را تولید نمود، اما با توجه به اختلاف قابل توجه محصول رقم گلستان در برداشت چین دوم، بیشترین عملکرد کل با رقم مذکور بدست آمد. زودرسی ژنوتیپ شیرپان 539 برتری زیادی نسبت به سایر ژنوتیپها داشت. با توجه به نتایج، ترویج و توسعه کشت رقم گلستان در خاک‌های متاثر از نمک استان گلستان توصیه میشود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| استان گلستان؛ شوری خاک؛ ژنوتیپهای پنبه؛ عملکرد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation and Comparison of Salinity Tolerance of Several Cotton Genotypes in a Saline Soil | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Gh. Roshani1؛ A. Gharanjiki2؛ S.J. Mirghasemi3 | ||
| 1Assistant Prof., Cotton Research Institute of Iran | ||
| 2Scientific Staff Member of Cotton Research Institute of Iran | ||
| 3Researcher of Cotton Research Institute of Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Soil salinity is one of the important factors that reduces growth and production of crops. The salt-affected soils area is very considerable in Iran so that salt tolerant crops individually are cultivable in the most these lands. Like as other plants, the adverse effect of salinity on various cultivars and genotypes of cotton weren't similar and despite the fact that cotton is somewhat tolerant to salinity, differences in growth traits and yield occurs. Hence, a field experiment was carried out in Golestan province, Agricultural Research Station, Marked Farm of Anbarolum to evaluate the effect of soil salinity on growth traits and compare the yield of 12 cotton genotypes. Soil salinity was 12.5 dS/m at planting time. The results showed that soil salinity established a significant effect on growth and yield traits including germination percent, plant height, boll weight, yield of first peaking, yield of second peaking, total yield and yield earliness. The greatest germination percent was obtained by Shirpan 539, Çukurova and Q28 genotypes. In mean comparison of the data, Sahel genotype had the highest height and the heaviest boll. Golestan genotype produced the most total yield because of production the considerable more yield in second picking, However 539 Shirpan genotype produced the most yield in first peaking. The earliness of latter genotype had too much preference as compared to other genotypes. Finally, according to the results, extension and expansion of Golestan genotype cultivation was recommended for salt-affected soils in Golestan province. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cotton genotypes, Golestan Province, Soil salinity, yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmad, S., Khan, N.I., Iqbal, M.Z., Hussain, A., and Hassan, M. 2002. Salt
tolerance of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Asi. J. Plant Sci. 6:715-719.
Ali, Y., Aslam, Z., and Asif, M. 2004. A high yielding and salt tolerant new
cotton variety NIAB-999. Int. J. Biol. Biotech. 1(2): 181-85.
Ashraf, M. 2002. Salt tolerance of cotton: Some new advances. Crit. Rev. Plant
Sci. 21(1):1-30.
Ashraf, M., and Ahmad, S. 2000. Ifluence of sodium chloride on ion
accumulation, yield components and fibre characteristics in salt tolerant and
salt sensitive lines of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crops Res.
66(2): 115-127.
Azhar, F.M., and McNeilly, T. 2001. Compartmentation of Na+ and Cl- ions in
different parts of Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench during plant development.
Pakistan J. Bot. 33(1): 101-107.
Barzegar, A. 2000. Saline and sodic soils (knowledge and efficiency).
University of Chamran martyr. Iran.
Basal, H., Demiral, M.A., and Canavar, O. 2006. Shoot biomass production of
converted race stocks of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) exposed to
salt stress. Asian J. Plant Sci. 5(2): 238-42.
Choudhary, O., Josan, A., and Bajwa, M. 2001. Yield and fiber quality of
cotton cultivars as affected by the build-up of sodium in the soils with
sustained sodic irrigations under semi-arid conditions. Agric. Water
Manage. 49: 1-9.
Dalton, R.G., Eddiep, P.M., and Carnlucas, M. 1994. Antioxidant response to
NaCl stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars of cotton. Crop Sci.
34: 706 – 714.
Dong, H. 2012. Technology and field management for controlling soil salinity
effects on cotton. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 6:333–341.
FAO. 2008. FAO land and plant nutrition management service. Available
online at: http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/spush/. Accessed 25 April 2008.
Flowers, T.J., and Yeo, A.R. 1995. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop
plants: where next?. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22(6): 875-884.
Ghorbani-nasrabad, G. 2004. The effect of water deficit on quantity and quality
of cotton cultivars and determination of yield function. Cotton research
Institute of Iran.
Gill, K.S., and Kumar, S. 1999. Effects of salinity on germination, seedling
growth and salt tolerance indices in cotton (Gossypium spp.). Appl. Biol.
Res., 1(2): 117-120.
Gossett, D.R., Millhollon, E.P., and Lucas, M.C. 1994. Antioxidant response to
NaCl stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars of cotton. Crop Sci.
34: 706-714.
Higbie, S.M., Wang, F., Stewart, J.M., Sterling, T.M., Lindemann, W.C.,
Hughs, E., and Zhang, J. 2010. Physiological response to salt (NaCl) stress
in selected cultivated tetraploid cottons. Int. J. Agron. 1:1–12.
Hillel, D. 2000. Salinity management for sustainable irrigation. Integrating
Science, Environment, and Economics. The International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank. Washington, DC. USA.
Hosseini, G., and Thengane, R.J. 2007. Salinity tolerance in Cotton (Gossypium
hirsutum L) genotypes. Int. J. Bot. 3(1): 48-55.
Huang, J., and Redmann, R.E. 1995. Salt tolerance of hordeum and brassica
species during germination and early seedling growth. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 75:
815 – 819.
Jamil, M., Lee, C.C., Rehman, S.U., Lee, D.B., Ashraf, M., and Rha, E.S. 2005.
Salinity (NaCl) tolerance of brassica species at germination and early
seedling growth. Electronic J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 4: 970-976.
Kasraee, R. 1989. The effects of increasing salt concentration as sodium
potassium and chloride with various ratio on development of two salt
tolerant varieties of barely. J. Agri. Sci. 3(1&2): 20-39.
Khan, A.N., Qureshi, R.H., Ahmad, N., and Rashid, A. 1995. Response of
cotton cultivars to salinity in various growth development stages. Sarhad J.
Agric. 11: 729-731.
Kingsbury, R.W., and Epstein, E. 1984. Selection for salt resistant spring
wheat. Crop Sci. 24: 310-315.
Lin, H., Salus, S.S., and Schumaker, K.S. 1997. Salt sensivity and the cultivars
of the H+ - Atpases in cotton seedling. Crop Sci. 37: 190 – 197.
Maas, E.V. 1986. Salt tolerance of plants. Appl. Agric. Res., 1: 12-26.
Malival, G., and Palival, P. 1984. Salt tolerance of some paddy, maize,
sirghoum, cotton & tobacco varieties at germination and early growth stage.
Agri. Sci. Digest India. 4: 147-149.
Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 2nd edition. Academic
press London, UK.
Niu, G., Rodriguez, D., Dever, J., and Zhang, J. 2013. Growth and
physiological responses of five cotton genotypes to sodium chloride and
sodium sulfate saline water irrigation. J. Cotton Sci. 17:233–244.
Qadir, M., and Shams, M. 1997. Some agronomic and physiological aspects of
salt tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci.
179:101–106.
Ramazani-moghaddam, M.R. 2000. Evaluation of salt tolerance of cotton
cultivars. Research report. Agricultural Reserch station, Kashmar, khorasan
Razavi agricultural and natiral resources research and education center
publishing, Mashhad, Iran.
Saqib, M., Akhtar, J., Pervaiz, S., Qureshi, R.H., and Aslam, M. 2002.
Comparative growth performance of five cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
genotypes against different levels of salinity. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 39(2): 69-75.
Serrano, R., Mulet, J.M., Rios, G., Marquez, J.A., de Larrinoa, I.F., Leube,
M.P., Mendizabal, I., Pascual-Ahuir, A., Proft, M., Ros, R., and Montesinos,
C. 1999. A glimpse of the mechanisms of ion homeostasis during salt stress.
J. Exp. Bot. 50: 1023-1036.
Smith, C.W., and Cothren, J.T. 1999. Cotton: Origin, History, Technology, and
Production. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. NY. USA.
Stewart, J.M.D., Oosterhuis, D.M., Heitholt, J.J., and Mauney, J.R. 2010.
Physiology of cotton. Springer publications. N.Y. USA.
Tiwari, R.S., and Stewart, J.M.D. 2009. Effect of Salt on Several Genotypes of
Gossypium. P. 34-36. In D.M. Oosterhuis (ed.). Summaries of Arkansas
cotton research 2008. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Division of
Agriculture. University of Arkansas. USA.
Tort, N. 1996. Effects of light different growth media temperature and salt
constraction on germination of cotton seed. Agron. Crop Sci. 176(4): 717 –
727.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,507 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,493 |
||