- همه نشریات
- نشریات علمی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویچ کشاورزی
- مجلات ترویجی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- سایر نشریات سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- نشریات علمی انجمن ها
- علوم آب و خاک
- علوم اقتصاد و ترویج کشاورزی
- علوم جنگل, مرتع و آبخیزداری
- علوم دامی و شیلات
- علوم زراعی و باغی
- علوم گیاهپزشکی
- علوم مهندسی و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی
- نشریات با زبان انگلیسی
- نشریات با زبان فارسی
- نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
- نشریات علمی
پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 283 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 81 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,726 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,042 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 28,016,282 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,244,572 |
بررسی پراکنش مکانی Amaranthus retroflexus و Solanum nigrum در شرایط مختلف کنترل علف‌های‌هرز | ||
| پژوهش های کاربردی زراعی | ||
| دوره 33، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 129، اسفند 1399، صفحه 128-145 اصل مقاله (849.93 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/aj.2021.127751.1432 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی قنبری1؛ مریم آریان مهر* 2 | ||
| 1هیات علمی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد | ||
| 2دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد- دانشکده کشاورزی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این پژوهش، اثر روش کنترل شیمیایی، تلفیق کنترل شیمیایی و مکانیکی و شاهد علف‌های‌هرز بر پراکنش مکانی گونه‌های تاج‌خروس ریشه قرمز و تاج‌ریزی سیاه در مزرعه ذرت مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. قطعه زمینی به ابعاد 21×25/56 متر انتخاب و هر یک از روش‌های مورد بررسی در یک‌سوم زمین اجرا شد. شمارش تراکم گونه‌های موردمطالعه در ابتدا و پایان فصل رشد ذرت در محل شاخص‌هایی که به فاصله 5/2×87/1 در زمین تعبیه‌شده بودند، انجام شد. در هر مرحله شمارش گونه‌ها از 270 نقطه انجام شد. بررسی پراکنش مکانی گونه‌ها، با استفاده از تکنیک‌های آمار مکانی و تحلیل واریوگرام صورت گرفت. مدل واریوگرام برازش داده‌شده به تراکم گونه‌ها در ابتدا و پایان فصل رشد و در هر سه شرایط کنترل علف‌های‌هرز، با توجه به درصد خطای RMSE در اغلب موارد با مدل کروی مطابقت داشت. تطابق با مدل کروی ثبات مکانی لکه‌های علف‌های هرز را نشان می‌دهد. اعمال کنترل تلفیقی موجب کاهش دامنه تأثیر تاج‌خروس ریشه قرمز و تاج‌ریزی سیاه در پایان فصل رشد به ترتیب حدود 5/15 متر (48 درصد) و 8/2 متر (30 درصد) شد. درحالی‌که در شاهد علف‌های‌هرز دامنه تأثیر این گونه‌ها به ترتیب حدود 5/0 متر (6 درصد) و 2 متر (17 درصد) در پایان فصل رشد افزایش یافت. در کنترل شیمیایی نیز دامنه تأثیر تاج‌خروس ریشه قرمز در پایان فصل رشد 68/0 متر کاهش و دامنه تأثیر تاج‌ریزی سیاه 60/0 متر افزایش یافت. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| توزیع لکه‌ای علف های هرز؛ کنترل تلفیقی؛ کنترل شیمیایی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Spatial distribution of Amaranthus retroflexus and Solanum nigrum under different weed control methods | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| ali ghanbari1؛ maryam arianmehr2 | ||
| 1Faculty member of ferdowsi university | ||
| 2دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد- دانشکده کشاورزی | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction In each farm field and over time due to the long-term use of inputs and varied tillage practices as well as different management operations, the factors affecting plant yield would be complex (Liu et al., 2013). The impacts of these factors are not usually taken into consideration in farm management. For example, the herbicides are usually applied uniformly based on the mean weed pressure in the field. Uniform management in situations where there is spatial variation, not only will not be economically efficient but also will have detrimental environmental consequences. Cardina and Doohan (2008) reported that although weeds are often dense in some parts of the field, their density is not independent of each other. In other words, their density depends on the sampling distance of species. Identifying weed distribution on the farm is a necessary step before site-specific management. Site-specific management is in the direction of sustainable agricultural purposes. This thereby highlights the importance of the study of the spatial distribution of weeds. The aim of this study was to investigate the spatial distribution of pigweed and nightshade under different weed control methods. Materials and Methods This experiment was conducted at the experimental station of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad during the growing season of 2016. A plot of field measuring 56.25 × 21 m was selected and maize S.C 704 was planted in it. Each control method including chemical control, integrated control (mechanical+chemical) and weedy control was applied to one-third of the field. Data collected from sampling at 270 points based on a 1.87×2.5 m grid at two stages at the first and the last of corn growth season (30 and 90 days after corn planting). Amaranthus retroflexus and Solanum nigrum species had more than 96% density of total weeds. The evaluating of the spatial distribution of weed species was done by a geostatistical analysis of the species counts. The principal tool of geostatistics is the variogram (Goudy et al., 2001). The function showed in equation (1) links the expected squared difference of a variable between any two places: equation (1) Where z(x) and z(x + h) are random variables at positions x and x + h. h is the distance of pair of points. Validation of the variogram model was determined by (equation 2) that calculating the root mean square error (RMSE): equation (2) Results and Discussion According to the percentage of RMSE error, The fitted variogram models to density pigweed and nightshade were most often in accordance with the spherical model in integrated control, chemical control and weedy control at the beginning and end of the growing season. This result, in addition to indicating a patchy distribution of species, also showed that this structure in species has been preserved after mechanical and chemical control. In the integrated control, the range of pigweed and nightshade, decreased about 15.5 m (48%) and 2.8 m (30%), at the end of the growing season respectively, while in the weedy control, the range of these species increased about 0.5 m (6%) and 2 m (17%) at the end of the growing season, respectively. In the chemical control the range of pigweed decreased about 0.68 m, and the range of nightshade, increased about 0.6 m at the end of the growing season of corn. Conclusion The results of many studies indicate a patchy distribution of weeds. In this study, the patchy structure of weeds remained even after mechanical and chemical control of weeds. It can be said mechanical and chemical control of weeds destroy around of patches of weeds, but the center of the weed patches remains. Also in this study, the range of species was affected by weed control methods so that integrated control of weeds decreased the range of pigweed and nightshade and chemical control of weeds prevented expanding the range of pigweed. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| chemical control, integrated control, patchy distribution of weeds | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abaspour, M., and Rezvani Moghaddam, P. 2003. Critical period of corn weed control in Mashhad conditions. Iranian Agricultural Research 2(2): 182-195 (In Persian). Bhaskar, A. V., Lovera, K. R., Davies, W., and Cannon, N. 2014. Weed prevalence under organic and low-input cultivation systems. Aspects of Applied Biology 125: 129-134. Cambardella, C.A., Moorman, T.B., Novak, J.M., Parkin, T.B., Karlen, D.L., Turco, R.F., and Konopka, A.E. 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Sciences. soil Science sosiety of america journal 58(5): 1501–1511. Cardina, J., Sparrow, D. H., and McCoy, E. L. 1995. Analysis of spatial distribution of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till soybean (Glycine max). Weed science 258-268. Chauhan, B. 2013. Effect of tillage systems, seeding rates, and herbicides on weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice systems in the Philippines. Crop Protection 54: 244-250. Cressie, N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data.Wiley, New York, NY, 900 pp. Eshrafi, A., Banayan Aval, M., and Rashed Mohasel, M.H. 2003. Study of Spatial Dynamics of Weed Populations in Corn Field Using Geostatistic. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research 1(2): 139-154. (In Persian). Ghanbari, A., Afshari, M., and Mohammadabadi, A. A. 2011. Estimation of weed competition in maize (Zea mays L.) by using function of inverse weight of individual plants and relative leaf area of weeds. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research 9(3): 428-437 (In Persian). Goovaerts, P. 1999. Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89(1): 1-45. Gringarten, E. and Deutsch, C. V. 2001. Teacher's aide variogram interpretation and modeling. Mathematical Geology, 33(4): 507-534. Hasani Pak, A.S. 1999. Geostatistical. Third Edition, Tehran University Press, Tehran. 314 p. (In Persian). Henkel-Johnson, D., Macdonald, S. E., Bork, E. W., and Thomas, B. R. 2016. Influence of weed composition, abundance, and spatial proximity on growth in young hybrid poplar plantations. Forest ecology and management, Elsevier Science, 362: 55-68. Hyndman, R.J., and Koehler, A.B. 2006. Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International journal of forecasting, 22(4): 679-688. Jamieson, P. D., Porter, J. R., and Wilson, D. R. 1991. A test of the computer simulation model ARCWHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Fields Crop Research, 27:(4) 337–350. Kochaki, A., Zarifketabi, H., and Nakhforoush, A. 2001. Translation. Weed management in agroecosystems: Ecological approaches. First Edition, Altieri, M., and Liebman, M. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Publications, Mashhad. 458 p (In Persian). Makarian, H., Abasdokht, H. 2014. The effect of different management methods on spatial-temporal distribution of weed population and Saffron biomass. Journal of Crop Production Research, 21(2):107-124 (In Persian). Morhart, C., Sheppard, J. Seidl, F. and Spiecker, H. 2013. Influence of different tillage systems and weed treatments in the establishment year on the final biomass production of short rotation coppice poplar. Forests, 4(4): 849-867. Nassiri Mahalati, M., Koocheki, A., and Jahani, M. 2014. Estimating within field variability of wheat yield using spatial variables: An approach to precision ariculture. Journal of Agroecology 8(3):329-345, (In Persian). Pannacci, E., and Tei, F. 2014. Effects of mechanical and chemical methods on weed control, weed seed rain and crop yield in maize, sunflower and soyabean. Crop protection, 64:51-59. Saghafian, B., Danesh Kar Araste, P., Rahimi Bandar Abadi, S., Mohamadzade, M., and Fattahi, E. 2008. Guideline of spatial distribution of climatological factors using point data. Adjutancy of Strategic planning and monitoring of President, 585: 133-1. San Martín, C., Milne, A., Webster, R., Storkey, J., Andújar, D., Fernández-Quintanilla, C., and Dorado, J. 2018. Spatial analysis of digital imagery of weeds in a maize crop. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 61(7):1-20. Schuster, I., Nordmeyer, H., and Rath, T. 2007. Comparison of vision-based and manual weed mapping in sugar beet. Biosystems engineering, 98(1):17-25. Senarathne, S. H., and Sangakkara, R. U. 2009. Effect of different weed management systems on the weed populations, and seedbank composition and distribution in tropical coconut plantations. Weed biology and management, 9(3):209-216. Theisen, G. and Bastiaans, L. 2015. Low disturbance seeding suppresses weeds in no‐tillage soyabean. Weed Research, 55(6):598-608. Vasic, V., Orlovic, S., Pap, P., Kovacevic, B., Drekic, M., Pajnik, L. P. and Galic, Z. 2015. Application of pre-emergence herbicides in poplar nursery production. Journal of forestry research, 26(1):143-151. Weaver, S. 1985. Geographic spread of Datura stramonium in association with soybeans and maize in Ontario, Canada. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1985 British Crop Protection Conference–Weeds. Webster, R., and Oliver, M. 2007. Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Second Edition, John Willy and Sons. INC Architecture and Design, New York City.330p. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 339 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 182 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب