Related Links
Evaluation of mating strategies in breeding ostriches using computer simulation | ||
| علوم دامی | ||
| Article 23, Volume 32, Issue 123, September 2019, Pages 313-322 PDF (1.77 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/asj.2018.123051.1753 | ||
| Author | ||
| Babak Enayati* | ||
| PhD Student, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Kordestan, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The purpose of this study was to compare the four mating strategies in ostrich flocks using simulation. Simulated traits included egg production (EggsPro), chicken production (ChicksPro), hatchability (Hatchability), live weight at the beginning of mating (LWB), and live weight at the end of mating (LWE). The selection of males was based on the breeding value of the LWB trait and the selection of females based on the breeding value of the ChicksPro trait. The first strategy was an optimal mating, the second strategy crossed individuals based on the highest genetic gain, regardless of the increase in inbreeding, the third strategy was the mating of individuals based on the lowest inbreeding, regardless of genetic progress, and the fourth strategy was the mating of individuals randomly, regardless of inbreeding and genetic gain. The results showed that if the goal in a breeding program is rapid progress without limitation on inbreeding, a mating strategy with the highest genetic gain is the best suited, and if there is no possibility of mapping this crosses, a random mating can be replaced. In closed populations with high inbreeding or populations that need to be genetically protected, and secondly important the breeder also wants to improve performance in the economic traits, a mating strategy with minimum inbreeding can be desirable, and if the goal of breeding is a continuous, sustained and significantly improvement in economic traits, which is required to prevent inbreeding, the optimal mating strategy could be the best option. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| ostrich; mating with maximum genetic gain; mating with minimum inbreeding; optimal mating; random mating | ||
| References | ||
|
فروتنیفر، ص.، مهربانی یگانه، ح. و مرادی شهربابک، م. (1391). مقایسه صحت برآورد ارزشهای اصلاحی ژنومی و رایج با استفاده از تجزیه دو صفتی و تک صفتی. فصلنامه علوم دامی ایران. شماره 43، ص ص. 504-497. میر،ف.، رکوعی،م.، داشاب، غ. ر. و فرجی آروق، ه. (1394). استفاده از شبیه سازی تصادفی برای تعیین برنامۀ به گزینی مناسب در گاو نژاد سیستانی. دو فصلنامه تولیدات دامی. شماره 17. ص ص. 170-161. نصر، ج. (1390). راهنمای کامل پرورش شترمرغ (چاپ سوم). انتشارات نوربخش. ص 403. Akdemir, D. and Sanchez, J.I. (2016). Efficient breeding by genomic mating. Frontiers in Genetics. 7:1-12. Caballero, A. and Santiago, M. A. (1996). Systems of mating to reduce inbreeding in selection populations. Animal Science. 62:431-442. Chen, G.K., Marjoram, P. and Wall, J.D. (2009). Fast and flexible simulation of DNA sequence data. Genome Res. 19: 136–142. Cloete, S. W. P., Bunter, K.L. and Van Schalkwyk, S.J. (2002). Progress towards a scientific breeding strategy for ostriches. In: Proceedings of 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France, p. 561. Fair, D. M. (2012). The genetic and environmental modeling of production and reproduction in ostrich females within and across breeding seasons. Ph.D. Thesis. Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of the Free State, South Africa. Fairfull, R. W., McMillan, I. M. and Muir, W. M. (1998). Poultry breeding: Progress and prospects for genetic improvement of egg and meat production. In: Proceedings of 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Armidale, New England, p. 271. Gierdziewicz, M. (1993) Effect of herd size on estimating cattle breeding value. Animal Science Paper and Reports. 11(1): 5-11. Gorjanc, G., Gaynor, R. C. and Hickey, J. M. (2018). Optimal cross selection for long-term genetic gain in two-part programs with rapid recurrent genomic selection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. online Published: 1-14. Haldane, J. (1919). The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors. Genetics. 8: 299-309. Henryon, M., Sorensen, A. C. and Berg, P. (2009). Mating animals by minimizing the covariance between ancestral contributions generates less inbreeding without compromising genetic gain in breeding schemes with truncation selection. Animal. 3(10): 1339-1346. Hudson, R. R. (2004). ms a program for generating samples under neutral models. Bioinformatics. 18: 337-338. Kinghorn, B.P. and Shepherd, R.K. (1999). Mate selection for the tactical implementation of breeding programs. Assoc. Advmt. Anim. Breed. Genet. 13: 130-133. Meuwissen, T.H.E. (1997). Maximizing the response of selection with a pre-defined rate of inbreeding. J. Anim. Sci., 75: 934-940. Misztal, I., S. Tsuruta., D. Lourenco., I. Aguilar., A. Legarra. and Z. Vitezica. (2015). Manual for BLUPF90 family of program. Accessed Mar. 19, 2016. Pong-Wong, R. and Woolliams, J.A. (2007). Optimisation of contribution of candidate parents to maximise genetic gain and restricting inbreeding using semidefinite programming. Genet. Sel. Evol. 39: 3–25. Sonesson, A. K. and Meuwissen, T. H. E. (2000). Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding. Genetic Selection Evolution. 32: 231-248. Sonesson, A. K. and Meuwissen, T. H. E. (2002). Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations. Genetic Selection Evolution. 34:23-39. Sun, X., Peng, T. and Mumm, R. H. (2011). The role and basics of computer simulation in support of critical decisions in plant breeding. Mol. Breed. 28: 421–436. Toro, M. and Perez-Enciso, M. (1990). Optimization of selection response under restricted inbreeding. Genet. Sel. Evol. 22: 93–107. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 635 PDF Download: 458 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb