اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات283
تعداد نشریات سازمان81
تعداد شماره‌ها2,726
تعداد مقالات31,041
تعداد مشاهده مقاله27,860,340
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله16,231,696
یادگاری طاهری, طاهره, وکیل الرعایا, یونس, فائزی رازی, فرشاد, حیدریه, سیدعبدالله. (1402). مدل سازی روابط بین مؤلفه های هوشمند سازمانی برای توسعه تعاونی های تولیدی روستایی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(1), 221-249. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.356343.1410
طاهره یادگاری طاهری; یونس وکیل الرعایا; فرشاد فائزی رازی; سیدعبدالله حیدریه. "مدل سازی روابط بین مؤلفه های هوشمند سازمانی برای توسعه تعاونی های تولیدی روستایی". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26, 1, 1402, 221-249. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.356343.1410
یادگاری طاهری, طاهره, وکیل الرعایا, یونس, فائزی رازی, فرشاد, حیدریه, سیدعبدالله. (1402). 'مدل سازی روابط بین مؤلفه های هوشمند سازمانی برای توسعه تعاونی های تولیدی روستایی', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(1), pp. 221-249. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.356343.1410
یادگاری طاهری, طاهره, وکیل الرعایا, یونس, فائزی رازی, فرشاد, حیدریه, سیدعبدالله. مدل سازی روابط بین مؤلفه های هوشمند سازمانی برای توسعه تعاونی های تولیدی روستایی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 26(1): 221-249. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.356343.1410

مدل سازی روابط بین مؤلفه های هوشمند سازمانی برای توسعه تعاونی های تولیدی روستایی

روستا و توسعه
مقاله 9، دوره 26، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 101، تیر 1402، صفحه 221-249    اصل مقاله (1.31 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30490/rvt.2023.356343.1410
نویسندگان
طاهره یادگاری طاهری1؛ یونس وکیل الرعایا* 2؛ فرشاد فائزی رازی3؛ سیدعبدالله حیدریه4
1دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، سمنان، ایران
2دانشیار گروه مدیریت، مرکز تحقیقات کارآفرینی، ایده پردازی و تجاری سازی، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران.
3دانشیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران
4استادیار گروه مدیریت،واحد سمنان،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،سمنان،ایران
چکیده
هوشمندکردن تعاونی­ های تولیدی روستایی برای مقابله با تغییرات شدید محیط کسب­ وکار و به­ منظور توسعه اقتصادی بسیار پراهمیت است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی و مدل­سازی روابط بین مؤلفه­ های هوشمند سازمانی برای توسعه تعاونی­ های تولیدی روستایی است. تحقیق از منظر هدف، کاربردی و ازلحاظ ماهیت داده­ ها، آمیخته (کیفی-کمّی) است و در سال 1400 انجام شده است. بیست مؤلفه در بخش کیفی با روش داده ­بنیاد و کدگذاری از طریق ابزار مصاحبه نیمه­ ساختاریافته استخراج و سپس با روش دلفی فازی انتخاب شدند. روابط و سطح ­بندی مؤلفه­ ها در بخش کمی با روش مدل­سازی تفسیری-ساختاری انجام شد. جامعه تحقیق، خبرگان شامل مدیران وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی و وزارت جهاد کشاورزی بودند که با روش نمونه­ گیری غیراحتمالی هدفمند و تکنیک گلوله برفی به تعداد دوازده نفر تا اشباع نظری انتخاب شدند. یافته ­های تحلیل داده­ ها نشان داد که مؤلفه ­های هوشمند­سازی در دوازده سطح در مدل قرار داشتند. مؤلفه­ های «قوانین»، «حمایت ­ها و مشوق­ های دولت»، «رقابت» و «ساختار» در هوشمندی سازمانی بیشترین قدرت هدایت را داشتند که در نهایت موجب بهبود «توسعه بازار» و «توسعه رقابت» در تعاونی­ های تولیدی روستایی خواهند شد. بنابراین، می ­توان با برنامه­ ریزی مناسب برای بهبود مؤلفه­ های دارای قدرت هدایت بیشتر، به اهداف توسعه تعاونی­ های تولیدی روستایی دست یافت. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
هوشمند سازمانی؛ تعاونی های تولیدی روستایی؛ توسعه روستا
عنوان مقاله [English]
Modeling the Relationships between Organizational Intelligent Components for the Development of Rural Production Cooperatives
نویسندگان [English]
T. Yadegari Taheri1؛ Y. Vakil Alroaia2؛ F. Faezi Razi3؛ S. A. Heydariyeh4
1PhD Student in Business Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
2Associate Professor, Entrepreneurship and Commercialization Research Center, Department of Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
3Associate Prof., Department of Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
4Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction
The creation and development of small enterprises in rural areas will lead to the development and prosperity of the village economy. But in recent years, the cooperative sector has not been successful in production and services, and it seems that they are facing internal and external structural problems including weaknesses such as insufficient information, weak human resources and poor management, lack of financial resources and old technology, and issues such as acquiring knowledge and skills, better access to inputs and more effective marketing of products. These problems have made cooperative companies unable to be dynamic in their business environment and have not acted intelligently in this direction. Meanwhile, organizational intelligence is efficient and effective in the ability to solve problems and respond to the challenges of the external environment. Therefore, adaptability and organizational intelligence are essential for organizations. A company's intelligence creates intelligent activities and methods with market knowledge and environmental scanning which it uses as an adaptive tool to cope with its ever-changing environment. However, the village production cooperatives have not been able to achieve their desired goals in the competitive market due to not having an intelligent structure. Therefore, considering the acute conditions of rural production cooperatives in order to achieve the goals of sustainable development, this research was conducted with the aim of identifying and determining the dimensions and intelligent organizational components and modeling the mutual relationships for the development of rural production cooperatives.
Materials and Methods
The current research was conducted in two parts, qualitative and qualitative. In the qualitative part, the indicators, components and dimensions of the model were identified and extracted using grounded theory method and in the quantitative part, the relationships between the elements of the model were determined by the interpretive-structural modeling method. The research community of experts included the managers of Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare, and Ministry of Agriculture–Jahad, who were selected in a non-probabilistic, purposeful way and with the snowball technique in the number of 12 people until reaching theoretical saturation. The method of field data collection is through semi-in-depth interview and researcher questionnaire. The content validity of the indicators was analyzed by the Lawsheh Coefficient Method, and we used the fuzzy Delphi method to screen the components.
Results and Discussion
Organizational intelligent components for development of rural production cooperatives as follows: intelligence enablers (human intelligence, managerial intelligence, technological intelligence, strategic intelligence, technical intelligence), organizational intelligence capabilities (organizational learning, information and data, customer relationship management, intelligent thinking, process), Intelligent development contexts (infrastructure, cooperation and communication, financial, structure), intelligent governance (government support and incentives, organs and institutions, rules and regulations, competition), intelligence strategy (competition development, market development), intelligence performance (sustainable competitive advantage, productivity improvement, service improvement, rural development). The results of the quantitative part and interpretative-structural modeling showed that the components in the structural model are located at 12 levels, so that the components of "laws", " government support and incentives", "competition", and "structure" is the most effective and basic components and "competition development" and "market development" is the most impressive components for the success of organizational intelligence in rural production cooperatives.
Conclusions
Based on the results, improving the organizational intelligence of village production cooperatives depends on "market development" and "competition development". In order to improve these components, the most effective components should be improved, which in this research are "laws" and "government support and incentives", and managers should make the improvement of these components the first priority of the decision for cooperative development. This finding shows that the laws are not suitable due to the rapid changes in the business environment, and the government's support, such as the information transparency law and the creation of databases, the development of social support, and the comprehensive package of special incentives. Youth cooperatives and knowledge-based cooperatives should be improved in the field of data mining and optimal financing policies. Also, the two components "competition" and "structure" are at the second level of importance and effectiveness, and this finding shows that the creation of competition between cooperatives gives motivation to gain competition in the market, and cooperatives need to have a new structure.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Organizational Intelligence, Rural Production Cooperatives, Rural Development
مراجع
  1. Abdollahzadeh, G., Jamshidi, K.A., Hosseini, A.S. & Sharifzadeh, M. (2020). Factor influencing the own-business start-up in rural areas of Iran. Village and Development, 23(2), 113-1 [In Persian]
  2. Aidi, M. (2021). Identifying and prioritizing effective factors on rural and agricultural products marketing in Ilam province emphasizing the role of agricultural and rural cooperatives by AHP method. Co-operation and Agriculture, 9(36), 250-267. [In Persian]
  3. Bagherian Kasgari, B., Seyfi, A. & Pashazadgan, A. (2016). Evaluation of the company's employees benefit from intelligent enterprise communications infrastructure. Journal of Strategic Management Researched, 22(60), 141-158. [In Persian]
  4. Baghi, S.P. & Hosseini, S.M. (2017). A study of the role of rural cooperatives in rural development from the perspective of rural cooperative management experts in Tehran province. Journal of Cooperatives and Rural, 8(32), 117-131. [In Persian]
  5. Bolaños, R., Fontela, E., Nenclares, A. & Pastor, P. (2005). Using interpretive structural modelling in strategic decision‐making groups. Management Decision, 43(6), 877−895.
  6. Buchko, A. (2019). Managerial intelligence: A clinical perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  7. Chauhan, A., Singh, A. & Jharkharia, S. (2018). An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and decision-making trail and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method approach for the analysis of barriers of waste recycling in India. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 68(2), 100-110.
  8. Chaubey, A. & Sahoo, C.K. (2021). Assimilation of business intelligence: The effect of external pressures and top leaders commitment during pandemic crisis. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102344.
  9. (2021). Rural cooperatives. Available at: https://westazarbayjan.corc.ir/page-main/fa/0/form/pId1048. (Retrieved at: 13 December 2021. [In Persian]
  10. Daneshfard, K., Rajae, Z., Bilondi, Z.M. & Banihashem, S.A. (2016). The effect of organizational intelligence on talent management, using structural equations. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3(2), 464-476. [In Persian]
  11. Daneshmehr, H., Karimi, A. & Mahmoudi, J. (2021). Critical ethnography of self-governing policy in rural production cooperatives (Case study: Rural production cooperatives in Kurdistan province). Co-operation and Agriculture, 10(37), 43-71. [In Persian]
  12. Faryabi, M. & Ahmadvand, M. (2016). Factors related to success of rural production cooperatives in the south of Kerman province. Co-operation and Agriculture, 4(16), 103-129. [In Persian]
  13. Faryabi, M. & Ahmadvand, M. (2017). The determinants of rural production cooperatives’ performance in south of Kerman province. Journal of Rural Research, 8(3), 404-421. [In Persian]
  14. Goswami, M. (2019). Developing social intelligence among employees for effectively managing organizational change. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 5(10), 94-124.
  15. Hakemifar, A. (2015). Designing a knowledge management model in the top cooperatives of Tehran province. PhD Thesis of Agricultural Development, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Research Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University. [In Persian]
  16. Huber, G.P. (2018). Organizational intelligence. In M. Augier & D.J. Teece (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management (pp. 1211-1215). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_502
  17. Karimi, M., Faghihi, A. & Alam Tabriz, A. (2019). Identifying the components of organizational intelligence through behavioral and emotional/social approach and ranking them by interpretive structural modeling. Journal of Research in Human Resources Management, 11(1), 163-188. [In Persian]
  18. Karimi Shirazi, H., Modiri, M., Pourhabibi, Z. & Rafiei Gilevaee, A. (2017). Improving the quality of clinical dental services using the importance-performance analysis (IPA) approach and interpretive-structural modeling (ISM). Journal of Dentomaxillofacial, 6(1), 14-26.
  19. Khalili, S., Jamali, G. & Rameshi, K. (2021). A survey in the effect of green marketing strategies on competitive advantage of cooperative companies in bushehr city. Co-operation and Agriculture, 10(37), 84-109. [In Persian]
  20. Kucharska, W. & Bedford, D.A. (2020). Love your mistakes!—they help you adapt to change. How do knowledge, collaboration and learning cultures foster organizational intelligence?. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 33(7), 1329-1354.
  21. Kumar, N., Mathiyazhagan, K. & Mathivathanan, D. (2020). Modelling the interrelationship between factors for adoption of sustainable lean manufacturing: A business case from the Indian automobile industry. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 13(2), 93-107.
  22. Mahboubi, M.R., Emdadi, A. & Abdullahzadeh, G.H. (2018). Pathology of rural development cooperatives in order to develop entrepreneurial development strategies . Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, 5(1), 61-76. [In Persian]
  23. Malekzadeh, G., Kazemi, M. & Lagzian, M. (2013). Organizational intelligence: Designing a hierarchical model for Iranian public universities using DEMATEL methodology. Transformation Management Journal, 5(10), 94-124. [In Persian]
  24. Malekzadeh, G., Kazemi, M., Lagzian, M. & Mortazavi, S. (2016). Modeling organizational intelligence using DEMATEL method in Iranian public universities. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(1), 134-153.
  25. Najjari, R., Azar, A. & Jalilian, H. (2015). Developing an intelligent organization model in manufacturing companies. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly, 4(1), 24-21. [In Persian]
  26. Najm, N.A. & Alfaqih, A.A. (2021). Organizational intelligence and market expansion in Jordanian pharmaceutical companies. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 12(1), 222-251.
  27. Olfati, J., Rangriz, H., Ahmadi, K. & Rezaei, B. (2021). Designing and explaining the development model of agricultural cooperative companies with the grounded data approach (Case study: Social welfare and cooperative ministry). Co-Operation and Agriculture, 10(37), 143-175. [In Persian]
  28. Samian, M. & Movahed, R. (2018). Obstacles and challenges of enhancing capabilities of rural cooperatives' firms in Hamedan province. Co-operation and Agriculture, 7(25), 147-176. [In Persian]
  29. Soltani, Z., Zareie, B., Rajabiun, L. & Fashami, A.A.M. (2019). The effect of knowledge management, e-learning systems and organizational learning on organizational intelligence. Kybernetes, 49(10), 2455-2474.
  30. Tabarsa, G.A., Rezaeian, A. & Nazarpoori, A.H. (2012). Designing and describing the model of competitive advantage based on organizational intelligence in knowledge-based organizations. New Marketing Research Journal, 2(1), 47-72. [In Persian]
  31. Taghdisi, A., Jamshidi, A. & Najafi, M. (2016). The examine facrors affecting entreneurship development in rural production cooperatives of Isfahan city. Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 9(2), 61-72. [In Persian]
  32. Tarameshloo, M., Mirdamadi, M. & Lashkarara, F. (2018). The role of rural production cooperatives in agricultural development in Qom province of Iran. Village and Development, 18(2), 111-127. [In Persian]
  33. Tootian Esfahani, S. & Goodarzi, L. (2019). The effect of organizational intelligence dimensions on organizational citizenship behavior among managers of the QAWAMIN bank of Tehran city. Naja Human Resources, 10(55), 83-104. [In Persian]
  34. Vakil Alroaia, Y. & Aminbidokhti, A. (2018). Managers' empowerment dimensions based on resistive economics of manufacturing cooperatives. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 7(26), 29-58. [In Persian].
  35. Yarveisi, R., Nazem, F. & Abolmaali, K. (2018). Identifying the factors affecting organizational intelligence in using basic theory (Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah case study). Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 12, 415-435. [In Persian]
  36. Zaied, A.N.H., Grida, M.O. & Hussein, G.S. (2018). Evaluation of critical success factors for business intelligence systems using fuzzy AHP. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(19), 6406-6422.
 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 326
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 94


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب