| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,952 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,275 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 43,872,864 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,379,596 |
ذخیره‌‌سازی کربن در پارک جنگلی آبیدر سنندج | ||
| تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر ایران | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 27، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 77، آذر 1398، صفحه 364-376 اصل مقاله (362.88 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijfpr.2019.127421.1855 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مرضیه رئیسی* 1؛ حامد قادرزاده2؛ مهین ساعدپناه3؛ ایوب مرادی4 | ||
| 1نویسنده مسئول، استادیار، گروه محیط زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران | ||
| 3دانشآموخته کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی محیط زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران | ||
| 4دانشآموخته دکتری جنگلداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| جنگل‌‌های شهری نقش مهمی در کاهش گاز دیاکسید کربن و درنتیجه کنترل تغییر اقلیم دارند، بنابراین کمی‌‌‌سازی مقدار کربن ذخیره‌‌شده برای ارزیابی نقش این جنگل در کنترل آلودگی‌‌‌های اتمسفری ضروری است. پژوهش پیش‌‌رو به کمی‌‌‌سازی مقدار کربن ذخیره‌‌شده در جنگل شهری آبیدر شهر سنندج پرداخت. برای این منظور، از زیتوده گیاهی، لاش‌برگی و علفی موجود در پارک جنگلی و خاک منطقه مورد مطالعه نمونه‌‌‌برداری شد و مورد آزمایش قرار گرفت. براساس نتایج، ذخیره کربن در پارک جنگلی آبیدر درمجموع 72/147 تن در هکتار بود. از این مقدار، 40/29 و 8/66 تن در هکتار به‌ترتیب مربوط به زیتوده سطحی و زیرزمینی درختان بود، درحالی‌که پوشش علفی و لاش‌برگ 1/055 تن در هکتار و خاک 97/72 تن در هکتار کربن در خود ذخیره کرده بودند. همچنین، مقدار ذخیره کربن در گونه‌‌های درختی مختلف متفاوت بود، به‌‌طوری‌‌که اقاقیا نسبت به زبان‌گنجشک، سرو نقره‌ای و شبه‌‌سرو، کربن بیشتری را در زیتوده سطحی و زیرزمینی خود ذخیره کرده بود. یافته‌‌های این پژوهش میتواند در بخش اجرا برای جنگلداری شهری، مدیریت فضای سبز و برنامهریزی شهری به‌منظور کاهش گازهای گلخانهای مفید واقع شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اقاقیا؛ جنگلداری شهری؛ دیاکسید کربن؛ زیتوده | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Carbon storage in the Abidar urban forest, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Marzieh Reisi1؛ Hamed Ghaderzadeh2؛ Mahin Saedpanah3؛ Aiuob Moradi4 | ||
| 1Corresponding author, Assistant Prof., Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
| 3M.Sc. Graduate of Environmental Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
| 4Ph.D. Graduate of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Urban forests play a key role in CO2 reduction and consequently in controlling climate change. Therefore, quantifying carbon storage is essential to understand the role of urban forests in reducing atmospheric pollution. This study quantified carbon storage in the Abidar urban forest of the Sanandaj in the Kurdistan Province. To achieve the aim, trees, leaf litter, grass biomass, and soil were sampled and analyzed. Results showed the carbon storage of 147.72 t/ha in the Abidar forest; with trees above-ground biomass, trees below-ground biomass, leaf litter and grass, and soil storing 40.29, 8.66, 1.055, and 97.72 t/ha of carbon, respectively. The results also confirmed different carbon storage levels in various species, with Robinia pseudoacacia storing more carbon in above and below biomass than Cupressus arizonica, Chamaecyparis sp., and Fraxinus rotundifolia. The results of the study could be beneficial for urban forestry, green areas management, and urban planning to foster clean air and manage greenhouse gas emissions in urban landscapes. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Biomass, carbon dioxide, Robinia pseudoacacia, urban forestry | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Al-Shammary, A.A.G., Kouzani, A.Z., Kaynak, A., Khoo, S.Y., Norton, M. and Gates, W., 2018. Soil bulk density estimation methods: A review. Pedosphere, 28(4): 581-596. - Cai, H., Di, X., Chang, S.X. and Jin, G., 2016. Stand density and species richness affect carbon storage and net primary productivity in early and late successional temperate forests differently. Ecological Research, 31(4): 525-533. - Cairns, M.A., Brown, S., Helmer, E.H. and Baumgardner, G.A., 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia, 111(1): 1-11. - Chave, J. 2006. Measuring wood density for tropical forest trees: a field manual. Sixth Framework Programme, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, 6p. - Díaz-Pinésa, E., Rubioa, A., Van Miegroet, H., Montes, F. and Benito, M., 2011. Does tree species composition control soil organic carbon pools in Mediterranean mountain forests? Forest Ecology and Management, 262(10): 1895-1904. - Escobedo, F., Varela, S., Zhao, M., Wagner, J.E. and Zipperer, W., 2010. Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities. Environmental Science and Policy, 13(5): 362-372. - Ghasemi Aghbash, F., 2018. Soil carbon sequestration and understory plant diversity under needle and broad-leaved plantations (Case study: Shahed forest park of Malayer city). Ecopersia, 6(1): 1-10 (In Persian). - Iranmanesh, Y., Sagheb Talebi, Kh., Sohrabi, H., Jalali, S.Gh. and Hosseini, S.M., 2014. Biomass and carbon stocks of Brant's oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) in two vegetation forms in Lordegan, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari forests. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 22(4): 749-762 (In Persian). - Khademi, A. and Kord, B., 2012. The estimation of carbon storage in biomass of ash tree (Fraxinus rotundifolia mill.) (case study: Khalkhal forest park). Journal of Sciences and Techniques in Natural Resources, 6(4): 13-23 (In Persian). - Liu, C. and Li, X., 2012. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban forests in Shenyang, China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11(2): 121-128. - Liu, N. and Nan, H., 2018. Carbon stocks of three secondary coniferous forests along an altitudinal gradient on Loess Plateau in inland China. PLoS One, 13(5): e01196927. - Maleki, H., Sorooshian, A., Goudarzi, Gh., Nikfal, A. and Baneshi, M.M., 2016. Temporal profile of PM10 and associated health effects in one of the most polluted cities of the world (Ahvaz, Iran) between 2009 and 2014. Aeolian Research, 22: 135-140. - McHale, M.R., Burke, I.C., Lefsky, M.A., Peper, P.J. and McPherson, E.G., 2009. Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees? Urban Ecosystems, 12(1): 95-113. - McPherson, E.G., 1998. Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Sacramento's urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 24(4): 215-223. - Narimani, H., Iran Nezhad Parizi, M.H., Kiani, B. and Ghorbali, R., 2015. Effects of plantation with conifers on carbon sequestration (Case study: Zob-e-Ahan company, Isfahan). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 23(1): 53-63 (In Persian). - Neto, V., Ahmad Ainuddin, N., Wong, M. and Ting, H., 2012. Contributions of forest biomass and organic matter to above-and belowground carbon contents at Ayer Hitam Forest Reserve, Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 24(2): 217-230. - Nowak, D.J., Greenfield, E.J., Hoehn, R.E. and Lapoint, E., 2013. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environmental Pollution, 178: 229-236. - Nusbaumer, J. and Matsumoto, K., 2008. Climate and carbon cycle changes under the overshoot scenario. Global and Planetary Change, 62(1-2): 164-172. - Pataki, D.E., Alig, R.J., Fung, A.S., Golubiewski, N.E., Kennedy, C.A., McPherson, E.G., … and Romero Lankao, P., 2006. Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 12(11): 2092-2102. - Pearson, T.R.H., Brown, S.L. and Birdsey, R.A., 2007. Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon. General Technical Report NRS-18, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, 42p. - Reinmann, A.B. and Hutyra, L.R., 2017. Edge effects enhance carbon uptake and its vulnerability to climate change in temperate broadleaf forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(1): 107-112. - Shanin, V., Komarov, A. and Mäkipää, R., 2014. Tree species composition affects productivity and carbon dynamics of different site types in boreal forests. European Journal of Forest Research, 133(2): 273-286. - Siraj, K.T. and Teshome, B.B., 2017. Potential difference of tree species on carbon sequestration performance and role of forest based industry to the environment (Case of Arsi forest enterprise Gambo district). Environment Pollution and Climate Change, 1(3): 132. - Subedi, B.P., Pandey, S.S., Pandey, A., Rana, E.B., Bhattarai, S., Banskota, T.R., … and Tamrakar, R., 2010. Forest Carbon Stock Masurement: Guidelines For Measuring Carbon Stocks in Community-Managed Forests. ANSAB, FECOFUN and ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal, 69p. - Varamesh, S., Hosseini, S.M. and Abdi, N., 2011. Estimating potential of urban forests for atmospheric carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Studies, 37(57): 113-120 (In Persian). - Vayreda, J., Gracia, M., Canadell, J.G. and Retana, J., 2012. Spatial patterns and predictors of forest carbon stocks in western Mediterranean. Ecosystems, 15: 1258-1270. - Zeng, X., Zhang, W., Cao, J., Liu, X., Shen, H. and Zhao, X., 2014. Changes in soil organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and bulk density after afforestation of the “Beijing–Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control” program in China. Catena, 118: 186-194. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 564 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 388 |
||