Related Links
Preliminary results of estimating above- ground biomass using Randomized Branch Sampling method for planted Mulberry and Black Locust in Mobarakeh Steel region | ||
| تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر ایران | ||
| Article 10, Volume 19, Issue 4 - Serial Number 46, December 2012, Pages 571-562 PDF (270.64 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research article | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/ijfpr.2011.107518 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Seiavosh Bakhtiarvand Bakhtiari1; Hormoz Sohrabi* 2 | ||
| 1M.Sc. Student of Forest Science, Faculty of Natural Resource and Earth Science, University of Shahrekord | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Faculty of Natural Resource and Marine Science, Tarbiat Modares University | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Estimation of biomass has many applications in forestry practices and researches. Randomized Branch Sampling (RBS) is one of the methods, which is used for estimating tree biomass. In this research, RBS method was introduced and the accuracy of biomass estimation was tested for total and crown biomass of 5 trees in the plantations of two species including Mulberry (Morus alba) and Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). The plantations are located in Mobarake Steel Complex area in the semi-arid regions of Esfahan province in Iran. Actual biomass was measured by weighting all tree components and estimated biomass was calculated by RBS method. Actual and estimated biomass was compared by paired t –test. Results showed that there is no significant difference between crown and total amount of actual and estimated biomass for both species. Relative bias varied between 3.3 to 7.6 percent. Although results of this research by cutting 5 trees seem to be Preliminary, this research showed that RBS method can be considered as an accurate method for estimating tree biomass. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Randomized Branch Sampling; above- ground biomass; Mulberry; Black locust; Mobarake Steel Complex | ||
| References | ||
|
- بینام، 1371. طرح جامع و تفصیلی لنداسکیپ مجتمع فولاد مبارکه. شرکت فولاد مبارکه اصفهان، 227 صفحه. - Gregoire, T., Valentine, H. and Furnival, G., 1995. Sampling methods to estimate foliage and other characteristics of individual trees. Ecology, 76: 1181-1194. - Good, N., Paterson, M., Brack, C. and Mengersen, K., 2001. Estimating tree component biomass using variable probability sampling methods. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 6: 258-267. - Jessen, R.J., 1955. Determining the fruit count on a tree by randomized branch sampling. Biometrics, 11: 99-109. - Jorge, C. and Saborowski, J., 2005. Comparison of randomized branch sampling with and without replacement at the first stage. Silva Fennica, 39 (2): 201-216. - Peper, P. and Mcpherson, G., 1998. Comparison of four foliar and woody biomass estimation methods applied to open-grown deciduous trees. Journal of arboriculture, 24: 191-200. - Snowdon, P., Raison, J. and Eamus, D., 2002. Protocol for sampling tree and stand biomass. Australian Greenhouse Office Publication, 67 p. - Valentine, H., 2002. Randomized branch sampling. Encyclopedia of environmetrics, Vol. 3, John Wiley and sons publication, 1896 p. - Valentine, H. and Hilton, S., 1977. Sampling Oak foliage by the randomized-branch method. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 7: 295-298. - Valentine, H., Tritton, M. and Furnival, G., 1984. Subsampling trees for biomass, volume or mineral content. Forest Science, 30: 673-681. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 666 PDF Download: 511 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb