اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات283
تعداد نشریات سازمان81
تعداد شماره‌ها2,726
تعداد مقالات31,042
تعداد مشاهده مقاله28,023,343
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله16,245,062
Liana, P, Jenica, A, Suciati, T, Rahmawati, E, Pariyana, P, Umar, T. P. (1402). Comparison of Liver Function Test Results between Architect C8000 and COBAS C501 Automatic Chemistry Analyzer. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 78(3), 1141-1146. doi: 10.22092/ari.2022.360419.2584
P Liana; A Jenica; T Suciati; E Rahmawati; P Pariyana; T. P Umar. "Comparison of Liver Function Test Results between Architect C8000 and COBAS C501 Automatic Chemistry Analyzer". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 78, 3, 1402, 1141-1146. doi: 10.22092/ari.2022.360419.2584
Liana, P, Jenica, A, Suciati, T, Rahmawati, E, Pariyana, P, Umar, T. P. (1402). 'Comparison of Liver Function Test Results between Architect C8000 and COBAS C501 Automatic Chemistry Analyzer', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 78(3), pp. 1141-1146. doi: 10.22092/ari.2022.360419.2584
Liana, P, Jenica, A, Suciati, T, Rahmawati, E, Pariyana, P, Umar, T. P. Comparison of Liver Function Test Results between Architect C8000 and COBAS C501 Automatic Chemistry Analyzer. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 78(3): 1141-1146. doi: 10.22092/ari.2022.360419.2584

Comparison of Liver Function Test Results between Architect C8000 and COBAS C501 Automatic Chemistry Analyzer

Archives of Razi Institute
مقاله 44، دوره 78، شماره 3، مرداد و شهریور 2023، صفحه 1141-1146    اصل مقاله (438.16 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ari.2022.360419.2584
نویسندگان
P Liana* 1؛ A Jenica2؛ T Suciati3؛ E Rahmawati1؛ P Pariyana4؛ T. P Umar2
1Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya, Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, Indonesia
2Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
3Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
4Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
چکیده
Liver function tests are frequently used to screen liver function, monitor therapy, and determine the severity of liver problems. The present study aimed to assess the consistency of the results of the liver function parameters between the two analyzers, Architect c8000 and Cobas C501. This laboratory-based analytical observational study was conducted in a cross-sectional manner. Sample collection was performed through a consecutive sampling procedure from June to December 2019 in the Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia. The research sample consisted of the liver function examination results of patients, carried out using the Architect c8000 and Roche Cobas c501 chemistry analyzers. Serum albumin, alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total protein were the studied variables. The Spearman, Mann-Whitney, and Bland-Altman tests were used to evaluate the comparison test. In total, 100 blood samples were obtained in this study. The results revealed a highly significant correlation (r>0.90, P=0<001) among the four liver function parameters. The results of the liver function parameters inspected by the two analyzers did not differ significantly (P>0.05). In addition, there was a solid agreement on all parameters, with a near-perfect level (concordance correlation coefficient>0.90) and more than 95% of data points falling within the acceptable range. The Architect c8000 and Cobas c501 analyzers produced similar results for liver function tests; hence, these devices can be used interchangeably.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Agreement test؛ Laboratory؛ Liver Function Tests؛ Medical Device
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. WHO. Good clinical diagnostic practice: a guide for clinicians in developing countries to the clinical diagnosis of disease and to making proper use of clinical diagnostic services 2005 [
  2. Teshome M, Worede A, Asmelash D. Total Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Errors and Evaluation of the Analytical Quality Control Using Sigma Metric for Routine Clinical Chemistry Tests. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:125-36.
  3. Armbruster DA, Overcash DR, Reyes J. Clinical chemistry laboratory automation in the 21st century-amat victoria curam (Victory loves careful preparation). Clin Biochem Rev. 2014;35(3):143.
  4. Nikolac Gabaj N, Miler M, Vrtaric A, Hemar M, Filipi P, Kocijancic M, et al. Precision, accuracy, cross reactivity and comparability of serum indices measurement on Abbott Architect c8000, Beckman Coulter AU5800 and Roche Cobas 6000 c501 clinical chemistry analyzers. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(5):776-88.
  5. Suwannaboot S, Ketloy C, Ganokroj P, Ujjin P. Correlation of analytical performance of automatedchemistry analyzer between Abbott Architectc8000 and Roche Cobas c501. Chula Med J. 2012;56(4):411-9.
  6. Chen F-h, Li N, Zhang W, Zhang Q-y, Wang Y, Ma Y-y, et al. A comparison between China-made Mindray BS-2000M biochemical analyzer and Roche cobas702 automatic biochemical analyzer. Front Lab Med. 2017;1(2):98-103.
  7. Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015;25(2):141-51.
  8. Pauli D, Seyfarth M, Dibbelt L. The Abbott Architect c8000: Analytical performance and productivity characteristics of a new analyzer applied to general chemistry testing. Clin Lab. 2005;51(1-2):31-42.
  9. van Gammeren AJ, van Gool N, de Groot MJ, Cobbaert CM. Analytical performance evaluation of the Cobas 6000 analyzer - special emphasis on trueness verification. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(6):863-71.
  10. Jensen AL, Kjelgaard-Hansen M. Method comparison in the clinical laboratory. Vet Clin Pathol. 2006;35(3):276-86.
  11. Doumas BT, Watson WA, Biggs HG. Albumin standards and the measurement of serum albumin with bromcresol green. Clin Chim Acta. 1971;31(1):87-96.
  12. Huang X-J, Choi Y-K, Im H-S, Yarimaga O, Yoon E, Kim H-S. Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST/GOT) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT/GPT) Detection Techniques. Sensors. 2006;6(7):756-82.
  13. Artiss JD, Strandbergh DR, Zak B. Spectral study of bichromatics: Biuret-protein and glucose-hexokinase reactions as visible-ultraviolet models for turbidity. Microchem J. 1989;40(2):152-65.
  14. Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med. 1990;20(5):337-40.
  15. Bilic-Zulle L. Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2011;21(1):49-52.
  16. Ren Z, Liu G, Huang Z, Zeng L, Shao B, editors. Research of Spectrophotometer for Bio-Chemical Analyzer Based on Automatic Adjustment of the Integration Time of Linear CCD. 2008 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering; 2008 16-18 May 2008.
  17. Duly EB, Grimason S, Grimason P, Barnes G, Trinick TR. Measurement of serum albumin by capillary zone electrophoresis, bromocresol green, bromocresol purple, and immunoassay methods. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56(10):780-1.
  18. Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99(3):309-11.
  1. Sutton A, Dawson H, Hoff B, Grift E, Shoukri M. Analyte comparisons between 2 clinical chemistry analyzers. Can Vet J. 1999;40(4):255.
  2. Namdee K, Carrasco-Teja M, Fish MB, Charoenphol P, Eniola-Adefeso O. Effect of variation in hemorheology between human and animal blood on the binding efficacy of vascular-targeted carriers. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11631.
  3. Weng X, Cloutier G, Pibarot P, Durand LG. Comparison and simulation of different levels of erythrocyte aggregation with pig, horse, sheep, calf, and normal human blood. Biorheology. 1996;33(4-5):365-77.
  4. Dogan NO. Bland-Altman analysis: A paradigm to understand correlation and agreement. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(4):139-41.
  5. Sedgwick P. Limits of agreement (Bland-Altman method). BMJ. 2013;346:f1630.
  6. Gray TE, Pratt MC, Cusick PK. Determination of agreement between laboratory instruments. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 1999;38(2):56-9.
  7. Miler M, Šimundić A-M, Štefanović M, Ferenec-Ružić D, Kvaternik M, Topić E, et al. A model for results comparison on two different biochemistry analyzers in laboratory accredited according to the ISO 15189. Biochem Med. 2009;19(3):287-93.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 883
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 152


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب