| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,081 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,377 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 47,993,066 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 78,919,925 |
The Impacts Economic Analysis of Deficit Irrigation and Integrated Application of Biological Fertilizers on Cultivation of Borage in Iran | ||
| Journal of Medicinal plants and By-products | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 5، شماره 1، تیر 2016، صفحه 59-65 اصل مقاله (119.43 K) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jmpb.2016.108925 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Enayatollah Tafazolli* 1؛ Yaghoob Zeraatkish2؛ Seyed Nematollah Moosavi1 | ||
| 1Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch, Marvdasht, Iran | ||
| 2Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Experiment was conducted as split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications in Kermanshah to shed lights on economic analysis of deficit irrigation and integrated application of biological and chemical fertilizer son cultivation of medicinal plant Borage (Borago officinalis L). Irrigation tritments include: a) 30% less water than crop requires invegetative, b) inreproductive,c) in vegetative+reproductive and d) control (100% crop water requirement). Fertilizer treatments include applying 100% chemical fertilizer, 50% chemical fertilizers+biological fertilizers and 25% chemical+biological fertilizers. The results showed that grain yield was decreased under low irrigation. Low irrigation during vegetative and reproductive stages was found to 9.5 and 15.7%. Low economic efficiency of low irrigation water in vegetative stage was much more than reproductive and vegetative growth less up to 32.2% and 27.1% respectively. Integrated use of organic and chemical fertilizers by 50% and 25% alleviated cost of fertilizer to 38% and 63% respectively. Among deficit irrigation treatments, vegetative low irrigation treatment had net and gross income to low reproductive irrigation and low vegetative reproductive irrigation. The 50% chemical+bio fertilizers in comparison with 100% chemical fertilizers had higher net and gross income than vegetative, reproductive and vegetative+reproductive stages. The mentioned treatments compared with 100% chemical fertilizers improved benefit-cost ratio to control treatment and vegetative deficit irrigation 27% and 15.7% respectively. Based on results, vegetative deficit irrigation showed the better economic indexes in comparison with other treatments. However, in case deficit irrigation is necessary, the vegetative deficit irrigation and using 50% chemical biofertilizer are recommended. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Borage؛ economic analysis؛ Net income؛ Gross income | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. MajdSalimi B, Salavatian F. Effect of sprinkler irrigation frequencies on tea plant productivity qualitative characteristics of the economic evaluation. J. water & soil,2010;24:845-854.
2. Asadi H, Neishaboori MR, Siadat H. Evaluating the Wheat Response Factor to Water (Ky) in Different Growth Stages in Karaj. Iranian, J. Agric. Sci. 2003;34:579-586.
3. Hamzeii Y, Rahim F, Khoeizedeh G, Moghadam K. Response of potato cultivars with different amounts of water. J. Agric Know, 2005;15:65-75.
4. Fardad H, Golkar HR. Economic analysis branch deficit irrigation of wheat. J. Agric Sci, 2002;33:305-312.
5. Noorju A, BahghaeeKia J. Effects of deficit irrigation on the quantity and quality of sugar beet in the mentioned area. Sugar b mag, 2006;22:53-66.
6. Fereres E, Soriano MA. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J. Exper Bot, 2007;58:147-159.
7. SalimiKoorosh M,Amiri E.Economic productivity analysis of water and nitrogen fertilizer for tea production with sprinclerirrigation system,J. soil and water res conv, 2014;3:37-45
8. English M, Nuss GS. Designing for deficit irrigation. Irrig and drain, 1982;108:91-106.
9. Sepaskhah AR, Boersma L. Shoot and root growth exposed to several levels of matric potential and NACL induced osmotic potential of soil water. Agron. J. 1979;71:746-752.
10. English M. Deficit Irrigation: Analytical framework. J. Irrig drain eng, 1990;116:399-412.
11. Katerji N, Van Hoorn JW, Hamdy A, Mastrorilli M, Karama F. Salinity and drought, a comparison of their effects on the relationship betweenyield and evapotranspiration. Agric Water Man, 1998;36:45-54.
12. Pankovic D, Sakac Z, Kcvrosan S, Plesnicar M. Acclimation tolong term Water deficit in the leaves of two sunflower hybrids: photosynthesis,electron transport and carbon metabolism. J. Exp. Bot,1999;50:127-138.
13. Tavakoli A, Fardad h. Effects of deficit irrigation on sugar beet and determine its function. MSc Thesis Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, Tehran University. 1996.
14. Arabzadeh A. Tavakoli AR. Economic Analysis of deficit irrigation in rice cultivation doing laundry. J. Agric Eng Res. 2006;7:99-110.
15. Soleimanipoor A, Farhadi A. Bagheri. Economic Analysis of ethylene in Cucumber. Res and cons. 2004;65:58-66.
16-Ghahraman B, Sepaskhah AR. Optimal allocation of water from a single purpose reservoir to an irrigation project with pre-determined multiple cropping patterns. Irrig Sci. 2002;21:127-137. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 572 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 678 |
||