| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,020 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,742 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 44,988,422 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 47,398,682 |
ارزیابی برخی از خصوصیات میوه و عملکرد ژنوتیپ‌های امیدبخش زیتون در استان کرمانشاه | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 34، شماره 2، شهریور 1397، صفحه 161-175 اصل مقاله (202.95 K) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/spij.2018.118833 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رحمت اله غلامی* 1؛ عیسی ارجی2؛ فریبا اکبری3 | ||
| 1استادیار، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| 3کارشناس آموزش،مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به‌منظور ارزیابی برخی خصوصیات میوه هفت ژنوتیپ امیدبخش زیتون و یک رقم تجاری زیتون به عنوان شاهد آزمایشی در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در ایستگاه تحقیقاتی زیتون دالاهو شهرستان سرپل‌ذهاب واقع در استان کرمانشاه در سال 1395 و 1396 اجرا گردید. عملکرد میوه در درخت و ویژگی‌های میوه از قبیل وزن میوه، وزن گوشت، وزن هسته، درصد گوشت میوه، درصد ماده خشک عملکرد و محتوای روغن اندازه‌گیری شد. نتایج نشان داد که ژنوتیپ‌ها تفاوت معنی‌داری از نظر خصوصیات میوه و عملکرد میوه و روغن داشتند. اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ × سال بر وزن میوه، گوشت و هسته، درصد گوشت، عملکرد میوه و روغن معنی‌دار بود. ژنوتیپDd1 (رقم دیره) با میانگین 87/7 گرم، دارای بیشترین وزن میوه بودند و ژنوتیپPs1 با میانگین 31/3 گرم، کمترین مقدار وزن میوه را داشت. اثر ژنوتیپ، سال و اثر متقابل آنها بر عملکرد و میوه و روغن در سطح احتمال 1% معنی‌دار بود. بیشترین عملکرد میوه و روغن مربوط به ژنوتیپ Bn6 به‌ترتیب با 17653کیلوگرم در هکتار و 10/2362 کیلوگرم در هکتار بود. رقم سویلانو کمترین مقدار عملکرد میوه با میانگین 3000 کیلوگرم در هکتار و روغن با میانگین دو ساله 90/218 کیلوگرم در هکتار را داشت. با توجه به عملکرد میوه و روغن، ژنوتیپ‌های Bn6 و Dd1 به‌عنوان ژنوتیپ‌های برتر در مقایسه با سایر ژنوتیپ‌ها و رقم شاهد شناخته شدند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| زیتون؛ وزن میوه؛ درصد ماده خشک؛ عملکرد میوه؛ عملکرد روغن | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of Some Fruit Characteristics and Yield Promising Olive Genotypes in Kermanshah Province in Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Rahmatollah Gholami1؛ I. Arji2؛ F. Akbari3 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Field and Horticultural Crops Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Field and Horticultural Crops Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 3Instructor,Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| To evaluate some fruit characteristics and yield of seven promising olive genotypes a field experiment was carried out- using randomized complete block design with three replications in 2016 in Dallaho research station, Sarepol Zahab, Iran. Fruit yield and some fruit characteristics including; fruit weight, stone weight, drymatter (%), oil content were measured. Results showed that genotypes were significantly different for fruit yield and fruit characteristics. Genotype × year interaction effect was significant on fruit weight, fruit flesh weight, stone weight, flesh percentage, fruit yield and oil yield. Dd1 genotype with mean of 7.87 g had the heighest and Ps1 genotype with 3.31 g had the least fruit weight. Genotype, year and genotype × year interaction effects were significant on fruit yield and oil yield. The highest fruit and oil yield belonged to Bn6 with 17653 kgha-1 and 2362.1, respectively. Cultivar Sevillano had the lowest fruit yield (3000 kgha-1) and oil yield (218.9 kgha-1). Considering fruit and oil yield, Bn6 and Dd1 were identified as superior genotypes. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Olive, fruit weight, dry matter, fruit yield, oil yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aguilera, M. P., Beltran, G., Ortega, D., Fernandez, A., Jimenez, A., and Uceda, M. 2005. Characterisation of virgin olive oil of Italian olive cultivars: Frantoio and Leccino, grown in Andalousia. Food Chemistry 89: 387-391.
Ahmadipour, S., and Arji, I. 2012. Evaluation on Zard and Roghani olive cultivars responses in different regions of Kermanshah. The Plant Production 35(1): 113-125 (in Persian).
Ajamgard, F., and Zeinanloo, A. A. 2013. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative yield of olive cultivars in north of Khuzestan province. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 29-1(3): 567-579 (in Persian).
AL-Maaitah, M. I., AL-Absi, K.M., and AL-Rawashdeh, A. 2009. Oil quality and quantity of three olive cultivars as influenced by harvesting date in the middle and southern parts of Jordan. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 1: 266-272.
Anonymous, 2002. Methodology for the secondary characterization of olive varieties held in collection. Project on conservation, characterization, collection of Genetic Resources in olive. International Olive Oil Council. 23 pp.
Anonymous, 2008. Methodology for the primary characterization of olive varieties. International Olive Oil Council, Project RESGEN-CT (67/97), EU/COI. 22 pp.
Arji, I., Zeinanloo, A. A., Hajiamiri, A. M., and Najafi, M. 2013. An investigation into different olive cultivars responses to Sarpole-Zehab environmental condition.The Plant Production 35(4): 17-28 (in Persian).
Arzani, K., and Arji, I. 2002. The responses of young potted olive plant cv. Zard to water stress and deficit irrigation. Acta Horticulturae 587: 419-422.
Bignami, C., Natali, S., Menna, C., and Peruzzi, G. 1994. Growth and phenology of some olive cultivars in central Italy. Acta Horticulturae 356: 106-109.
Boland Nazar, S. Z., Ghavami, M., Servili, M., Hooshmand, D., and Safafar, H. 2013. Changes of oil content and total polyphenol in three varieties of olives during the course of maturation. Journal of Food Science and Technology 39(10): 1-9.
Darvishian, M. 1998. Olive. Nashre Amozesh Publication, Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran. 295 pp. (in Persian).
Dichio, B., Romano, M., Nuzzo, V., and Xiloyannis, C. 2000. Soil water availability and relationship between canopy and root in young olive trees ( cv. Coratina ). Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Olive Growing, Bari, Italy. Page 20.
Faridoni, H., Khademi, Gh., Kharadmand, Gh., and Nasrollah Nejad, M. R. 2011. Flower phenological and fruit characteristics of some olive cultivars in Golestan province. Pp. 1598-1601. In: Proceedings of the 7th Horticultural Sciences Congress of Iran, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. (in Pesrsian).
Galan, C., Garcia-Mozo, H., Vazquez, L., Ruiz-Valenzuela, L., Diaz de la Guardia, C., and Trigo-Perez, M. 2005. Heat requirement for the onset of the Olea europaea L. pollen season in several places of Andalusia region and the effect of the expected future climate change. International Journal of Biometeorology 49(3):184-188.
Gregoriou, C. 2006. Genetic diversity and evaluation of thirty one clones of the local or ladoelia olive variety in Cyprus. Olivebioteq 1: 117-121.
Gucci, R., Gentile, S., Serravalle, M., Tomei, F., and Rapoport, H. F. 2004. The effect of irrigation on fruit development of olive cultivars Frantoio and Leccino. Acta Horticulturae 664: 291-295.
Jibara, G., Jahwar, A., Bido, Z., Cardone, G., Dragotta, A., and Famiani, F. 2006. Preliminary results on the characterization of fruit and oil quality of the main Syrian olive cultivars. Olivebioteq 1: 183-186.
Khalif, M., Ayadii, M., Kammoun, N. G., Arous, M. N., Rekik, H., Hamdi, M. T., and Fakhfak, B. R. 2002. Identifying Chemlali olive variety in its traditional area. Acta Horticulturae 586: 117-121.
Lavee, S., and Wodner, M. 1991. Factors affecting the nature of oil accumulation in fruit of olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Journal of Horticultural Science 66(5): 538-591.
Lavee, S., and Wodner, M. 2004. The effect of yield, harvest time and fruit size on the oil content in fruits of irrigated olive trees (Olea europaea), cvs. Barnea and Manzanillo. Scientia Horticulturae 99: 267–277.
Mailer, R. J., Ayton J., and Conlan, D. 2007. Influence of harvest timing on olive (Olea europaea) oil accumulation and fruit characteristics under Australian conditions. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 5(3/4): 58-63.
Poureskandari, E., Solaimani, A., Saba J., and Taheri. M. 2013. Evaluation of pomological traits and classification of some olive cultivars in Zanjan province. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 29-1 (4): 623-636 (in Persian).
Rahmani, M., Lamrini, M., and Saari Csallany, A. 1997. Development of simple method for the determination of the optimum harvesting date for olives. Olivae 69:48-51.
Ramazani Malekroodi, M., Zeinanloo, A. A., Ghanadamoz, M. S., and Mohamad Salehi, M. 2013. Study and introducing of adapted olive variety to low level salinity soil and dryland area of Roudbar olive cultivation. Pp. 871-875. In: Proceedings of the 8th Horticultural Sciences Congress of Iran, Bou Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. (in Persian).
Sadeghi, H. 2002. Olive production. Nashre Amozesh Publication, Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran. 414 pp. (in Persian).
Taslimpour, M. R., and Zeinanloo, A. A. 2011. Evaluation and investigation of different olive cultivars adaptability in Fars province. pp. 1613-1614. In: Proceedings of the 7th Horticultural Sciences Congress of Iran, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan,Iran. (in Persian).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 607 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 369 |
||