| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,049 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,082 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 46,534,008 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 77,582,388 |
جداسازی قارچ‌های آنتاگونیست از باغ‌های چای و بررسی تأثیر آن‌ها روی نماتود مولد زخم ریشه Pratylenchus loosi در آزمایشگاه | ||
| مهار زیستی در گیاه‌پزشکی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 5، شماره 1، شهریور 1396، صفحه 81-91 اصل مقاله (580.1 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/bcpp.2017.116073 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ابوالفضل یحیوی آزاد* 1؛ علی سراجی2؛ علی اکبر حجت جلالی3؛ صمد جمالی3 | ||
| 1گروه گیاه‌پزشکی پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه | ||
| 2پژوهشکدۀ چای، موسسۀ تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، لاهیجان | ||
| 3گروه گیاه‌پزشکی پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| درحال حاضر در بسیاری از کشورها از جمله ایران، نماتود مولد زخم ریشه Pratylenchus loosi مهم‌ترین عامل خسارت‌زای چای محسوب میشود. به‌منظور مهار زیستی این نماتود با استفاده از قارچ‌های آنتاگونیست، نمونه‌برداری از خاک و ریشه درختچه‌های چای در بهار و تابستان 1392 در مناطق چای‌کاری استان‌های گیلان و مازندران صورت‌گرفت. جدایه‌های مختلفی از قارچ‌ها از نمونه‌های خاک و یا از نماتودهای انگلی شده جداسازی و شناسایی شدند. این جدایه‌ها شاملPaecilomyces lilacinus (T1, N1, N3)، Fusarium culmorum، F. graminearum، Cladosporium sp.، Trichoderma harzianum (T1, T2, T3) بودند. آزمایش‌های مربوط به‌آنتاگونیستی این قارچ‌ها علیه نماتود P. loosi در محیط آب آگار 5/1 درصد انجام شد و درصد مرگ و میر سنین لاروی و نماتود بالغ P. loosi در سه فاصله زمانی 48، 72 و 168 ساعت (یک هفته) بررسی و ثبت شد. از میان 11 جدایه مورد آزمایش، پس از یک هفته جدایۀ ((T1 قارچ P. lilacinus، با ایجاد 64 و 29 درصد و جدایۀ (N1) P. lilacinus با 47 و 24 درصد مرگ و میر به‌ترتیب در سنین لاروی و نماتود بالغ P. loosi با تفاوت معنی‌داری بالاترین میزان مرگ و میر را نسبت به‌سایر تیمارها به‌خود اختصاص دادند. ضمناً در این بررسی هیچ کدام از جدایه‌های قارچ Trichoderma harzianum در مقایسه با شاهد تأثیری در مهار زیستی نماتود مورد بحث نداشتند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| چای؛ مهار زیستی؛ نماتود مولد زخم ریشه؛ Pratylenchus loosi؛ Paecilomyces lilacinus | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Isolation of antagonistic fungi from tea plantation and study of their impact on tea root lesion nematode Pratylenchus loosi in laboratory | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Aboulfazl Yahyavi Azad1؛ Ali Seraji2؛ Ali Akbar Hojjat Jalali3؛ Samad Jalilian3 | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Tea root lesion nematode, (Pratylenchus loosi) is currently considered as the most important damage-causing agent in the most tea-producing countries including Iran. In order to use antagonistic fungi for biological control of this nematode, samples of soil and tea roots were collected during the spring and summer of 2013 in tea plantation of Guilan and Mazandaran provinces. Different fungi were isolated and identified from collected soil samples and or parasitic nematodes. These isolates included Paecilomyces lilacinus (isolates T1, N1, N3), Fusarium culmorum, F. graminearum, Cladosporium sp. and Trichoderma harzianum (isolates T1, T2, T3). Pathogenicity tests of these fungi on nematode were conducted on 1.5% water agar and mortality rate of Juvenile and adult nematodes were determined at three different periods of 48, 72 and 168 hours. Among the 11 tested isolates, the isolate of P. lilacinus (T1) with causing 64% mortality of juveniles and 29% the adults and also the isolate of P. lilacinus (N1)with having 47% mortality rate in juveniles and 24% in adults after 168 hours, had the highest mortality rate compared with other fungi. Also in this study, T. harzianum fungus was a very weak biocontrol agent compared with other isolates. The overall results showed that P. lilacinus have high potential to control tea root lesion nematode. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| biological control, Paecilomyces lilacinus, Pratylenchus loosi, root lesion nematode, Tea | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bagheri, M. & Seraji, A. 2012. Control of tea root lesion nematode Pratylenchus loosi by manure, dolomite and ragbi in greenhouse. Proceeding of the 20th Congress of Iranian Plant Protection, 26-29 August, Shiraz, Iran. (In Persian). Carling, L.E. & Sumner, D.R. 1992. Rhizoctonia, pp., 157-165. In: Singleton, L.L., Mihail, J.D. & Rush, C.M. (eds.), Methods for Research on Soil-borne Phytopathogentic Fungi. APS Press, USA. Castillo, P. & Vovlas, N. 2007. Pratylenchus(Nematoda:Pratylenchidae): diagnosis, biology, pathogenicity and management. Nematology Monographs and Perspectives, 6: 1-530. Castro, J.M.C., Lima, R.D., Ferraz, S. & Neves, J.C.L. 2000. Capacidade de predacao de Arthrobotrys musiformis a fitonematoides. Summa Phytopathologica, 26: 58-62. Cayrol, J.C., Djian, C. & Pijarowski, L. 1989. Study of nematicidal properties of the culture filtrate of the nematophagous fungus Paecilomyces lilacinus. Journal of Nematology, 12: 331-336. Chavooshisani, M., Jamali, S., Taheri, H. & Khodaparast, A. 2013. Biological control of citrus nematode (Tylenchulus semipenetrans) using antagonistic fungi. Plant Protection (Scientific Journal of Agriculture), 36(1): 75-88. (In Persian). Coolen, W.A. & d,Herd, C.J. 1972. A Method for the Quantitative Extraction of Nematodes from Plant Tissue. Ghent Agri. Res. Cent., Belgium. Djian, C., Pijarowski, L., Ponchet, M., Arpin, N. & Favrebonvin, J. 1991. Acetic-acid a selective nematocidal metabolite from culture filtrates of Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson and Trichoderma longibrachiatum Rifai. Nematologica, 37: 101-112.
Elsen, A., Gervacio, D., Swennen, R. & Waele, D. 2008. AMF-induced biocontrol against plant parasitic nematodes in Musa sp.: a systemic effect. Mycorrhiza, 18: 251-256. Ganaie, M.A. & Khan, T.A. 2010. Biological Potential of Paecilomyces lilacinus on pathogenesis of Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato plant. European Journal of Applied sciences, 2: 80-84. Gapasin, R.M. 1995. Evaluacion de Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson para el controd de Pratylenchus sp. en maiz. Biocontrol, 1: 35-39. Ghasemi, F., Kargarbideh, A., Banihashemi, Z. & Zarghani, H. 2007. Effect of Clonostachys spp. on Meloidogyne incognita activity in greenhouse. Proceeding of the 20th Congress of Iranian Plant Protection, 26-29 August, Shiraz, Iran. (In Persian). Hojjat Jalali, A.A. & Ghasempour, H. 2006. Biological control of plant parasitic nematodes, progress, problems and perspectives (Compilation: Graham, R. Stirling). Razi University of Kermanshah Publication, First Edition. (In Persian). Jansson, H.B., Dackman, C. & Zuckerman, B.M. 1987. Adhesion and infection of plant parasitic nematodes by the fungus Drechmeria coniospora. Nematologica, 33: 480-487. Khan, A., Willians, K.L. & Nevalainen, H.K.M. 2006. Infection of plant-parasitic nematode by Paecilomyces lilacinus and Monacrosporium lysipagum. Biocontrol, 51: 659-678. Leslie, F.J. & Summerell, A.B. 2006. The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Blackwell Publishing Asia, Carlton, Victoria, Australia. Loof, P.A.A. 1960. Taxonomic studies on the genus Pratylenchus (Nematoda). T. Pl. Ziekten, 66: 29-90. Lopez-Llorca, L.V., Macia-Vicente, J.G. & Jansson, H.B. 2008. Mode of action and interactions of nematophagus fungi. pp. 51-76 In: Ciancio, A. & Mukerji, K.G. (eds.), Integrated Management and Biocontrol of Vegetable and Grain Crops Nematodes. Springer, The Netherlands. Mirghasemi, S.N., Seraji, A., Jamali, S. & Hosseinikhah Choshali, A. 2014. Reported some new species of plant parasitic nematodes from rhizosphere of tea plantation in Iran. International Journal of Biosciences, 9(5): 37-46. Moosavi, M.R. & Zare, R. 2012. Fungi as biological control agents of plant-parasitic nemetodes, pp. 67-107. In: Merrillon, J.M. & Ramawat, K.G. (eds.), Plant Defence: Biological Control. Springer. Nassaj Hosseini, M. 2003. Study of intraction between four species of root and tea root lesion nematode. M.Sc. Thesis, Tarbiat Modarres university, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian). Nicolay, R. & Sikora, R.A. 1989. Techniques to determine the activity on fungal egg parasites of Heterodera schachtii in field soil. Revue de, Nematologie, 12: 97-102. Pinochet, J., Calvet, C., Camprubi, A. & Fernandez, C. 1995. Interaction between the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus vulnus and the mycorrhizal association of Glomus intraradices and Santa Lucia 64 cherry rootstock. Plant and Soil, 170: 323-329. Qureshi, A.S., Bhutto, M.A., Khushk, I. & Dahot, M.U. 2011. Optimization of cultural conditions for protease production by Bacillus subtilis EFRL 01. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(26): 5173-5181. Rahanandeh, H., Khodakaramian, G., Hassanzadeh, N., Seraji, A. & Asghari, S.M. 2012. Characteristics and antagonistic potential of Pseudomonas spp. against Pratylenchus loosi. Plant Pathology & Microbiology, 3: 6. Rao, G.V. 1973. Effects of nematode-trapping fungi on the biology of the lesion nematode, Pratylenchus penetrans (Cobb) Filipjev & Shuurmans Stekhoven. Dissertation Abstracts International 34B, 486-487. Sabet, F., Lia, M. & Sharifnabi, B. 2013. Biological control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica by four isolates of Paecilomyces lilacinus and an isolate of Isaria farinosa on tomato plants. Journal of Plant Pathology, 49: 65-67. Samson, R.A. 1974. Paecilomyces and some allied Hyphomycetes. Studies in Mycology, 6: 1-119. Seraji. A. 2007. Biology and population dynamics of tea root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus loosi) in Iran and the possibility of its loss assessment on the host usin epidemiological models. Ph.D Thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran. (In Persian). Seraji, A., Pourjam, E., Tanha Moafi, Z. & Safaei, N. 2007. Biology and population dynamics of tea root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus loosi) in Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant pathology, 43: 98-115. Sharon, E., Chet, I. & Spiegel, Y. 2011. Trichoderma as a biological control agent. pp. 183-201. In: Davies, K. & Spiegel, Y. (eds.), Biological Control of Plant Parasitic Nematodes: Building Coherence between Microbial Ecology and Molecular Mechanisms. Springer Science, Business Media B.V. Sikora, R.A. & Hoffman, H.S. 1992. Importance of plant health – promoting rhizobacteria for the control of soil-borne fungal disease and plant parasitic nematodes. Arabian Journal plant protection, 10: 48-53. Talavera, M., Ltou, K. & Mizukubo, T. 2001. Reduction of nematode damage by root colonization with arbuscular mycorrhiza (Glomus spp.) in tomato- Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida:Meloidogynidae) and carrot- Pratylenchus penetrans (Tylenchida: Pratylenchide) pathosystems. Applied Entomolgy and Zoology, 36: 387-392. Tanha Moafi, Z. 1992. Report of root lesion nematode Pratylenchus loosi from the tea seeding imported from Japan. Journal of Plant Pests and Disease, 60: 93-94. (In Persian). Timper, P. & Brodie, B.B. 1993. Infection of Pratylenchus penetrans by nematode-pathogenic fungi. Journal of Nematology, 25: 297-302. Timper, P. & Brodie, B.B. 1994. Effect of Hirsutella rhossiliensis on infection of potato by Pratylenchus penetrans. Journal of Nematology, 26(3): 304-307. Tiyagi, S.A. & Shamim, A. 2004. Biological control of plant parasitic nematodes associated with chickpea using oil cakes and Paecilomyces lilacinus. Indian Journal of Nematology, 34: 44-48. Vos, C.M., Tesfahun, A.N., Panis, B., De Waele, D. & Elsen, A. 2012. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induce systemic resistance in tomato against the sedentary nematode Meloidogyne incognita and the migratory nematode Pratylenchus penetrans. Applied Soil Ecology, 61: 1-6. Whitehead, A.G. & Hemming, G.R. 1965. A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. Annals of Applied Biology, 53: 485-942. Willson, K.C. 1999. Coffee, Cocoa and Tea. CABI publishing. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 655 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 603 |
||