اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات286
تعداد نشریات سازمان84
تعداد شماره‌ها3,013
تعداد مقالات33,670
تعداد مشاهده مقاله44,785,758
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله39,611,964
ایمانی, بهرام, علوی, سعیده. (1402). تعیین عملکرد فضایی نقاط روستایی به لحاظ توان توسعه اکوتوریسم (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان اردبیل). سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(3), 184-212. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.358271.1459
بهرام ایمانی; سعیده علوی. "تعیین عملکرد فضایی نقاط روستایی به لحاظ توان توسعه اکوتوریسم (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان اردبیل)". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26, 3, 1402, 184-212. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.358271.1459
ایمانی, بهرام, علوی, سعیده. (1402). 'تعیین عملکرد فضایی نقاط روستایی به لحاظ توان توسعه اکوتوریسم (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان اردبیل)', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(3), pp. 184-212. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.358271.1459
ایمانی, بهرام, علوی, سعیده. تعیین عملکرد فضایی نقاط روستایی به لحاظ توان توسعه اکوتوریسم (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان اردبیل). سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 26(3): 184-212. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.358271.1459

تعیین عملکرد فضایی نقاط روستایی به لحاظ توان توسعه اکوتوریسم (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان اردبیل)

روستا و توسعه
دوره 26، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 103، دی 1402، صفحه 184-212    اصل مقاله (887.17 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30490/rvt.2023.358271.1459
نویسندگان
بهرام ایمانی* 1؛ سعیده علوی2
1دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری و روستایی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
2دانش آموخته دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
چکیده
توسعه اکوتوریسم با ایجاد فرصت­ های شغلی منافع اقتصادی بی ­شماری را به ‌طور مستقیم متوجه مردم بومی می­ سازد. گردشگری روستایی نیز به‌عنوان اقتصاد مکمل روستایی راهکاری مفید در جهت کاهش فقر و مهاجرت­ های روستایی به شهرها و افزایش سطح رفاه مردم روستایی مطرح هست که با توجه به ماهیت اکوتوریسم و همخوانی و سازگاری آن با توسعه پایدار می­ تواند رونق اقتصادی روستا را در پی داشته باشد. در این راستا پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین عملکرد فضایی نقاط روستایی به لحاظ توان توسعه اکوتوریسم در شهرستان اردبیل انجام‌ شده است. پژوهش حاضر با روش توصیفی – تحلیلی، 52 نقطه روستایی از بخش ثمرین، مرکزی و هیر با جمعیت بالای 500 نفر را مورد مطالعه قرار داده است. جهت تعیین عملکرد فضایی روستاها از نه معیار در قالب پنجاه شاخص استفاده‌ شده که با استفاده از مدل ANP وزن­ دهی شده و تحلیل­ ها به کمک مدل گاتمن و تاپسیس انجام ‌شده است. نتایج نشان داد که روستای ثمرین، آرالوی بزرگ و انزاب علیا با میانگین به ترتیب 6/56، 6/44 و 6/22 جز قطب گردشگری شهرستان اردبیل و روستاهای سلطان­ آباد، قزل­ قیه، حکیم قشلاقی با میانگین بالای 5 از پتانسیل بالایی برای تبدیل ‌شدن به قطب گردشگری برخوردار هستند. همچنین 21 روستا دارای عملکرد فضایی کانون گردشگری و 28 روستا دارای عملکرد فضایی نقطه گردشگری هستند. همچنین نتایج مدل تاپسیس نشان داد که روستای ثمرین دارای بهترین عملکرد برای توسعه اکوتوریسم روستایی و روستاهای آرالوی بزرگ، پیراقوم، انزاب علیا در رتبه ­های دوم تا چهارم قرار دارند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عملکرد فضایی؛ اکوتوریسم؛ نقاط روستایی؛ شهرستان اردبیل
عنوان مقاله [English]
Determining the Spatial Performance of Rural Areas in terms of Ecotourism Development Potential (Case Study: Ardabil County)
نویسندگان [English]
B. Imani1؛ S. Alavi2
1Associate Professor of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
2PhD in Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Introduction
The tourism industry is considered as a vital factor for the economy due to job creation and income generation. But tourism, along with positive effects, especially in the economic field, can sometimes have negative effects. Considering the negative effects caused by tourism, the concept of sustainable tourism was born, and among the many approaches for sustainable tourism, ecotourism was proposed as the most compatible type of tourism with the greatest potential. This form of tourism has a deep respect for people, tourist places and objects that are visited, and in it, a special emphasis is placed on protecting natural and cultural resources, involving local people in planning processes and creating prosperity for this. Among the tourism opportunities available in rural areas, the presence of natural attractions, pristine landscapes and suitable weather strengthens the ground for the development of ecotourism in villages more than other aspects of tourism development and as a complementary economy. Rural is a useful solution to reduce poverty and reduce migration from rural to the city and increase the level of welfare of rural people, and it can have an all-round effect on the lives of rural people. Considering the importance of ecotourism in national and regional development and the fact that Ardabil county as the center of Ardabil province is prone to develop ecotourism at the country level, and since it has unique ecotourism features and these features and advantages can be considered the basis of sustainable rural development of the city if planned, according to the importance of this part of tourism, the present research was conducted with the aim of determining the spatial performance of rural areas in terms of the ability to develop ecotourism in Ardabil county.
Materials and Methods
In terms of purpose and nature, the current research is of applied type and analytical and descriptive methods respectively. The geographical area under study is 52 rural points with a population of over 500 people from the three districts of Somrin (7 villages), Markazi (34 villages) and Hir (11 villages) in Ardabil county and the sample size is 50 students and professors of tourism to determine the importance of indicators. Quantitative data used in this research was obtained through the information contained in the birth certificates of the settlements published by the Deputy of Rural Development and Underprivileged Regions of the country and was analyzed using Guttman's model.
Results and Discussion
According to the results of Gutman's model, out of 52 studied villages, 3 villages have been evaluated at the tourism pole level, 21 villages at the center level and 28 villages at the tourism point level. In this way, 54 percent of the villages are at the level of tourist spots, and the average of these villages is less than 3.65, and 40 percent of the villages are at the level of tourist centers. As a result, the studied villages have not benefited from the benefits of ecotourism in the same way. Also, the results of the analysis of the poles of ecotourism by different parts of Ardabil county showed that the average of Somrin part is equal to 3.65 and according to this, Somrin village with an average of 6.56 and the highest score as a pole is in the central part of Ardabil county. Anzab Alia village with a score of 6.22 as a tourism hub and Hir section with an average of 3.96 has the best performance among other sections. In this part, Aralavi Bozorg village with the highest average which is equal to 6.44 can become a tourist hub if planned. Also, in the meantime, the village of Qezal Qiyah with a score of 5.33 has a high potential to change the function of the tourism center to a tourism hub.
Conclusions
Since all villages do not have the ability to develop in the field of tourism or this ability is very weak, it is necessary to select the villages that have a higher ability in the field of tourism than other villages with knowledge. According to the results of the village of Somrin, Anzab Alia and Aralvi Bozorg were chosen as the tourist hub of Ardabil county. Villages that have the function of tourism poles are the first priority for investment in the development of ecotourism. Tourism centers are those villages that, if strengthened, have the ability to become tourism hubs. There are 21 rural spots in Ardabil county. The tourism spot is considered as the third priority in the discussion of ecotourism development. Out of the 52 studied villages, 28 villages have the spatial function of a rural spot, which needs to be strengthened during a long-term planning. Also, among the three districts of Ardabil county, in terms of average, Hir district is in the first priority with an average of 3.96, Somrin district is in the second priority with an average of 3.65, and Central district is in the third priority with an average of 3.51.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Spatial Performance, Ecotourism, Rural Areas, Ardabil County
مراجع
  1. Arsić, S., Nikolić, D. & Živković, Z. (2017). Hybrid SWOT - ANP - FANP model for prioritization strategies of sustainable development of ecotourism in National Park Djerdap, Serbia.Forest Policy and Economics, 80, 11–26.
  2. Balkaran, R. & Maharaj, S. (2014). A comparative analysis of the South African and
    global tourism competitiveness models with the aim of enhancing a sustainable model for South Africa. Journal of Economic and Behavioral Studies, 6(4) , 273–278.
  3. Blancas, F.J., Lozano-Oyola, M. & González, M. (2015). A European sustainable tourism labels proposal using a composite indicator. Environonmental Impact Assessment Review, 54, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.05.001
  4. Blangy, S. & Wood, M.E. (1993). Developing and implementing ecotourism guidelines for wildlands and neighboring communities, North Bennington:  Ecotourism Society.
  5. Cobbinah, P.B., Amenuvor, D., Black, R. & Peprah, CH. (2017). Ecotourism in the Kakum conservation area, Ghana: Local politics, practice and outcome. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 20, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2017.09.003
  6. Culture of the Villages of the Vountry
  7. Das, M. & Chatterjee, B. (2015). Ecotourism: A panacea or a predicament? Tourism Management Perspectives, 14, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.01.002
  8. Faraji, A., Nematpour, M. & Ashriya, O. (2016). Systematic analysis of the positive and negative effects of Iran's tourism development with a future-research approach, Social Studies of Tourism, 5(9), 151-189. [In Persian]
  9. Ghanbari, S., Fatahi, A. & Nasiri, K. (2019). Measurement tourists’ satisfaction of the quality of tourism services using the model Kano –SERVQUAL), case study: Papi Villages, KhoramAbad Township, and Province Loorestan. Geographical Planning of Space, 9(33), 115-130. doi: 10.30488/gps.2019.91876. [In Persian]
  10. Ghorbani, R., Zdvali, F. & Zadvali, Sh. (2013). Evaluation of the negative effects of tourism development on tourist-attracting villages (Case example: Kandavan village - Osko city), Regional Planning, 4(15), 103-118. [In Persian]
  11. Habibi, H., Monshizade, R. & Razavian, M.T. (2021). Survey of rural tourism status and its role in rural development with emphasis on entrepreneurship (Case study: The villages of Amlash and Rudsar). Geographical Planning of Space, 11(39), 239-260. doi: 10.30488/gps.2020.200679.3097. [In Persian]
  12. Hajinejhad, A., Aghaei, V. & Hajipour, N. (2019). Evaluation the role of awareness by tourism attractions on ecotourism development (Case study: Awareness assessment of experts and tourists of Ardebil province). Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 16(2), 125-151. [In Persian]
  13. Hamzah, F. (2017). Analysis of ecotourism areas using TOPSIS model (Case study of Firouzkoh city, Tehran province, Iran), New Attitudes in Human Geography, 10(2), 191-202. [In Persian]
  14. Kamiani, S. & Eskandari, K. (2018). Investigating the relationship between ecotourism and the creation of rural employment opportunities with an emphasis on the role of climate (Case study: Masal city), Geografia, 17(60), 184-201. [In Persian]
  15. Kaseger, Sh. & Hashemi, S.Y. (2014). Investigating the sustainable development management strategy of ecotourism in Tenkabon city, Architecture and Sustainable City, 2(2), 11-22. [In Persian]
  16. Khosrowjerdi, M. & Nouripour, M. (2016). Identification of rural tourism development strategies in Drood Zan region: Integration of strategic planning models and artificial neural network. Planning and Preparation of Space. 21(1), 196-167. [In Persian]
  17. Ma, B., Cai, Z., Zheng, J. & Wen, Y. (2019). Conservation, ecotourism, poverty, and income inequality – A case study of nature reserves in Qinling, China. World Development, 115, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.017
  18. Majidi, H., Safarabadi, A. & Goli, A. (2017). Regional Spatial Planning of Rural Tourism Attractions with an Emphasis on Ecotourism Potentials of Kohgiluyeh-BoyerAhmad Province. Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 8(29), 61-82. [In Persian]
  19. Maleki, M., Sartipi-pour, M., Tahbaz, M. & Maleki, A. (2014). Feasibility of ecotourism development of rural communities of Darrehshahr. Space Economy & Rural Development. 2(6), 74-96. [In Persian]
  20. Mirzaei, A., Fallah, N. & Istelazhi, A. (2018). Pathology of ecotourism in rural tourism sample areas of Kermanshah (Case study: Bistun district), New Attitude in Human Geography, 11(4), 375-388. [In Persian]
  21. Mohammadian Mosammam, H., Sarrafi, M., Tavakoli Nia, J. & Heidari, S. (2016). Typology of the ecotourism development approach and an evaluation from the sustainability view: The case of Mazandaran province, Iran. Tourism Management Perspectives, 18, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.03.004
  22. Mondino, E. & Beery, T. (2019). Ecotourism as a learning tool for sustainable development. The case of Monviso transboundary biosphere reserve, Italy. Journal of Ecotourism, 18(2), 107-121.
  23. Motlagh, E.Y., Hajjarian, M., Zadeh, O.H. & Alijanpour, A. (2020). The difference of expert opinion on the forest-based ecotourism development in developed countries and Iran. Land Use Policy, 94,104–549.
  24. Movahed, A., Kohzadi, S. & Abedinzadeh, F. (2014). Kurdistan province ecotourism development strategies using SWOT and QSPM model, Applied Research of Geographical Sciences, 14(32), 181-204. [In Persian]
  25. Najafi, A.A. & Najafi, K. (2020). Examining the challenges and hindrances in development of tourism in rural areas with an emphasis on hydrotherapy case study: Villages of Larijan district, Amol county. Geographical Planning of Space, 10(37), 245-258. [In Persian]
  26. Navabakhsh, M. & Rafiifar, M. (2010). A brief survey of the effects of tourists on the economic life of the people of Ziarat village, Environment Preparation, 3(9), 115-132. [In Persian]
  27. Nazmfar, N., Eshghei, A., Alavi, S. & Pourmoradian, S. (2019). Analysis of travel and tourism competitiveness index in Middle-East countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(6), 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2019.1590428
  28. Niksirat, M., Baghiani, H. & Ghadiri Masoum, M. (2015). Ecotourism effects on sustainable development of desert rural areas set in rural villages Dhbala Shirkooh, Yazd province. Geography and Environmental Planning, 26(3), 131-148. [In Persian]
  29. Ocampo, L., Ebisa, J.A., Jefferson Ombe, J. & Escoto, M.G. (2018). Sustainable ecotourism indicators with fuzzy Delphi method – A Philippine perspective. Ecological Indicators, 93, 874-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.060
  30. Pasape, L., Anderson, W. & Lindi, G. (2015). Good governance strategies for sustainable ecotourism in Tanzania, Journal of Ecotourism, 14(2-3), 145-165.
  31. Rafiee, M., Majidi, A. (2021). Feasibility study of rural ecotourism (Case study: Qaleh Qafeh Pa'in village in Minoodasht). Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas, 2(1), 59-75. [In Persian]
  32. Rezvani, M., Nickravesh, F. & Darban Astaneh, A. (2021). Assessing the ecotourism development capability in rural areas with an emphasis on local risk-taking in decision-making: The case study of Mazandaran province. Town and Country Planning, 13(2), 587-618. [In Persian]
  33. Rivera, J.P.R. & Gutierrez, E.L.M. (2019). A framework toward sustainable ecotourism value chain in the Philippines. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism, 20(2), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2018.1492495
  34. Sadeghi, M. & Ghaedamini Harouni, A. (2020). Identifying the negative cultural effects of tourism on the host community (Case study: Deh Cheshmeh village). Tourism Management Studies, 15(52), 263-308. doi: 10.22054/tms.2021.50908.2291 [In Persian]
  35. Sahneh, B. & Mohajer, E. (2016). Ecotourism development feasibility in mountainous villages of the township of Ali Abad Katoul. Geographical Planning of Space, 6(21), 193-212. [In Persian]
  36. Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). Available at: https://www.amar.org.ir.
  37. Sejasi, H., Sadeghlou, T. & Eftekhari, A. (2015). Assess and prioritize ecotourism entrepreneurship development strategies in rural region (Case study: River valley tourism in Tehran province). Geographical Planning of Space, 5(16), 71-88. [In Persian]
  38. Seydaei, S.E., Moradi, N. & Ghayoor, H. (2013). Investigating and analyzing of ecotourism attractions and potentials in Urmia township using SWOT strategic model. Geographical Researches, 28(1), 107-142. [In Persian]
  39. Shoji, Y. & Tsuge, T. (2015). Heterogeneous preferences for winter nature-based
    tours in sub-frigid climate zones: A latent class approach. Tourism Economics, 21,
    387–407. https://doi.org/10.5367%2Fte.2013.0350
  40. Taghdisi, A., Soltani, Z. & kiyani S. (2014). The role of ecotourism in job opportunities and income. Geographical Researches, 28(4),152-137. [In Persian]
  41. Tavallaei, S., Riyahi, V., Afrakhte, H. & Shabani, A. (2013). Review of capabilities and solutions on rural tourism development in district of Kahak in Qom province. Human Geography Research, 45(4), 103-118. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2013.36138. [In Persian]
  42. UNW (2012). Tourism in the Green Economy: Background Report Madrid, Spain
    and UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya.
  43. Varesi, H., Sarwar, H., Mobaraki, O. & Abdullahzadeh, M. (2011). Feasibility of ecotourism attractions in Ardabil province. Geography and Planning, 16(40), 175-199. [In Persian]
  44. Wang, S.H., Lee, M.T., Château, P.A. & Chang, Y.C. (2016). Performance indicator framework for evaluation of sustainable tourism in the Taiwan coastal zone. Sustainability, 8(7), 1-13.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 208
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 156


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب