| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,027 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,815 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,178,847 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 57,795,035 |
واکاوی سازوکارهای دانشی بهره‌برداران در حفاظت و احیای مراتع در مراتع شهرستان جاجرم استان خراسان شمالی | ||
| تحقیقات حمایت و حفاظت جنگلها و مراتع ایران | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 20، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 39، مهر 1401، صفحه 163-180 اصل مقاله (828.7 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijfrpr.2022.357665.1536 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمدحسن شکوهی1؛ بهاره بهمنش* 2؛ امین محمدی استادکلایه2 | ||
| 1دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد علوم و مهندسی مرتع، دانشگاه گنبد کاووس، گنبد کاووس، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه گنبد کاووس، گنبد کاووس، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این تحقیق با هدف واکاوی سازوکارهای دانشی بهره‌برداران در حفاظت و احیای مراتع شهرستان جاجرم استان خراسان شمالی به صورت پیمایشی انجام شد. جامعۀ آماری آن شامل 84 نفر از بهره‌برداران مرتعی در قالب 5 طرح مرتعداری بود که همه آن‌ها به عنوان نمونه و به روش سرشماری انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته بود که طی مصاحبه با 10 بهره‌بردار خبره به روش گلوله برفی صورت پذیرفت. نتایج نشان داد که دانش حفاظتی و احیایی بهره‌برداران مرتعی در منطقه مورد مطالعه در سطح 99 درصد اطمینان تفاوت معنی‌داری داشته و دانش حفاظتی آن‌ها بیشتر از دانش احیایی‌شان در مدیریت مرتع بوده است. یافته‌های حاصل از آمارۀ والد و برآورد احتمال تأثیر رگرسیونی نشان داد، متغیرهای سابقه در دامداری، میزان وابستگی به مراتع و شرکت در دوره‌های آموزشی و ترویجی بر میزان دانش حفاظتی و احیایی بهره‌برداران در مراتع اثر مثبت و معنی‌دار و متغیر سطح سواد نیز اثر منفی و معنی‌دار دارد. به طوری که متغیرهای مستقل توانسته‌اند، 1/31 درصد از تغییرات واریانس دانش بهره‌برداران در مراتع را برآورد نمایند (311/0=R2 McFadden). با توجه به این که پایداری مرتع تحت تأثیر سطح دانش و آگاهی دامداران به برنامه‌های حفاظتی، احیایی و اصلاحی و به دنبال آن میزان مشارکت بهره‌برداران مرتعی به عنوان ذینفعان اصلی مراتع می‌باشد، می‌توان از طریق برنامه‌های آموزشی و جلسات متمرکز سعی در انتقال دانش بومی و تجربیات و الگوهای موفق در سایر مناطق به بهره-برداران نمود تا سطح دانش آن‌ها در راستای سیاست‌های مدیریت پایدار مرتع به ایده‌آل نسبی برسد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مرتع؛ مرتعداران؛ تخریب؛ مشارکت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis of knowledge mechanisms of pastoralists in the conservation and rehabilitation of rangelands in the Jajarm city, Northern Khorasan province | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Hasan Shokouhi1؛ Bahareh Behmanesh2؛ Amin Mohammadi Ostad Kalayeh2 | ||
| 1Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The object of this study was to investigate the knowledge mechanisms of pastoralists in the conservation and rehabilitation of rangelands in the Jajarm city of North Khorasan province. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire that was interviewed by 10 experienced pastoralists using the snowball method. The results showed that the conservation and restorative knowledge of rangeland pastoralists in the study area had a significant difference in 99% confidence level and their conservation knowledge was more than their restorative knowledge in rangeland management. Findings from wald test showed that the variables of experiencing as stocking holders, dependence on rangelands and participation in training and participating in courses on conservation and restorative knowledge of pastoralists in rangelands were positive and significant and variable level of literacy also has a negative and significant effect. So that the independent variables were able to estimate 31.1% of the variance changes of the knowledge of pastoralists in the rangelands (R2 McFadden = 0.311). Considering that rangeland sustainability is affected by the level of knowledge and awareness of stake holders about conservation, rehabilitation and improvement programs, and consequently the level of participation of rangeland pastoralists as the main beneficiaries of rangelands, it is possible through training and focused sessions tried to transfer local knowledge and experiences and successful models in other areas to pastoralists so that their level of knowledge will improve in line with sustainable rangeland management policies to reach the relative ideal. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Rangeland, Pastoralists, Degradation, Participation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
-Azizi Khalkheli, T. and Bakhshi Jahromi, A., 2011. The ideal of farmers' soil protection behavior: the soul of communication and information media. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 7(2): 51-61 (In Persian). -Babune, G.J. and Mshuda, J.N., 2020. Sustainability of rangeland management for livestock development in Lahoda and Pangarua villages Kondoa district Tanzania. Tengeru Community Development Journal, 7(1): 1-18. -Bedunah, D.J. and Angerer, J.P., 2012. Rangeland degradation, poverty, and conflict: how can rangeland scientists contribute to effective responses and solutions?. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 65(6): 606-612. -Bruno, J.E., Leisz, S.J., Bobula, J.S. and Fernández-Giménez, M.E., 2021. Conserving working rangelands: A social–ecological case study from Northeastern Colorado. Land, 10(12): 1399. -Brunson, M.W. and Huntsinger, L., 2008. Ranching as a conservation strategy: can old ranchers save the new west?. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 61(2): 137-147. -Carbutt, C., Henwood, W.D. and Gilfedder, L.A., 2017. Global plight of native temperate grasslands: going, going, gone?. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(12): 2911-2932. -Chabwela, H. and Haller, T., 2010. Governance issues, potentials and failures of participative collective action in the Kafue Flats, Zambia. International Journal of the Commons, 4(2): 621-642. -Claassen, R., 2011. USDA conservation spending on working agricultural lands bucks long-term trend. Amber Waves, 9(3): 60-65. -Fischer, J., Abson, D.J., Butsic, V., Chappell, M.J., Ekroos, J., Hanspach, J. and Von Wehrden, H., 2014. Land sparing versus land sharing: moving forward. Conservation Letters, 7(3): 149-157. -Florianczyk, Z., Janc, K. and Czapiewski, K., 2012. The importance and diffusion of knowledge in the agricultural sector: the Polish experiences. Geographia Polonica, 85(1): 45-56. -Gedefaw, M.G., Geli, H.M. and Abera, T.A., 2021. Assessment of rangeland degradation in New Mexico using Time Series Segmentation and Residual Trend Analysis (TSS-RESTREND). Remote Sensing, 13(9): 1618. -Ghobadi, L., Moameri, M. and Abasi Khalaki, M., 2021. Factors affecting on rangelands degradation among ranchers in Namin County's rural areas. Journal Space Economy and Rural Development, 10(36): 213-234 (In Persian). -Karimi, K. and Karamidehkordi, E., 2014. Knowledge of family farmers about the importance of rangeland protection and the impact of rangeland management plans on it: a case study of Mahneshan city. 5th Iranian Congress of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences and Natural Resources, Zanjan University, Zanjan. The First International Conference on Rural Consulting Services in Asia and Oceania, pp. 333 (In Persian). -Karimi, K., Karamidehkordi, E. and Badsar, M., 2016. The role of rural communities in conservation of rangelands in Mahneshan township. Journal of Rural Development Strategies, 3(1): 1-21 (In Persian). -Karimi, S. and Saghaleini, A., 2021. What drives ranchers’ intention to conserve rangelands: the role of environmental concern (a case study of Angoshteh Watershed in Borujerd County, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science, 11(4): 419-430. -Keivan Behjou, F., Esmailnejad Onari, A. and ghanbari, S., 2021. Range management plans and production and economic of rangeland users (Case study: Nir rangelands, Ardebil Province). Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert Reserch, 28(2): 252-265 (In Persian). -Lubell, M.N., Cutts, B.B., Roche, L.M., Hamilton, M., Derner, J.D., Kachergis, E. and Tate, K.W., 2013. Conservation program participation and adaptive rangeland decision-making. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 66(6): 609-620. -Mahmoudi, J., Lotfi, S. and Mhdavi, S., 2017. The role of indigenous knowledge in the conservation, restoration, and optimization of the use of rangeland in the Khurtab Rudbar basin, the Noor county. Watershed Management Research Journal, 30(3): 53-6 (In Persian). -Mairomi, H.W. and Kimengsi, J.N., 2021. Community-based actors and participation in rangeland management. Lessons from the Western Highlands of Cameroon, Sustainability, 13(4): 1700. -Meadows, M.E. and Hoffman, T.M., 2003. Land degradation and climate change in South Africa. Geographical Journal, 169(2): 168-177. -Merenlender, A.M., Huntsinger, L., Guthey, G. and Fairfax, S.K., 2004. Land trusts and conservation easements: who is conserving what for whom?. Conservation Biology, 18(1): 65-76. -Millar, J. and Tenzing, K., 2021. Transforming degraded rangelands and pastoralists' livelihoods in Eastern Bhutan. Mountain Research and Development, 41(4): 1-7. -Mirzaei, H. and Ahmadi, F., 2021. Analyzing effective norms on pastoralists participatory behavior toward rangeland conservation (the case of study: Karimaabad watershed, Dehgolan city). Iranian Journal of Forest and Range Protection Research, 19(1): 110-124 (In Persian). -Momeni, D., Hayati, B., Dashti, G. and Rezaei, A., 2012. Factors affecting the adoption of soil mechanical conservation practices in dry lands of the Izeh township. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 42-2(4): 513-524 (In Persian). -Mosse, D., 2001. People's knowledge', participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development, Zed Books, London, UK, pp. 16-35. -Mousavi, S.A., Ghahfarokhi, M.S. ana Koupaei, S.S., 2020. Negative impacts of nomadic livestock grazing on common rangelands’ function in soil and water conservation. Ecological Indicators, 110: 105946. -Noojipady, P., Prince, S.D. and Rishmawi, K., 2015. Reductions in productivity due to land degradation in the drylands of the southwestern United States. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 1(8): 1-15. -Rahmani, R., 2018. Factors affecting ranchers' participation in the conservation activities of range management projects in Fars province. Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert Reserch, 25(3): 644-656 (In Persian). -Reid, R.S., Fernández-Giménez, M.E. and Galvin, K.A., 2014. Dynamics and resilience of rangelands and pastoral peoples around the globe. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39: 217-242. -Sainnemekh, S., Barrio, I.C., Densambuu, B., Bestelmeyer, B. and Aradóttir, Á.L., 2022. Rangeland degradation in Mongolia: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Arid Environments, 196: 104654. -Smith, M.S. and McAllister, R.R., 2008. Managing arid zone natural resources in Australia for spatial and temporal variability–an approach from first principles. The Rangeland Journal, 30(1): 15-27. -Tahmasbian, S., Momeni, M. and Najafi, F., 2012. Investigation of causes and factors of rangeland degradation and strategies to prevent rangeland degradation in Ilam province (Case study of Shirvan Chardavol city). Proceedings of the first regional conference on sustainable development of natural resources in the west of the country: Challenges and strategies, Payame Noor University, Lorestan province, pp: 1-5 (In Persian). -Toderi, M., Francioni, M., Seddaiu, G., Roggero, P.P., Trozzo, L. and D’Ottavio, P., 2017. Bottom-up design process of agri-environmental measures at a landscape scale: Evidence from case studies on biodiversity conservation and water protection. Land Use Policy, 68: 295-305. -Utaranakorn, P. and Yasunobu, K., 2016. The mutual influence of managerial ability and social networks of farmers on participation in an organic vegetable group in Khon Kaen province, Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 37(3): 127-131. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 654 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 285 |
||