- همه نشریات
- نشریات علمی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویچ کشاورزی
- مجلات ترویجی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- سایر نشریات سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- نشریات علمی انجمن ها
- علوم آب و خاک
- علوم اقتصاد و ترویج کشاورزی
- علوم جنگل, مرتع و آبخیزداری
- علوم دامی و شیلات
- علوم زراعی و باغی
- علوم گیاهپزشکی
- علوم مهندسی و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی
- نشریات با زبان انگلیسی
- نشریات با زبان فارسی
- نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
- نشریات علمی
پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 283 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 81 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,728 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,071 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 28,679,420 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,303,998 |
ارزیابی هیدرولیکی دو سامانه آبیاری بارانی (لینیر) در طول فصل زراعی در دشت قزوین | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی سازه های آبیاری و زهکشی | ||
| دوره 22، شماره 85، فروردین 1401، صفحه 59-74 اصل مقاله (515.23 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/idser.2022.357720.1499 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهدی یونسی1؛ محمود مشعل* 2؛ افشین یوسف گمرکچی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد؛ گروه مهندسی آب ، دانشکدگان ابوریحان، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه مهندسی آب ، دانشکدگان ابوریحان، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان قزوین، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با استفاده نادرست از سامانه‌های آبیاری، خود این سامانه‌ها باعث بروز تلفات آبیاری و هدررفت آب می‌شوند. ارزیابی سامانه‌های آبیاری در طول بهره‌برداری و رفع ایرادهای آن می‌تواند از بروز چنین اتفاقاتی جلوگیری به عمل آورد. هدف تحقیق حاضر ارزیابی دو سامانه آبیاری تحت فشار (لینیر) در یک مزرعه واقع در ایستگاه تحقیقات می‌باشد. به این منظور از شاخص‌های ضریب یکنواختی کریستیانسن (CU)، یکنواختی توزیع در ربع پایین (DU)، راندمان پتانسیل کاربرد در ربع پایین (PELQ) و راندمان واقعی در ربع پایین (AELQ) استفاده شده است. نتایج ارزیابی میدانی براساس شاخص CU و DU نشان داد میانگین این شاخص‌ها در سامانه آبیاری تحت کشت گندم به ترتیب برابر با 38/89 و 92/83 درصد و در سامانه آبیاری تحت کشت کلزا برابر با 85/76 و 31/70 درصد است. همچنین از منظر PELQ و AELQ میانگین سامانه آبیاری تحت کشت گندم به ترتیب برابر با 89/62 درصد و در سامانه آبیاری تحت کشت کلزا برابر با 33/49 درصد بوده است. در یک نگرش کلی هر دو سامانه براساس شاخص‌های ارزیابی CU و DU در بازه قابل قبول قرار دارد در حالی که براساس مقادیر محاسباتی دو شاخص PELQ و AELQ، در خارج از بازه قابل قبول قرار داردند که نشان‌دهنده عدم مدیریت صحیح بهره‌بردار از سامانه‌های مورد مطالعه می‌باشد. پایین بودن شاخص‌های ارزیابی سامانه‌های آبیاری تحت فشار مذکور نشان‌دهنده آن است که در صورت عدم توجه به عوامل تأثیرگذار در طی دوره بهره‌برداری نمی‌توان انتظار ارتقاء بازده آبیاری را مکانیزه نمودن آبیاری متصور دانست. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ارزیابی هیدرولیکی؛ سامانه آبیاری لینیر؛ قزوین | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Hydraulic Evaluation of two Sprinkler Irrigation Systems (Linear) During the Growing Season in Qazvin Plain | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mahdi Younesi1؛ Mahmoud Mashal2؛ afshin uossef gomrokchi3 | ||
| 1Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant professor, Department of Water Engineering, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Qazvin Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Qazvin, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Restrictions on water resources in the country prevent agricultural development. Pressurized irrigation systems are one of the management strategies to improve productivity and use of water resources. However, by improperly using these systems, these systems themselves cause irrigation losses and water loss. Evaluation of irrigation systems during operation and resolving its defects can prevent such incidents. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate two pressurized irrigation systems (Linier) in a field located in the research station so that the effects of tendency to an efficient irrigation system in increasing water use efficiency index or reducing water losses have been investigated. For this purpose, Kristiansen uniformity coefficient (CU), low quadrant distribution uniformity (DU), low quadrant application potential efficiency (PELQ) and low quadrant real efficiency (AELQ) have been used. The results of field evaluation based on CU and DU showed that the mean of these indices in wheat irrigation system was 89.38% and 83.92% and in rapeseed irrigation system was 76.85% and 70.31%, respectively. Also, from the perspective of potential efficiency (PELQ) and real (AELQ), the average water application of wheat irrigation system was 62.89% and in canola irrigation system was 49.33%, respectively. In a general view, both systems are in an acceptable range based on CU and DU evaluation indicators, while based on the computational values of PELQ and AELQ indices, they are outside the acceptable range, indicating the lack of proper management of the exploiter of the studied systems. The low evaluation indicators of the mentioned pressure irrigation systems indicate that in the absence of attention to the factors affecting during the operation period, it is not possible to expect the improvement of irrigation efficiency to mechanize the perceived irrigation. The operation of pressurized irrigation systems is dependent on several factors, each of which can be effective in the efficiency of an irrigation system. In such a way that cases such as inappropriate design of an irrigation system, disproportionate operation conditions and climatic conditions governing the region, lack of pressure management and other effective parameters during the operation period can affect the efficiency of an irrigation system. On the other hand, an irrigation system is a set of independent components that the proper or inappropriate function of each of these components can affect the efficiency of an irrigation system. In this regard, considering the location of agricultural meteorological station in the vicinity of the fields, some of the factors affecting the efficiency of an irrigation system in two crops were investigated, and the results of hydraulic evaluation of irrigation systems showed that the low evaluation indicators during the operation period were based on factors such as the constant of the average speed of movement of the irrigation system during the whole growth period (which caused deep penetration). The lack of the same height for sprinklers in the irrigation system, the presence of relatively high wind speeds in the region (which causes evaporation and wind blowing of water droplets), not following the proper diameter of sprinkler nozzles during the irrigation system spans (which causes the non-identical distribution of water at the farm level) and the old sprinklers of the irrigation system noted. Evaluation and analysis of field information obtained from the mentioned farms showed that one of the best and most effective factors in improving the performance of the system is recording and analyzing field information during the operation period. In such a way that by monitoring the effective factors such as the function of the system, optimal irrigation management can be applied at the irrigation system level and consequently at the farm level. In addition, inflexibility in irrigation management program and adaptation to operation conditions have also been one of the factors reducing the efficiency of the studied irrigation system. However, in case of more flexibility of irrigation management and compliance with the conditions of the operation period, we can expect improvement in irrigation system performance. However, there are mainly several problems in the field of system management and promotion of technical knowledge of operation. In a general approach, the low evaluation indicators of the irrigation systems under the mentioned pressure indicate that in the absence of attention to the factors affecting during the operation period, it is not possible to expect the improvement of irrigation efficiency to mechanize the perceived irrigation. This means that the efficiency of mechanized irrigation systems such as Linier irrigation system and other irrigation systems (drip and sprinkler) varies in a wide range, which in case of not paying attention to the factors affecting during the operation and design of the system, in some cases, the expected efficiency of these mechanized irrigation systems will not be obtained. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Hydraulic Evaluation, Linear Irrigation System, Qazvin | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadali, K., Hamdi, Y., HosseiniPazhouh, N. & Pourmohseni, A.A. (2018). Assessment of sprinkler irrigation systems with emphasis on performance criteria and operation problems. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 48(5), 1043-1052.
Ashraf, N., Mirzaei, F. & Mohammadbeigi, A. (2015). Hydraulic Evaluation Center-pivot Sprinkler Irrigation System and Solid-set Irrigation System with Portable Sprinkler (Case Study: Teaching and Research farm of Tehran University). Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 46(2), 353-361.
Bahrami, M., Khagehei, F., Dindarlou, A. & Dastourani, M. (2017). Technical evaluation sprinkler irrigation system implemented in some of the fields in Fars province. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 24(1), 311-317.
Dargahi, Z., Nazari, B., Ramezani Etedali, H. & Mazandranizadeh, H. (2018). Evaluation of Modern Irrigation Systems Based on Economic Water Productivity and Irrigation Efficiency Indices in Qazvin Province. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 12(3), 683-695.
Kaghazloo, A., Sotoodehnia, A. & Daneshkar Arasteh, P. (2015). Evaluating implemented linear sprinkler irrigation systems (Linear) in Qazvin Plain. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 5(1), 129-137.
Karimi, M. & Jalini, M. (2016). Guidelines for Evaluation of Center pivot Irrigation System Performance (Technical note). Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 2(2), 85-91.
Keller, J. & Blienser, R.D. (1990). Sprinkle and Trickle Irrigation. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA.
Khodamoradi, J. & Moradi, S. (2011). Evaluation of spray uniformity (CU) irrigation systems implemented In the city of Sarpul Zahab. 1st National Conference on Meteorology and Agricultural Water Management. Nov. 22-23. College of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Tehran University. Iran. (In Persian).
Liaghat, A., Mokari Ghahroodi, E., Noory, H. & Sotoodehnia, A. (2015). Evaluation of Qazvin Plain Irrigation Systems Through an Assessment of Classical vs Neoclassical Irrigation Efficiencies. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 46(2), 343-351.
Lopez, E., Tarjuelo, M., & Daminguez, A. (2010). Effect of Irrigation Uniformity of the Profitability of Crops. Agricultural Water Management; 98(1): 190-198.
Markley, P. & Allen, G. (2004). Sprinkle and Trickle Irrigation Lecture Notes (First Edition). Utah State University, Utah, USA
Merriam, J.L. & Keller, J. (1978). Farm Irrigation System Evaluation: A Guide for Management. Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Naderi, N., Ghadami Firouzabadi, A. & Froumadi, M. (2018). Technical Evaluation of Different Sprinkler Irrigation Systems in Field Condition. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture (Soil and Water Sci.), 32(3), 429-440.
Rolland, L. (1982). Mechanized sprinkler irrigation (No. 35). Food & Agriculture Organization | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 168 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 135 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب