Related Links
Reducing the drought stress effects on yield and yield components of cotton by A200 super absorbent | ||
| پژوهش های پنبه ایران | ||
| Article 8, Volume 2, Issue 2, December 2015, Pages 107-117 PDF (920.07 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/ijcr.2015.102036 | ||
| Authors | ||
| S. M.R. Ahmadi1; B. Sohrabi* 2; H. Amirpanah3 | ||
| 1M.Sc. Student, Rasht Islamic Azad University | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Cotton Research Institute of Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Prof., Rasht Islamic Azad University | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This study was carried out to evaluate of various levels of water and super absorbent polymer (SAP) application on Cotton yield and yield component of Golestan Variety at Hashemabad Cotton Research Station, Gorgan/ Iran. In this experiment Three levels of Irrigation water Including: Rainfed (I0), 50% (I50) and 100% (I100) cotton Water Requirements and five levels of super absorbent polymer application 0 (S0), 10 (S10), 20 (S20), 30 (S30), 40 (S40) gr/m3soil at three replications were compared. Analysis of variance showed that the amount of irrigation water had a significant impact on the sympodia branch number, number of bolls, number of nodes on the main stem, and fiber micronaire. But the irrigation regime had no significant effect on monopodia branches, 30 bolls weight, cottonseed yield. Finaly, analysis of variance showed that SAP and interaction between Irrigation regime & SAP had no significant effect on number of sympodia & monopodia branch, number of nodes, 30 bolls weight, number of boll, cotton seed yield, lint percentage. Therefore, the use of super absorbent for cotton fields are recommended only in terms of water scarcity and Hydrologic drought condition. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Deficit Irrigation; Hydrogel; Golestan variety; Moisture protection | ||
| References | ||
|
Abedi-Koupai, J. and Asadkazemi, J. 2006. Effects of a hydrophilic polymer on the
field performance of an ornamental plant (cupressus arizonica) under reduced
irrigation regimes. Iranian Polymer Journal, 15(9): 715-725.
Akhter, J., mahmood, K., Malik, K., Mardan, A. Ahmad, Igbal, M.M. 2004.
Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils
and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea. Plant, Soil and
Environment, 50(10): 463-469
Asgari. F., Nafisi. S., Omidian, H., and Hashemi, V. 1994. Synthetic reorganization
and modification the properties of superabsorbent polymers. Proceeding of
International Seminar of Polymer Science and Technology. Shiraz-Iran. 2-3
May, pp: 80-83.
Chatzopoulos, F., J. L.Fugit, I. Quillon, Rodriguez, F., and J.L. Taverdet. 2000.
Etude, eu function de differents parameters, de absorbtion et de la desorbtion
deau par un copolymer acryamide– acrylate de sodium reticule. European
Polymer Journal 36: 51-60.
Ganji Khorramdel, N. 1991. Impact of PR3005A superabsorbent polymer on soil
physical properties. Master thesis, Tarbiat Modares University.
Helalia, A., and Letey, J. 1988. Cationic polymer effects on infiltration rates with a
rainfall simulator. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52: 247-250.
Hutterman, A., Zommorodi, M., Reise, K. 1999. Addition of hydrogels to soil
prolonging the survival of Pinus halepensis seedling subjected to drought. Soil
and Tillage Research, 50: 295-304.
Roshan, B. 2002. Effect of Superabsorbent on quality and quantity of agricultural
products. The Second technical training in agriculture and industry use of
superabsorbent, Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute, p: 142-153
Seyed Dorraji, S., Golchin, A., and Ahmadi, Sh. 2010. The effect of different levels
of superabsorbent polymer and soil salinity on water holding capacity with three
textures of sandy loam and clay. Journal of water and soil, Vol.24, No. 2,may-
Jun 2010, p.306-316.
Silberbush, M., Adar, E., and Malach, Y. 1993. Use of a hydrophilic polymer to
improve Water storage and availability to crops grown in sand dunes.
Agricultural Water entertainment, 23:303-313.
Taban, M. and Movahedi Naeini, S.A.R. 2006. Effect of Aquasorb and organic
compost amendments on soil water retention and evaporation whit different
evaporation potentials and soil textures. Communications in Soil Science and
Plant Analysis, 37: 2031-2055.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,516 PDF Download: 1,637 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb