(2011). Effect of Land Treatment on Remediation of Soil Contaminated by Oil Drilling Base Mud. , 25(3), 255-264. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2011.126490
. "Effect of Land Treatment on Remediation of Soil Contaminated by Oil Drilling Base Mud". , 25, 3, 2011, 255-264. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2011.126490
(2011). 'Effect of Land Treatment on Remediation of Soil Contaminated by Oil Drilling Base Mud', , 25(3), pp. 255-264. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2011.126490
Effect of Land Treatment on Remediation of Soil Contaminated by Oil Drilling Base Mud. , 2011; 25(3): 255-264. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2011.126490

Effect of Land Treatment on Remediation of Soil Contaminated by Oil Drilling Base Mud

پژوهش های خاک
Volume 25, Issue 3, December 2011, Pages 255-264    PDF (360.33 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22092/ijsr.2011.126490
Abstract
Recently, oil total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) are considered important sources of environmental contamination. One of the effective ways to eliminate this contamination from soils is land treatment method i.e. treatment of the contaminated soil by ventilation and provision of better bacterial living condition. Oil substances used for drilling oil wells have caused soil contamination in Khuzestan Province. Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate some remediation methods to decrease soil contamination by oil. A randomized complete design study was conducted with three treatments including control (no ventilation), O1 (daily ventilation), O2 (every four days ventilation). The study was done in pots using soils contaminated by oil drilling base mud for 10 weeks. Carbon dioxide concentration (as an index of microbial activity) and TPHs amounts were measured after 2, 5, and 10 weeks for each treatment. Results showed that ventilation treatment significantly (p<0.05) increased microbial activity compared with the control. Carbon dioxide concentrations in O1 and O2 treatments were, respectively, 16 and 20 percent more than the control. Also, TPHs in O1 and O2 were, respectively, 7.7 and 11.7 percent lower than the control. It can be concluded that land treatment (ventilation in this study) can be used as an effective method for remediating soil contaminated by oil drilling bas mud. 
Keywords
Land treatment; Microbial activitiy; Oil contamination; Base mud
References
  1. رنگ­زن، ن. 1385. بررسی نقش گیاهان در پالایش خاک­های آلوده به گازوئیل. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شهید چمران.ص100-1.
  2. بسالت­پور، ع.ا.، حاج عباسی، م.ع.، درستکار،و.، ترابی، غ.، 1389، اصلاح خاک های آلوده به هیدرو کربور های نفتی به روش تر کیبی، مجله علوم و فنون کشاورزی ومنابع طبیعی ،علوم آب و خاک، سال چهارم، شماره پنجاه وسوم، صفحات 129-142.
  3. Alef, K., and P. Nannipieri. 1995. Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry, Harcourt brace & company (Eds), 214-216.
  4. Anderson, W.G. 1989. Wettability literature survey: Part 3. The effects of wettability on the electrical properties of porous media, Petro Technol.1371-1378, Dec.
  5. Ayotamuno, M., J., Kogbara, R.B., Ogaji, S.O.T., and Probert, S.D. 2006. Bioremediation of a Crude oil Poulluted Agricultural _ Soil at Port Harcort, Nigeria. Applied Energy, 85:1249-1257.
  6. K. Gogoi, N.N. Dutta, P. Goswami and T.R. Krishna Mohan. 2003. A case study of bioremediation of petroleum-hydrocarbon contaminated soil at a crude oil spill site, Adv. Environmental Research, 7:767–782.
  7. Coulon, F., Pelletier, E. and L. Gourhant. Effects of nutrient and temperature on degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated sub-antarctic soil. Chemosphere, 58:1439-1448.
  8. Christopher, S. H., Marsden, P. J., and A.S. Sharleff. 1988, Evaluation of methods 3540 (soxhlet) and 3550 (sonication) for evaluation of appendix LX analyses from solid samples. S-CUBED, Report for EPA contract 68-03-33-75, work assignment No.03, Document No. SSS-R-88-9436.
  9. Dibble, J. T. and R. Bartha. 1979. Effect of environmental parameters on the biodegradation of oil sludge, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, pp:729-739.
  10. Franco, C. M. M., Clarke, P. J., and M. E. Tate. 2000. Studies on non-wetting sands: Hydrophobic properties and chemical characterization of natural water-repellent materials, J.Hudrol, 3:253-263.
  11. Gagni, S. and D Cam. 2007. Stigmastane and hopan as conserved biomarkers for estimatin oil biodegradation in a former refinery plant-contaminated soil. Chemosphere, 67:1975-1981.
  12. Geller, A. Michels, J., Track, T., Gehrke, U., and D. Sell, 2002. Grundlagen derbiologischen bodensanierung, Biologigische verfahren zar Bodensansanerung, UBA, Berline.
  13. Goi, A., N. Kulik, and M.Trapido. 2006. Combined chemical and biologicaltratment of oil contaminated soil. Journal of chemosphere.63:1754-1763.
  14. Hallet, P. D., A. R. Dexter and J. P. K. Seville. 1995. Identification of preexisting cracks on soil fracture surfaces using dye. Soil till, Res, 33:163-184.
  15. Harmsen, J. 1991. Possibilities and limitation of land farming for cleaning contaminated soils. In: olfenbuttel, R.F.H. (Eds), On-site bioremediation process for xenobiotic and hydrocarbons treatment. Butterwort-Hetmann, Stoneham, MA, pp. 215-272.
  16. Harvey Particia, J., B. F. Campenella and P. M. L. Castro. 2002. Phytoremediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons, Anilines and Phenols, Environmental Science and Pollution, Res 9:29-47.
  17. Korboulewsky, N., Bonin, G., and C. Massiani. 2002. Biological and ecophisiological reaction of white wall rocket (Diplotaxis erucoides L. grown on biosolid compost. Environmetal Pollution, 117: 365-370.
  18. Leo, R., B. Jastorff and D.Leo. 1982. Afnahme und beseithudi von use transport-und Loschunfallen im watt-srrand der kust, Froschungsoricht Teil2, Bundesministerium fur Forschung und Technologie.
  19. Morelli, S., M. T. Del Panno, G. L. De Antoni and M. T. Painceira. 2005. Laboratory study on the bioremediation of petrochemical sludge contaminated soil. International Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 55:271-278.
  20. Namkong, W., E. Y Hwang and, J. S. Park. 2002. Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil with composting. Environmental Pollution, 119:23-31.
  21. Ouyang, W., H. Liu, V. Murygina, and Y. Yongyong. 2005. Comparison of bio-auugmentation and composting for remediation of oily sludge: A field-scale study in china, Process Biochemistry, 40:3763-3768.
  22. Pachmann, J., R. Horton., and P. R. Van der poleg. 2000. Modified sessible drop method for assessing initial soil-water contact angle of sandy soil. soil science, 64: 564-567.
  23. Pope, D.F., and J.E. Matthews. 1993. Bioremediation using the land treatment consept. USEPA/600/R-93/194. Robert S. Kerr, environmental Research Laboratory. US Environmental Protection Agency.
  24. Sotsky, J.B., C. W. Greer and R. W. Atlas.1994. Frequency of Genes in Aromatic and Alphatic hydrocarbon Biodegradation pathways with in Bacterial population from Alaskan sediments. Y., Microbial, 40: 981-985.
  25. S. EPA 510-B-95-007. 1994. How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies for Underground Storage Tank Sites: A Gide for Corrective Action Plane Reviedwers. Chapter 5. OUST’s publication.
Statistics
Article View: 132
PDF Download: 168


counter
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb