- همه نشریات
- نشریات علمی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویچ کشاورزی
- مجلات ترویجی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- سایر نشریات سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- نشریات علمی انجمن ها
- علوم آب و خاک
- علوم اقتصاد و ترویج کشاورزی
- علوم جنگل, مرتع و آبخیزداری
- علوم دامی و شیلات
- علوم زراعی و باغی
- علوم گیاهپزشکی
- علوم مهندسی و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی
- نشریات با زبان انگلیسی
- نشریات با زبان فارسی
- نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
- نشریات علمی
پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 283 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 81 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,722 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,007 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 26,935,496 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,145,623 |
اثر منطقه تولید، تصفیه وش و کرک‌گیری بر جوانه‌زنی و بنیه گیاهچه پنبه رقم ساحل | ||
| پژوهش های پنبه ایران | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 3، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 5، خرداد 1394، صفحه 49-68 اصل مقاله (423.75 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijcr.2016.106075 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| آیدین حمیدی* 1؛ سید جلال میرقاسمی2؛ مهرناز مهرآور3؛ ویکتوریا عسکری4؛ معصومه حسنی5 | ||
| 1استادیار پژوهش موسسه تحقیقات ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال (کرج) | ||
| 2کارشناس‌ارشد موسسه تحقیقات پنبه کشور (گرگان) | ||
| 3کارشناس‌ارشد مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع‌طبیعی استان گلستان (گرگان) | ||
| 4کارشناس ارشد موسسه تحقیقات ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال (کرج) | ||
| 5کارشناس موسسه تحقیقات ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال (کرج) | ||
| چکیده | ||
| ارزیابی اثر منطقه تولید، تصفیه و کرک‌گیری بر جوانه‌زنی و بنیه بذر پنبه رقم ساحل استان گلستان، در تحقیقی به‌صورت فاکتوریل بر پایه طرح کاملاً تصادفی با 4 تکرار انجام شد. تیمارها تصفیه وش مناطق غرب و شرق استان با جین 8 و 16 اره، غلتکی و با دست و کرک‌گیری با اسید سولفوریک و عدم کرک‌گیری بودند. با آزمون جوانه‌زنی استاندارد تعداد گیاهچههای عادی، متوسط زمان جوانه‌زنی، طول و وزن خشک گیاهچه تعیین و هدایت الکتریکی بذرها اندازهگیری شد. اثر متقابل منطقه تولید بذر × روش‌های تصفیه × کرک‌گیری بر صفات معنیدار بود. بالاترین و کمترین تعداد گیاهچه عادی به ترتیب مربوط به بذرهای تصفیه شده با جین غلتکی و کرک‌گیری نشده و بذرهای تصفیه شده با جین 16 اره و کرک‌گیری شده شرق استان بودند. همچنین بذرهای شرق استان تصفیه شده با جین 16 اره و کرک‌گیری نشده و بذرهای غرب استان، تصفیه شده با جین غلطکی و کرک‌گیری شده به ترتیب دارای بیشترین و کمترین متوسط زمان جوانه‌زنی بودند. بذرهای کرک‌گیری نشده و شده غرب و شرق استان، تصفیه شده با جین غلطکی و جین 8 و 16 اره، به‌ترتیب بیشترین و کمترین طول گیاهچه را داشتند. بیشترین و کمترین وزن خشک گیاهچه به‌ترتیب به بذرهای شرق استان تصفیه شده با دست و جین غلطکی و کرک‌گیری شده و نشده بذرهای تصفیه شده با جین 8 و 16 اره و کرک‌گیری نشده این منطقه تعلق داشت. بذرهای غرب استان تصفیه شده با جین 8 اره و کرک‌گیری نشده و بذرهای تصفیه شده با دست و کرک‌گیری شده این منطقه به ترتیب دارای بیشترین و کمترین هدایت‌الکتریکی بودند. براساس نتایج، تصفیه رقم ساحل؛ خصوصاً تولید غرب استان، با جین غلتکی توصیه میگردد تا خسارت مکانیکی پوسته بذر و اثر نامطلوب کرک‌گیری با اسید بر جوانه‌زنی و بنیه بذر کاهش یابد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| پنبه؛ جوانه‌زنی؛ تصفیه وش؛ کرک‌گیری؛ هدایت‌الکتریکی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of production region, ginning and delinting on Sahel cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivar seed germination and seedling vigor | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Aidin Hamidi1؛ Seyed Jalal Mir Ghasemi2؛ Mehrnaz Mehravar3؛ Victoria Askari4؛ Masoumeh Hassani5 | ||
| 1Research Assistant Professor of Seed and Plant Certification and Registration research Institute (SPCRI), Karaj | ||
| 2Msc. of Cotton Research Institute (CRI)-Gorgan | ||
| 3Msc. of Seed and Plant Certification and Registration research Institute (SPCRI), Gorgan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Centre | ||
| 4MSc. of Seed and Plant Certification and Registration research Institute (SPCRI), Karaj | ||
| 5tExpert of Seed and Plant Certification and Registration research Institute (SPCRI), Karaj | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Study of production region, ginning and delinting effects on cotton seed germination and vigor, in Sahel variety was conducted as factorial based on completely randomized design by 4 replications. Treatments were included ginning of cottonseed in west and east area of Golestan by hand, roller, 8 and 16 saw gin and also delinting by Solphoric acid and no delinting. By standard germination test, numbers of normal seedlings, mean germination time, seedling length and dry weight were determined and electrical conductivity of seeds was measured. The interaction effect of Seed production region× ginning methods×delinting was significant on studied traits. The highest and lowest of normal seedlings numbers were related to Seeds of east region ginned by roller, no delinted seeds and 16 saw gin, delinted seeds, respectively. East seeds of Golestan which ginned by 16 saw and no delinting and west of Golestan, ginned by roller gin and delinting had the highest and lowest mean germination time, respectively. Delinted and no delinted seeds in east and west of Golestan province and ginned by roller, 8 and 16 saw gin had the highest and lowest of seedling length, repectively. Seeds of east province which ginned by hand, roller gin and delinted and no delinted seeds which ginned by 8 and 16 saw gin had the highest and the lowest seedling dry weight. The lowest and the highest of electro conductivity were related to ginned seeds of west region by 8 saw gin, no delinting and ginned by hand and delinting, respectively. Based on results, Sahel cultivar seed ginning, especially produced in west of province by roller gin could be recommended for reduction of seed coat mechanical injury and destructive effects of delinting by acid on germination and seed vigor. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cotton, Germination, Ginning, Delinting, Electrical conductivity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Abdul-Baki, A.A., and Anderson, J.D. 1973. Vigor determination in soybean by multiple criteria. Crop Sci. 13: 630-633.
2. Anonymous. 2014. Long term Golestan province weather almanac. Golestan province meteorology office scientific gazette.
3. Bagnara, 1996. Effects of environment on flowering and seed development. In: Seed science and technology. pp: 69-79, By: Van Gastel, A.J.C., Pagnotta, D.M., and Porceddu, E., Icarda, Aleppo, Syria.
4. Baker, R.V. and Griffin, Jr., A.C. 1984. Ginning, In: Cotton. pp: 397-437, By: Kohl, R.J. and Lewis, C.F. No. 24, American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America Inc., Publishers, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
5. Bardow, J.M., and Bauer, P.J. 2010. Germination and seedling development. pp: 48-56, In: McD. Stewart, J., Oosterhuis, D., Heitholt, J.J. and Mauney, J. (Editors), Physiology of cotton Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London, New York.
6. Bardow, J.M., and Davidonis, G.H. 2010. Effects of environment on fiber quality. In: Physiology of cotton, pp: 229-245, By: Mc D. Stewart, J., Oosterhuis, D., Heitholt, J.J. and Mauney, J. (Editors). Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London, New York.
7. Barradas, G. and López-Bellido, R.J. 2007. Seed weight, seed vigor index and field emergence in six upland cotton cultivars. J. Food Agric. Environ. 5:116-121.
8. Basra, S.M.A., Ashraf, M., Iqbal, N., Khaliq, A. and Ahmad, R. 2004. Physiological and biochemical aspects of pre-sowing heat stress on cottonseed. Seed Sci. Technol. 32: 765-774.
9. Bird, L.S., and Reys, A.A. 1967. Effects of cottonseed quality on seed and seedling characteristics. pp: 199-206, In: Brown, J.M. (ed.), Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Dallas, TX. 10-11 Jan. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN.
10. Burke, J.J., and O'Mahony, P.J. 2001. Protective role in acquired thermotolerance of developmentally regulated heat shock proteins in cotton seed. The J. Cotton Sci. 5: 174-183.
11. Buxton, D.R., Patterson, L.L. and Taylor, B.B. 1978. Cottonseed vigor related to harvest and ginning date. Agron. J. 70(4): 539-542.
12. Cherry, J.P., and Leffler, H.R. 1984. Seed, In: Cotton, pp: 512-570, By: Kohl, R.J. and Lewis, C.F. No. 24, American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America Inc., Publishers, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
13. Colwick, R.F., Garner, T.H., Christenbury, G.D., Welch, G.B., Clark, R.L., Delouche, J.C., Baskin, C.C., Sorenson, J.W., Wilkes, L.H., Person, N.K. and Schroder, H.W. 1972. Factors affecting cottonseed damage in harvesting and handling USDA- ARS Product Research Report 135.
14. Colwick, R.F., Lalor, W.F., and Wilkes, L.H. 1984. Harvesting, In: Cotton, pp: 368-396, By: Kohl, R.J., and Lewis, C.F. No. 24, American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America Inc., Publishers, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
15. Delouch, J.C. 1986. Harvest and post-harvest factors affecting the quality of cotton planting seed and seed quality evaluation. In: Cotton Physiology. pp: 483-518, Mauney, J.R. and McD. Stewart, J. (eds), The cotton foundation, Memphis, TN, USA.
16. Dornbos, D.L., Jr. 2002. Production environment and seed quality. In: Seed quality, basic mechanisms and agricultural implications. By: Basra, A.S.(Ed.), pp:119-152. Food Products Press.
17. Edmisten, K. 2013. Cotton seed quality and planting decision. Technical Report. p. 206. North Carolina State University, U.S.A.
18. Ellis, R.H., and Roberts, E.H. 1981. The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 9: 377-409.
19. Furbeck, S.M., Bourland, F.M. and Watson, C.E. 1993. Inheritance of resistance to seed deterioration in cotton. Euphytica, 69: 203-209.
20. Gooding, M.J., Murdoch, A.J., and Elis, R.H. 2000. The value of seeds. In: Seed technology and biological basis, By: Black, M. and Bewely, J.D.(Eds.), pp: 3-41. CRC Press.
21. Gregg B., and Billups, G.L. 2009. Seed conditioning (Vol.1, Management). CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
22. Gregg, B.R., and Billups, G.L. 2010a. Cottonseed delinting, In: Seed conditioning, Vol. 2, Technology, Part A, Advanced-level information for managers, technical specialists and professionals, pp: 292-320. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
23. Gregg, B.R., and Billups, G.L. 2010b. Seed conditioning (Vol. 3, Crop seed onditioning a compendium of information on physical properties and conditioning requirements of some seed kinds). CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
24. Gregory, S.R., Hernandez, E., and Savoy, B.R. 1999. Cottonsed processing, pp: 793-823, in: Cotton, origin, technology and production, by: Wayne Smith, C. and Cothran, J.T. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
25. Halloin, J.M. 1975. Solute loss from deteriorated cottonseed: relationship between deterioration, seed moisture and solute loss. Crop Sci. 15: 11-15.
26. Halloin, J.M. 1986. Withering: changes in planting seed quality between ripening and harvest, pp: 475-481, In: Cotton physiology, By: Mauney, J.R., Stewart, J.McD., Brown, J.M. (eds.), The Cotton Foundation, Pub. USA.
27. Hamidi, A. 2013. Study on effect of quality related parameters in planting cottonseed delinting processes of Sahel cultivar at Golestan province. Research Final Report, Pub. No. 4311, Ministry of Jihadie-Agriculture Agricultural Research Education and Extensions Organization (AREEO), Seed and Plant
Certification and Registration Institute (SPCRI), (In Persian).
28. Hamidi, A., Arefi-Naderi, A., Forghani, S.H., Vafaei-Tabar, M., Arabsalmani, M., and Hakimi, M. 2012. Cotton seed production and technology. Ministry of Jihadie-Agriculture Agricultural Research Education and Extensions Organization (AREEO), Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute
(SPCRI), (In Persian).
29. Hampton, J.G., and TeKrony, D.M. 1995. Handbook of vigour test methods (3rd Ed.). International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). Zurich, Swirztland.
30. Hepburn, H.A., Powell, A.A., and Matthews, S. 1984. Problems associated with the routine application of electrical conductivity measurements of individual seeds in the germination testing of pea and soybean. Seed Sci. Technol. 12: 403-413.
31. Hibbard, R.P., and Miller, E.V. 1928. Biochemical studies on seed viability. I. Measurements of conductance and reduction. Plant Physiol. 3: 335-352.
32. Hopper, N.W., and McDaniel, R.G. 1999. The cotton seed. In: cotton, orgin, history, technology and production, pp: 289-317, Wayne Smith, C., and Cothren, J.T. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, lnc.
33. Hughs, S.E., Simpson, C.L., Perkins, H.H., and Grag, C.K.Jr. 1994. Cotton
processing and utilization. In: Encyclopedia of agricultural science, Vol. 1, AD, pp: 495-524, By: Arntzen, C.J. and Ritter, E.M. (eds.) Academic Press.
34. ISTA. 2013. Hand book for seedling evaluation (3rd Ed.). International Seed Testing Association, Zurich, Switzerland.
35. ISTA. 2015. International rules for seed testing. International seed testing association, Zurich, Switzerland.
36. Khadi, B.M., Santhy, V., and Yadav, M.S. 2010. Cotton: an introduction, In: Cotton, biotechnological advances, By: Brawale Zehr, U. (Ed.), pp: 1-14. Springer.
37. Khah, E.M., and Passam, H.C. 1994. Sensitivity of seed of cotton cv Zeta-2 to damage during acid-delinting. Plant Var. Seeds. 7: 51-57.
38. Kreig, D.R., and Carroll, J.D. 1978. Cotton seedling metabolism as influenced by germination temperature, cultivar and seed physical properties. Agron. J. 70: 21-25.
39. Leffler, H.R. 1986. Developmental aspects of planting seed quality, In: Cotton physiology, pp: 465-474, By: Mauney, J.R., Stewart, J.McD., Brown, J.M. (eds.), The cotton foundation, Pub. USA.
40. Matthews, S., and Bradnock, W.T. 1968. Relationship between seed exudation and field emergence in peas and French beans. Hort. Res. 8: 89-93.
41. May, O.L., and Lega, K.E. 1999. Development of world cotton industry. In: Cotton, origin, technology and production, pp: 65-98, By: Wayne Smith, C., and Cothran, J.T. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
42. Mayfield, W.D., Anthony, W.S., Hughs, S.E., and Lalor, W.F. 1999. Ginning, In: Cotton, origin, technology and production, pp: 683-708, By: Wayne Smith, C. and Cothran, J.T. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
43. McDonald, M.B., and Copeland, L. 1997. Seed production, principles and practices. Chapman and Hall, U.S.A.
44. Murugesan, P., and Vanangmudi, K. 2003. Upgrading marginal seed lots of cotton cultivars by specific gravity separation. Madras Agric. J. 90(1-3): 91-96.
45. Pettigrew, W.T., and Meredith, W.R. 2009. Seed quality and planting date effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and fiber quality. The J. Cotton Sci. 13: 37-47.
46. Presley, J.T. 1958. Relation of protoplast permeability to cotton seed viability and predisoption to seedling disease. Plant Dis. Rep. 42: 852.
47. Scott, S.J., Jones, R.A., and Williams, W.A. 1984. Review of data analysis methods for seed germination. Crop Sci. 24:1192-1199.
48. Steere, W.C, Levengood, W.C., and Bondie, J.M. 1981. An electronic analyzer for evaluating seed germination and vigour. Seed Sci. Technol. 9: 567-576.
49. Steiner, J.J. 1990. Seedling rate of development index: indicator of vigor and seedling growth response. Crop Sci. 30: 1264-1271.
50. Styles, B. 2003. Effects of seed processing methods on germination and early seedling development of cotton. Emergent Genetics Inc.
51. Van Gastel, A.J.C., Pagnotta, D.M., and Porceddu, E. 1996. Seed science and technology, ICARDA, ALEPPO, SYRIA.
52. Watson, H., and Helmer, J.D. 1964. Cottonseed quality as affected by ginning process-a progress report. USDA, ARS 42-107 Dec. 1964.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 177 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 135 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب