| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,074 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,301 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 47,138,498 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 78,044,221 |
مقدار آب سمپاشی بهینه برای کاربرد تریفلوسولفورون-متیل علیه تاج‌خروس ریشه قرمز | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 37، شماره 2، مهر 1400، صفحه 193-206 اصل مقاله (1.17 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2022.357013.1294 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| اکبر علی وردی* 1؛ نسرین زنده پاک2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران. | ||
| 2دانش آموخته کارشناسی شناسایی و مبارزه با علف های هرز، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| انتخاب درست مقدار آب برای تهیه محلول سمپاشی، روشی در جهت بهینهسازی کارایی علفکش شاخ و برگ مصرف است ولی تأثیر آن بر کارایی تریفلوسولفورون-متیل مشخص نیست. از این‌رو، در آزمایشی در گلخانه تحقیقاتی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا در تابستان سال 1396، شش مقدار تریفلوسولفورون-متیل (سافاری) شامل (صفر، 1/125، 2/25، 4/5، 9 و 18 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار) با 10 مقدار آب سمپاشی (60، 80، 120، 160، 200، 240، 320، 400، 480 و 640 لیتر آب در هکتار که به‌ترتیب با کمک نازل بادبزنی استاندارد با شمارههای 1100075، 11001، 110015، 11002، 110025، 11003، 11004، 11005، 11006 و 11008 حاصل شد) روی تاج‌خروس در مراحل رشدی یک، دو و سه برگی، پاشیده شدند. در آزمایشی مزرعهای، مقدار 18 گرم تریفلوسولفورون-متیل در هکتار با 10 مقدار آب سمپاشی مذکور در مرحله رشدی دو الی سه برگ تاج‌خروس پاشیده شد. در مرحله یک برگی، کمترین و بیشترین مقدار تریفلوسولفورون-متیل لازم برای گیاه‌سوزی 50 درصدی (ED50) با شماره نازلهای 1100075 و 11008 به‌ترتیب برابر 2/15 و 15/31 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار به‌دست آمد. در مرحله دو برگی، کمترین و بیشترین مقدار (ED50) با شماره نازلهای 1100075 و 11008 به‌ترتیب برابر 2/98 و 12/16 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار به‌دست آمد. در مرحله سه برگی، کمترین مقدار (ED50) با شماره نازلهای 1100075 و 11001 به‌ترتیب برابر 3/86 و 3/37 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار حاصل شد. ولی بیشترین مقدار آن با شماره نازلهای 11004، 11005، 11006 و 11008 به‌ترتیب برابر 8/51، 8/70، 9/62 و 9/84 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار به‌دست آمد. در کل، نتایج آزمایش مزرعهای مشابه آزمایش گلخانهای بود و ثابت کرد که برای کنترل بهتر تاج‌خروس با تریفلوسولفورون-متیل به مقدار آب سمپاشی کمتری نیاز است، یعنی هر چقدر قطرات پاشش ریزتر و غلیظتر بودند، کارایی تریفلوسولفورون-متیل علیه تاج‌خروس بیشتر بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| چغندرقند؛ حجم پاشش؛ علفکش؛ علف‌هرز | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Optimal spray water volume for application of triflusulfuron-methyl against redroot pigweed | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| A. Aliverdi1؛ N. Zendehpak2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor in Weed Science, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. | ||
| 2Bachelor’s Degree in Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Choosing the exact amount of water to prepare the spraying solution is a method to optimize the efficiency of the foliage herbicide, but its effect on the efficency of triflusulfuron-methyl is not known. Therefore, in a study in the Research Greenhouse of Bu-Ali Sina University in the summer of 2017, six doses of triflusulfuron-methyl (Safary®) including 0, 1.125, 2.25, 4.5, 9, and 18 g a.i. ha-1 were sprayed with 10 amounts of spraying water (60, 80, 120, 160, 200, 240, 320, 400, 480, and 640 L water ha-1 with the help of a standard fan nozzle with 1100075, 11001, 110015, 11002, 110025, 11003, 11004, 11005, 11006 and 11008 sizes, respectively) on redroot pigweed at 1-, 2- and 3-leaf stages. In a field experiment, triflusulfuron-methyl at 18 g a.i. ha-1 was sprayed with ten amounts of the above-mentioned spraying water at 2 to 3-leaf growth stage. At the one-leaf stage, the minimum (2.51 g a.i. ha-1) and maximum (2.51 g a.i. ha-1) dose of triflusulfuron-methyl required for 50% desiccation (ED50) with nozzle sizes of 1100075 and 11008. At two-leaf stage, the minimum and maximum values of ED50 were obtained with nozzle sizes of 1100075 and 11008 equal to 2.98 and 12.16 g a.i. ha-1, respectively. At the three-leaf stage, the lowest value of ED50 were obtained with nozzle sizes of 1100075 and 11001 equal to 3.86 and 3.37 g a.i. ha-1, respectively. However, the highest ED50 values was obtained with nozzle sizes of 11004, 11005, 11006 and 11008 equal to 8.51, 8.70, 9.62 and 9.54 g a.i. ha-1, respectively. Overall, results of the field experiment were similar to the greenhouse experiment and showed that less amount of spraying water is needed to better control redroot pigweed with triflusulfuron-methyl; means that application of triflusulfuron-methyl against redroot pigweed is more effective using the smaller and thicker spray droplets. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Herbicide, Spray water volume, Sugar beet, Weed | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Agrotop. Catalogue. https://www.agrotop.com/Katalog_109E/mobile/index.html (accessed 20 Oct. 2021) Aliverdi A, Karami S. The effect of type and size of single, twin, and triplet flat fan nozzles on the activity of cycloxydim against wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum Koch.). Journal of Plant Protection. 2019; 33: 465-474. (In Persian with English abstract)Aliverdi A, Karami S. The effect and elimination of the settled soil on jimsonweed’s shoot on efficacy of clopiralid. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2020; 36: 107-115. (in Persian, abstract in English) Aliverdi A, Borghei SM. The effect of spray pattern and volume on haloxyfop-r-methyl efficacy against wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum). Journal of Plant Protection. 2021; 35: 265-278. (in Persian with English abstract)Aliverdi A, Sharifi M. Interaction effect between nozzle type and application time of day on the efficacy of paraquat to control velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medicus.). Journal of Plant Protection. 2020; 34: 113-23. (in Persian with English abstract) ASJ. Catalogue. http://www.asjnozzle.it/index.php/en/downloads/category/catalogues (accessed 20 Oct. 2021) Berger ST, Dobrow MH, Ferrell JA, Webster TM. Influence of carrier volume and nozzle selection on palmer amaranth control. Peanut Science. 2014; 41: 120-123. Brown L, Soltani N, Shropshire C, Spieser H, Sikkema PH. Efficacy of four corn (Zea mays L.) herbicides when applied with flat fan and air induction nozzles. Weed Biology and Management. 2007; 7: 55-61. Buhler DD, Burnside OC. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Science. 1984; 32: 574-583. Butts TR, Samples CA, Franca LX, Dodds DM, Reynolds DB, Adams JW, Zollinger RK, Howatt KA, Fritz BK, Clint HW, Kruger GR. Spray droplet size and carrier volume effect on dicamba and glufosinate efficacy. Pest Management Science. 2018; 74: 2020-2029. Chandrasena NR, Sagar GR. Fluazifop toxicity to quackgrass (Agropyron repens) as influenced by some application factors and site of application. 1989; 37: 790-796. Creech CF, Henry RS, Fritz BK, Kruger GR. Influence of herbicide active ingredient, nozzle type, orifice size, spray pressure, and carrier volume rate on spray droplet size characteristics. Weed Technology. 2015; 29: 298-310.FAO. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed 20 Oct. 2021) Ferreira MC, Machado-Neto JG, Matuo T. Reduction in the rate and spray volume in night-time application of post-emergence herbicides on soybean crop. Planta Daninha, 1998; 16: 25-36. Gauvrit C, Lamrani T. Influence of application volume on the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl and fenoxaprop-P-ethyl on oats. Weed Research. 2008; 48: 78-84. Green JM. Interaction of surfactant dose and spray volume on rimsulfuron activity. Weed Technology. 1996; 10: 508-511. Grichar WJ, Dotray PA. Influence of spray tip and spray volume on the efficacy of imazapic and imazethapyr on selected weed species. American Journal Experimental Agriculture. 2015; 8: 75-86.Hager AG, Wax LM, Bollero GA, Stoller EW. Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology. 2003; 17: 14-20. Hardi. Catalogue. https://myhardi.com.au/index.php/manuals/931-parts-and-components/file (accessed 20 Oct. 2021) Knoche M. Effect of droplet size and carrier volume on performance of foliage-applied herbicides. Crop Protection. 1994; 13: 163-178. Lesnik M, Kramberger B, Vajs S. The effects of drift-reducing nozzles on herbicide efficacy and maize (Zea mays L.) yield. Zemdirbyste. 2012; 99: 371-378. McMullan PM. Effect of spray volume, spray pressure and adjuvant volume on efficacy of sethoxydim and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl. Crop Protection. 1995; 14: 549-554.Mayo CM, Horak MJ, Peterson DE, Boyer JE. Differential control of four Amaranthus species by six postemergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology. 1995; 9:141-147.Meyer CJ, Norsworthy JK, Kruger GR, Barber TL. Effect of nozzle selection and spray volume on droplet size and efficacy of Engenia tank-mix combinations. Weed Technology. 2016; 30: 377-390.Mirshekari B. Efficiency of empirical competition models for simulation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield at interference with redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.). Journal of Sugar Beet. 2009; 24(2): 73-91. (in Persian, abstract in English) Nelson KA, Renner KA, Penner D. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control and tuber yield with glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technology. 2002; 16: 360-365. Patten K. Smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) control with imazapyr. Weed Technology. 2002; 16: 826–832.Ramsdale BK, Messersmith CG. Drift-reducing nozzle effects on herbicide performance. Weed Technology. 2001; 15: 453-460.Richard EP. Optimizing diluent volume improves Johnson grass control in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) with asulam. 1991; 5: 363-368. Ritz C, Baty F, Streibig JC, Gerhard D. Dose-response analysis using R. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0146021. Rytwo G, Tropp D. Improved efficiency of a divalent herbicidein the presence of clay, by addition of monovalent organocations. Applied Clay Science. 2001; 18: 327-333. Schumacher CE, Hatterman- Valenti HM. Effect of dose and spray volume on early-season broadleaved weed control in Allium using herbicides. Crop Protection. 2007; 26: 1178-1185. Sikkema PH, Brown L, Shropshire C, Spieser H, Soltani N. Flat fan and air induction nozzles affect soybean herbicide efficacy. Weed Biology and Management. 2008; 8: 31-38.Shaw DR, Morris WH, Webster EP, Smith DB. Effects of spray volume and droplet size on herbicide deposition and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control. Weed Technology. 2000; 14: 321-326. Skuterud R, Bjugstad N, Tyldum A, Terresen KS. Effect of herbicides applied at different times of the day. Crop Protection. 1998; 17: 41-46. Šoštarˇci´c V, Collavo A, Masin R, Bari´c K, Š´cepanovi´c M. Barnyard grass shows sensitivity to reduced doses of topramezone at different growth stages. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2019; 21: 486-490. Soroka SV, Gadzhieva GJ. State of weed infestation and features of sugar beet protection in Belarus. Matica Srpska Journal for Natural Sciences. 2006; 110:165-172. Wang H, Guo W, Zhang L, Zhao K, Ge L, Lv X, Liu W, Wang J. Multiple resistance to thifensulfuron-methyl and fomesafen in redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) from China. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2017; 77: 311-317. Zand E, Nezamabadi N, Baghestani MA, Shimi P, Mousavi SK. A guide to chemical control of weeds in Iran. Jihad-e-Daneshgahi Press. Mashhad. 2019. pp. 154. (In Persian) Zand E, Heidari A, Mousavi SK. Herbicides and their application methods, with the approach of optimizing and reducing consumption. Jihad-e-Daneshgahi Press. Mashhad. 2015. pp 552. (In Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 521 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 471 |
||