| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,085 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,428 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 48,756,102 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 79,273,893 |
ارزیابی صفات مورفولوژیکی و عملکرد در واریته های جدیدپنبه | ||
| پژوهش های پنبه ایران | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 3، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 5، خرداد 1394، صفحه 119-132 اصل مقاله (272.18 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijcr.2016.106079 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمدحسین انتصاری1؛ محمدرضا زنگی* 2؛ محمدرضا داداشی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی‌ارشد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرگان | ||
| 2عضو هیئت علمی موسسه تحقیقات پنبه کشور | ||
| 3عضو هییت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرگان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| افزایش عملکرد در واحد سطح و همچنین معرفی ارقام جدید پنبه، یکی از مهمترین اهداف محققان میباشد. اهداف مهم دراین برنامه شناخت واریتههای برتر از نظر عملکرد میباشد. بدین منظور آزمایشی با ارقام تجاری و جدید پنبه شامل: ارقام جدید B557، T3، T2، SB35، و ارقام تجاری ارمغان، گلستان و ساحل در قالب طرح بلوک کامل تصادفی در ایستگاه تحقیقات پنبه کارکنده مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد که واریته T2 با 4/2159 کیلوگرم در هکتار بیشترین عملکرد را داشت. واریته SB35 با 6/1805 کیلو گرم در هکتار دارای کمترین عملکرد کل بود. گروهبندی صفت درصد زودرسی نشان داد که واریتههای B-557 با 8/75 درصد، واریته T2 با 6/74 درصد و واریته T3 با 5/73 درصد، به ترتیب زودرس ترین واریتههای مورد مطالعه در این تحقیق بودند. رقم ارمغان با 8/53 و واریته SB35 با 7/55 درصد، دیررسترین ارقام در بین واریتههای مورد مطالعه بودهاند. مقایسه میانگین وزن سی قوزه واریتههای مورد آزمایش نشان داد که از نظر این صفت، رقم گلستان با 2/172 گرم، رقم ارمغان با 1/162 گرم، رقم ساحل با 2/183 گرم، واریته SB35 با 9/172 گرم، واریته T2 با 1/177 گرم و واریته B-557 با 0/169 گرم دارای سنگینترین غوزهها بودهاند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| پنبه؛ ارقام جدید؛ عملکرد؛ خواص کمی و کیفی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of the morphological and yield traits in the new varieties of cotton | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad hosein Entesari1؛ Mohammad reza Zangi2؛ Mohammad Reza Dadashi3 | ||
| 1M.Sc. Student, Gorgan Islamic Azad University | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Cotton Research Institute of Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Prof., Gorgan Islamic Azad University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Yield increasing and also the introduction of new varieties of cotton is one of the main goals of researchers. The important goal of this research was recognition of superior varieties in terms of yield. New and cultivated cotton genotypes including new varieties B557, T3, T2, SB35 and commercial cultivars like Moghan, Golestan and Sahel were evaluated in a randomized complete block design in Karkandeh Cotton Research Station. The results showed that T2 variety with 2160 kg/ha had the highest yield and SB35 variety with 1806 kg/ha had the lowest yield. Variety of B-557 with 75.8 % and varieties of T2 and T3 with 73.5 and 74.6 % were the earliest genotypes, respectively. Late maturity among varieties belonged to Armaghan and SB35 varieties with 53.8 and 55.7 %, respectively. The highest and lowest bolls weight were related to Golestan cultivar with 183.2g and T3 genotype with 153/8g, respectively | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cotton, New varieties, Yield, Boll weight, quantity and quality traits | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Ahmad, S., Ahmad, S., Ashraf, M., Khan, N.I., and Iqbal, N. 2008. Assessment of yield-related morphological measures for earliness in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pak. J. Bot., 40(3): 1201-1207.
2. Ali, C.R., Arshad, M., Khan, M.I., and Fzal, M. 2003. Study of earliness in commercial cotton (G. hirsutum L.) genotypes. J. Res. Sci., 14 (2): 153-157.
3. Anonymous. 1993. Evaluation of the distribution of parts for cotton cultivation. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture. Iran. Report No: 29. (In Persian).
4. Arshad, M., Hanif, M., Noor, I., and shah, S.M. 1993. Correlation studies on some commercial cotton varieties of G. hirsutum. Sarhad J. Agric. 9(1): 49-53.
5. Baloch, M.J., and Baloch, Q.B. 2004. Plant characters in relation to earliness in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), In Proc Pak Acad Sci., (41):103-108.
6. Bednarz, C.W., Bridges, D.C., and Brown, S.M. 2000. Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities. Agron. J. 92: 128-135.
7. Chetten, K. 2013. Phenotypic correltation and regression analysis of yield and fibre traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M.Sc thesis submitted through department of plant breeding and genetics Sindh Agriculture University Tando Jam.
8. Desalegn, Z., Ratanadilok, N., and Kaveeta, R. 2009. Correlation and heritability for yield and fiber quality parameters of Ethiopian cotton. Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci., 43(1): 1-11.
9. Efe, L., Killi, F., and Mustafayev, A.S. 2013. An evaluation of some mutant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties from Azerbaijan in southeast anatolian region of Turkey African J. Biotch, 12(33):5117-5130.
10. Ghajari, A., Galeshi, S., and Zeinali., A. 2000. The effect of plant density on the vegetative and reproductive growth and yield of three varieties of cotton. M.Sc. Thesis. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. (In Persian).
11. Godoy, A.S., and Palermo, G.A. 2004. Genetic analysis of earliness in upland cotton G. hirsutum. I. Morphological and phonological variables. Euphytica. 105(2): 155-160.
12. Hake, D.A., Bharad, G.M., Kohale, S.K., and Nagdeve, M.B. 1992. Effect of plant population on growth and yield of pre-monsoon cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) under drip irrigation system. Indian J. Agron. 37(2): 393-395.
13. Hulugalle, N.R., Entwistle, P.C., Roberts, G., and Finlay, L.A. 2001. Allelopathic behavior of grain legumes in cotton-based farming systems. CRC for Sustainable Cotton Production, NSW Agriculture, Narabry.
14. Jatoi, W.A., Baloch, M.J., Panhwar, A.Q., Veesar, N.F., and Panhwar, S.A. 2012. Characterization and identification of early maturing upland cotton varieties. Sarhad J. Agric. 28 (1): 53-56.
15. Jian GL., Ma, C., Zheng, CL., and Zou, YF. 2003. Advances in cotton breeding for resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium wilt in the last fifty years in China. Agricultural sciences in China, 2: 280-288.
16. Jost, P.H., and Cothren, J.T. 2000. Growth and yield comparison of cotton planted in conventional and ultra–narrow row spacing. Crop Sci. 40: 430-435.
17. Jost, P.H., and Cothren, J.T. 2001. Phenotypic alteration and crop maturity differences in ultra–narrow row conventionally paced cotton. Crop Sci. 41:1150-1159.
18. Karademir, E., Karademir, C., Ekinci, R., Baran, B., and Sagirc, A. 2012. Effect of Verticillium dahliae Kleb on cotton yield and fiber technological properties. International Journal of Plant Production, 6 (4): 387-408.
19. Khajehpoor, M.R. 1991. Production of industrial plants. Isfahan University of Technology. 250 pp. (In Persian).
20. Khochaki, E. 1994. Agriculture in the dry lands. Mashhad University. (Translated in Persian).
21. Khochaki. E., Hoseini, M., and Nasiri Mahalati., M. 1997. The relationship between water and soil in crops. Mashhad University. (In Persian).
22. Kohel, R.J., and Lewis, C.F. 1984. Cotton. Publishers Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
23. Mahla, S.V.S., and Singh, I.P. 1988. Possibilities of commercial exploitation of cotton hybrids (Gossypium hirsutum) correlation studies. Agricultural Science Digest, India, 8(1): 22-26.
24. Naseri, F. 1995. Cotton. Asten Qods Razavi Company Press. Mashhad. (In Persian).
25. Rahaman, S., Ahmad, M., Ayub, M., and Amin, M. 1991. Genetic architecture of yield components in cotton (G. hirsutum). Sarhad J. Agric. 7(2): 113-128.
26. Rao, M. A. 2013. Identification of early maturing cotton genotypes and relationship between yield and fibre traits. MSc thesis submitted through department of plant breeding and genetics Sindh Agriculture University Tando Jam.
27. Rauf, S., Shah, K.N., and Afzal, I. 2005. A genetic study of some earliness
related characters in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).Caderno de Pesquisa Ser. Bio. Santa Cruz do Sul., 17(1): 81–93.
28. Ray, L.L. 1970. Breeding cotton varieties for narrow row production, proc. Belt wide cotton production. Res. Conf. p. 57.
29. Sarmadnia, G.H., and Kochaki, E. 1990. Crop physiology. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. 467 pp. (In Persian).
30. Shakeel, A., Farooq, J., Ali, M.A., Riaz, M., Farooq, A., Saeed, A., and Saleem, M.F. 2011. Inheritance pattern of earliness in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Aust. J. Crop Sci., 5(10): 1224-1231.
31. Smart, J.R., Coleman, R.J., and King, E.G. 1995. Effect of cotton row spacing and variety in the lower Rio Grande valley. National Cotton Council. Memphis, USA.
32. Soltani, A., and Galeshi, S. 2002. Importance of rapid canopy closure for wheat production in a temperature sub-humid environment: experimentation and simulation. Field Crops Res. 77: 17 -30.
33. Tunis, G.H., Baloch, M.J., Lakho, A.R, Arain, M.H., and. Chang, M.S. 2002. Earliness comparison of newly developed cotton strains with commercial varieties. Sindh Bal. J. Pl. Sci.,(4): 78-81.
34. Verma S.K., Tuteja, O.P., Koli, N.R., Singh, J., and Monga, D. 2006. Assessment of genetic variability nature and magnitude of character association in cytotype genotypes of uplan cotton (Gosyspium hirsutum L.), J. Indian Sci..cotton Improv., 31(3): 129-133.
35. Weir, B.L. 1996. Narrow row cotton distribution and rationale proceedings. Belt wide cotton conferences. Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 1: 65-66.
36. Yazdi Samadi., B., and Abde-Mishani., S. 1991. Crop breeding. Center of Tehran University Publications. (In Persian).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 372 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 448 |
||