| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,034 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,949 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,413,692 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 68,788,336 |
ارزیابی تحمل تنش خشکی در ژنوتیپ های گندم نان (.Triticum aestivum L) زمستانه دیم | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 37، شماره 4، دی 1400، صفحه 425-451 اصل مقاله (1.64 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/sppi.2022.358999.1258 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مظفر روستائی* 1؛ جعفر جعفرزاده1؛ رسول اسلامی2 | ||
| 1موسسه تحقیقات کشاورزی دیم، سازمان‌تحقیقات،آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، مراغه، ایران. | ||
| 2بخش تحقیقات غلات موسسه تحقیقات کشاورزی دیم، سازمان‌تحقیقات،آموزش وترویج کشاورزی، مراغه، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور ارزیابی تحمل به تنش خشکی در ژنوتیپ‌های گندم نان زمستانه تعداد 48 ژنوتیپ (لاین و رقم) در دو محیط دیم و آبیاری تکمیلی در دو سال زراعی (99- 1397)درایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی دیم مراغه ارزیابی شدند. هرآزمایش در هر محیط در قالب طرح بلوک های کامل تصادفی با دو تکرار اجرا شد.تجزیه واریانس داده ها نشان داد که اثر سال، ژنوتیپ و اثر متقابل سال × ژنوتیپ بر تعداد روز تا ظهور سنبله، تعداد روزتا رسیدگی فیزیولوژیکی، دوره پرشدن دانه، ارتفاع گیاه، وزن هزاردانه، عملکرد دانه، عملکرد بیولوژیکی و شاخص برداشت معنی دار بود. میانگین عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ‌ها در شرایط دیم 1707 کیلوگرم در هکتار بود. بیشترین عملکرد دانه در شرایط دیم به ترتیب مربوط به ژنوتیپ‌های شماره 4، 23، 20 و 26 با 2080، 2066، 2035 و 1999 کیلوگرم در هکتار بود و در شرایط آبیاری تکمیلی به ترتیب به ژنوتیپ‌های شماره 13، 7، 11 و 25 با 3044، 3014، 2943 و 2914 کیلوگرم در هکتار تعلق داشت. آبیاری تکمیلی موجب افزایش 738 کیلوگرم عملکرد دانه در هکتار، هشت سانتیمتر ارتفاع گیاه، سه گرم وزن هزار دانه و چهاردرصد شاخص برداشت شد. همبستگی معنی‌داری بین عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ‌ها در شرایط دیم و آبیاری تکمیلی مشاهده نشد. همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌داری بین عملکرد دانه و شاخص‌های MP، GMP، HM، STIو YIدر شرایط دیم و آبیاری تکمیلی مشاهده شدکه بیانگر مناسب بودن این شاخص‌ها برای انتخاب ژنوتیپ‌هایی با عملکرد دانه مطلوب در هر دو شرایط می‌باشند. بر اساس نتایج تجزیه به مولفه‌های اصلی و نمودار سه بعدی، ژنوتیپ‌های20، 23 و 26 به عنوان ژنوتیپ‌های متحمل به خشکی با عملکرد بالادر هر دو شرایط دیم و آبیاری تکمیلی و ژنوتیپ‌های 13، 7، 11، 25 و 32 برای شرایط آبیاری تکمیلی شناسایی شدند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| گندم نان؛ عملکرد دانه؛ عملکرد بیولوژیک؛ وزن هزاردانه؛ شاخص تحمل به تنش خشکی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of Drought Tolerance in Rainfed Winter Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| M. Roustaii1؛ J. Jafarzadeh1؛ R. Eslami2 | ||
| 1Dryland Agricultural Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Maragheh, Iran. | ||
| 2Dryland Agricultural Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Maragheh, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| To study drought tolerant in rainfed winter bread wheat genotypes, 48 genotypes (lines and cultivars) were evaluated under two rainfed and supplementary irrigation conditions at Maragheh research field station, Maragheh, Iran, in2018-19 and 2019-20 cropping cycles. The results of combined analysis of variance showed that effects of years, genotypes and year × genotype interaction on day to heading, day to physiological maturity, grain filling duration, plant height, 1000-grainweight, biological yield, grain yield and harvest index were significant. The average grain yield of genotypes under rainfed conditions was 1707 kg ha-1. The highest grain yield under rainfed conditions related to genotypes no. 4, 23, 20 and 26, respectively, with 2080, 2066, 2035 and 1999 kgha-1.under supplementary irrigation conditions genotypes No. 13, 7, 11 and 25 with 3044, 3014, respectively, with 2943 and 2914 kgha-1 had the highest grain yield. Supplementary irrigation increased mean grain yield by 738 kg ha-1, mean plant height by eightcm, mean 1000 grain weight by three grams and mean harvest index by four percent. Drought stress reduced grain yield of all genotypes. No significant correlation was observed between grain yield of genotypes under rainfed and supplementary irrigation conditions. Positive and significant correlations were observed between MP, GMP, HM, STI and YI with grain yield (Ys) under rainfed and supplementary irrigation (Yp) conditions which indicated the suitability of these indices for selection of genotypes with reasonable grain yield under either conditions. Based on the results of principal component analysis and three-dimensional diagram, genotypes 20, 23 and 26 were identified as drought tolerant genotypes with reasonable yield in both rainfed and supplementary irrigation conditions. Genotypes 13, 7, 11, 25 and 32 were also identified suitable for supplementary irrigation conditions. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Bread wheat, grain yield, biological yield, 1000 grain weight and drought stress tolerance index | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abou-Elwafa S. F., 2016. Association mapping for yield and yield-contributing traits in barley under drought conditions with genome-based SSR markers. Comptes Rendus Biologies 339 (5):153-162.
Ahmadizadeh, M., Valizadeh, M., Shahbazi, H., and Nori, A. 2012. Behavior of durum wheat genotypes under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions in the greenhouse. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(8): 1912-1923.
Ahmed, I. M., Nadira, U. A., Zang, G., and Wu, F. 2016. Exploration and utilization of drought-tolerant barley germplasm. pp. 115-152. In: Zhang, G., and Li, C. (eds.) Exploration, identification and utilization of barley germplasm. Elsevier Inc.
Anwar J, M. Subhani, G., Hussain, M., Ahmad, J., Hussain, M., and Munir, M. 2011. Drought tolerance indices and their correlation with yield in exotic wheat genotypes. PakistanJournal of Botany 43 (3): 1527-1530.
Asadi, H., Neyshabouri, M., and Seiyadat, H. 2003. Determining the susceptibilityof wheat to water stress at different stages ofgrowthin Karaj. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences (3): 579-586 (in Persian).
Blum, A. 2005. Drought resistance, water use efficiency and yield potential: are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1159- 1168.
Bouslama, M., and Schapaugh, W. 1984. Stresstolerance in soybeans. I. Evaluation of thre escreening techniques for heat and droughttolerance. Crop Science 24: 933-937.
Ehsani, M., and Khaledi, H. 2003. Water productivity in agriculture. Iranian National Committee of Irrigation and Drainage. 115 pp.
Farshadfar, E., Poursiahbidi, M. M., and Safavi, S. M. 2018. Assessment of drought tolerance in landraces of bread wheat based on resistance/tolerance indices. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research1:143-158.
Fernandez, G. C. J. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. pp. 257-270. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. 13-16 Aug. 1992.Shanhua, Taiwan.
Fernandez, G. C. J. 1993. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. pp. 257-270. In: Kuo, C. G. (ed.) Adaptation of food crops to temperature and water stress. AVRDC, Shanhua, Taiwan.
Fischer, R., and Maurer, R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29: 897-912.
Fox, D. N., and Rosielle, A. 1982. Reducing the influence of environmental main effects of plant breeding environments. Euphytica 31: 645-656.
Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campanile, R., Ricciardi, G., and Borghi, B. 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 77: 523-531.
Golabadi, M., Arzani, A., and Mirmohammadi Maibody, S. A. M. 2008. Evaluation of Influence of late-season moisture stress on yield and morpho-physiological characteristics of F3 families of durum wheat. Iranian Agriculture Research 6: 405- 418.
Khanna-Chopra, R., and Singh, K. 2015. Drought resistance in crops: physiological and genetic basis of traits for crop productivity. pp. 267-292. In: Tripathi, B. N., and Müller, M. (eds.) Stress Responses in Plants. Springer.
Koocheki, A. R., Sorkhi Lalehloo, B., and Eslamzadeh-Hesari, M. R. 2012. Yield stability of barley elite genotypes in cold regions of Iran using GGE biplot. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 28-1(3): 533-543 (in Persian).
Mahmoodi, H. 2019. Climate data of DARI research stations in 2018-2019 cropping season.
Mahmoodi, H. 2020. Climate data of DARI research stations in 2019-2020 cropping season.
Maleki, A., Babaei, F., Cheharsooghi Amin, H., Ahmadi, J., and Asadi Dizaji, A. 2008. The study of seed yield stability and drought tolerance indices of bread wheat genotypes under irrigated and non-Irrigated conditions. Research Journal of Biological Sciences 3(8): 841-844.
Maleki, A., Saba, J., and Shekari, F. 2009. Inheritance of relative water content in wheat leaf (Triticum aestivum L.) under dryland conditions. Journal of Agricultural Knowledge19 (2): 183-177 (in Persian).
Mirzova, K., Holaskova, E., Oz, M. T., Jiskrova, E., Frebort, I., and Galuszka, P., 2016. Transgenic barley: a prospective tool for biotechnology and agriculture. Biotechnology Advances 32: 137-157.
Mohammadi, R., Roostaei, M, Haghparast, R., Roohi, E., Kazemi, S., Ahmadi, M.M., Abediasl, G., and Amri, A. 2010. Genotype × environment interaction for grain yield in rainfed winter wheat multi-environmental trials in Iran. Agronomy Journal 102 (5): 1500-1510.
Mohseni, M., Mortazavian, S. M. M., Ramshini, H. A.و and Foghi, B. 2015. Evaluation of drought tolerance in some wheat genotypes based on selection indices. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 13 (3): 524-542 (in Persian).
Najafian, G., 2009. Drought tolerance indices, their relationships and manner of application to wheat breeding programs. Middle Eastern and Russian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 3 (1): 25-34.
Oweis, T., Pala, M., and Ryan, J. 1998. Stabilizing rainfed wheat yields with supplemental irrigation and nitrogen in a Mediterranean climate. Agronomy Journal 90: 672-681.
Oweis, T., Salkini, A., Zhang, H., Ilbeyi, A. Hustun, H. Dernek, Z., and Erdem, G. 2001. Supplemental irrigation potential for wheat in the central Anatolian plateau of Turkey, ICARDA. 37 pp.
Roostaei, M., Sadeqzadeh, D., Hasanpour-Hosni, M., Zadhasan, I., Rezaei, R., Eslami, R., Abdiasl G., Soleimani, K., Roohi, I., Sanjari, A., Hesami, A., Nadermahmodi, K., Haghparast, R., Aghaee M., Ahmadi, M. M., Daryei, A., Afshari, F., Torabi, M., Dehghan, M., and Mardokhi, V. 2013. Tak-Ab, a new winter bread wheat cultivar for supplementary irrigation conditions in cold dryland areas of Iran. Research Achievements for Field and Horticulture Crops 2 (3): 177-186 (in Persian).
Rosielle, A., and Hamblin, J. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science 21: 943-946.
Sangi S. A., Najafi A., Chghamieza K., and Mohammadi, R. 2022. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in durum wheat (Triticumdurum L.) genotypes. Environmental Stresses in Agricultural Sciences 14 (4): 911-901 (in Persian).
Samarah, N. H. 2005. Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of barley. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25: 145- 149.
Schneider, K. A., Rosales Serna, R., Ibarra Perez, F., Cazares Enriquez, B., Acosta Gallegos, J. A., Ramirez Vallejo, P., Wassimi, N., and Kelly, J. D. 1997. Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Science 37: 43-50.
Sio-SeMardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Postini, K. and Mohammadi, V. 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research 98: 222-229.
Sun, H. Y., Liu, C. M., Zhang, X. Y., Shen, Y. J., and Zhang, Y. Q. 2006. Effects of irrigation on water balance, yield ofsummer maize under minimum irrigation in the North China Plain. Agronomy 98: 1620-1626.
Tavakkoli, A. R. 2004. Effect of supplementary irrigation and different rate of nitrogen on grain yield and yield completive in Sabalan cultivar. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal (19): 367-380 (in Persian).
Tavakkoli, A. R., and Owise, T. Y. 2002. The role of supplemental irrigation and nitrogen in producing bread wheat in the highlands of Iran. Agricultural Water Management 65: 225-236.
Xu, N., Fok, M., Li, J., Yang, X., and Yan, W. 2017. Optimization of cotton variety registration criteria aided with a genotype- by-trait biplot analysis. Scientific Reports 7: 1-10.
Yan, W., and Fregeau-Reid, J. 2018. Genotype by yield × trait (GYT) Biplot: a novel approach for genotype selection based on multiple traits. Scientific Reports 8: 1-10.
Yan, W., and Rajcan, I. 2002. Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science 42: 11–20.
Yan, W., and Kang, M. S. 2003. GGE Biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL, USA. 286 pp.
Zhang, X. Y., Pei, D., Chen, S. Y., Sun, H. Y., and Yang, Y. H. 2006. Performance of double-cropped winter wheat –summer maize under minimum irrigation in the North China Plain. Agronomy 98: 1620-1626.
Li., Z. Z. Li, W. D., and Li, W. L. Li. 2004. Dry-period irrigation and fertilizer application affect water use and yield of spring wheat in semi- arid regions. Agricultural Water Management 65 (2): 133-143.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 400 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 373 |
||