اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات283
تعداد نشریات سازمان81
تعداد شماره‌ها2,729
تعداد مقالات31,081
تعداد مشاهده مقاله29,019,350
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله16,333,459
محمدی, محسن, یزدانی, سعید. (1402). یکپارچگی بازار و رهبری جهانی قیمت محصول ذرت. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 31(2), 245-266. doi: 10.30490/aead.2023.358025.1425
محسن محمدی; سعید یزدانی. "یکپارچگی بازار و رهبری جهانی قیمت محصول ذرت". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 31, 2, 1402, 245-266. doi: 10.30490/aead.2023.358025.1425
محمدی, محسن, یزدانی, سعید. (1402). 'یکپارچگی بازار و رهبری جهانی قیمت محصول ذرت', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 31(2), pp. 245-266. doi: 10.30490/aead.2023.358025.1425
محمدی, محسن, یزدانی, سعید. یکپارچگی بازار و رهبری جهانی قیمت محصول ذرت. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 31(2): 245-266. doi: 10.30490/aead.2023.358025.1425

یکپارچگی بازار و رهبری جهانی قیمت محصول ذرت

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه
مقاله 10، دوره 31، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 122، مهر 1402، صفحه 245-266    اصل مقاله (608.96 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30490/aead.2023.358025.1425
نویسندگان
محسن محمدی* 1؛ سعید یزدانی2
1نویسندة مسئول و دانش ‏آموختة دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
2استاد گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکدة اقتصاد و توسعة کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
چکیده
ایران، همه‌‏ساله، مقدار زیادی از ذرت مورد نیاز خود را از طریق واردات تأمین می‌کند؛ و بر اثر همین موضوع، در کنار روند افزایشی وابستگی به ذرت، ایران به یکی از کشورهای واردکننده عمده ذرت در جهان تبدیل شده است. در مطالعة حاضر، با ارزیابی رفتار قیمتی ذرت در بازار کشورهای عمده تولیدکننده شامل برزیل، اوکراین، روسیه، هند، ایالات متحده آمریکا و آرژانتین، فرضیه یکپارچگی بازار ذرت بررسی شد و قانون قیمت واحد مورد آزمون قرار گرفت. داده‌های مورد استفاده به‏ صورت ماهانه و از مهر 1383 تا دی 1400 صورت گرفت. طبق نتایج به‏ دست‏‌آمده، مشخص شد که تجارت جهانی ذرت در یک بازار کاملاً یکپارچه شکل می‏‌گیرد و داده‌های هر بازار مانند علائم نوسان قیمت به یکدیگر منتقل می‌‏شود؛ همچنین، بازار جهانی ذرت از قانون قیمت واحد پیروی کرده و کالای هر بازار یک جانشین کامل برای بازار دیگر بوده است. افزون بر این، با آزمون رهبری قیمت، مشخص شد که ایالات متحده آمریکا، به ‏دلیل تولید و عرضه بالای ذرت، دارای نقش رهبری قیمت در بازار است و دیگر تولید‌کنندگان قیمت محصول خود را بر اساس قیمت کشف‏شده در بازار آمریکا تنظیم می‌کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بازار جهانی؛ ذرت؛ رهبری قیمت؛ یکپارچگی بازار
عنوان مقاله [English]
Market Integration and Global Leadership in Corn Prices
نویسندگان [English]
Mohsen Mohammadi1؛ saeed yazdani2
1Corresponding Author and PhD Graduate in Agricultural Economics, Payam-e Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran
2Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Introduction: As one of the most important grains in the diet of humans and animals, corn is at the center of global food security all over the world, and as one of the most basic crops, it plays a strategic and important role in the food industry, livestock and poultry nutrition. Every year, Iran supplies a large amount of corn through imports, and this issue, along with the increasing trend of dependence on corn, has made the country as one of the major importers of corn in the world. Considering the importance and position of corn in supplying Iran's food chain as well as the country 's high dependence on corn imports from other countries and to maintaining the supply chain, given the influence of different corn markets on each other both in global and domestic dimensions, it is necessary to study the global corn market and the producers who are in charge of leading this market in order to plan the economic and sustainable import of corn needed by the country.
Materials and Methods: In this paper, by studying the price behavior of corn in the market of corn producing countries in the world, including Brazil, Ukraine, Russia, India, USA and Argentina, the hypothesis of corn market integration and the Law of One Price (LOP) were tested. The data used were monthly and from September 2004 to December 2021. In this research, the definition of price leadership proposed by Seaton and Waterson (2013) was used. According to this definition, a market leader first announces a price change and other suppliers accept and follow it. This definition is specially applied to the analysis of time series data and it allows applying cointegration techniques for non-stationary time series data.
Results and Discussion: The study results showed that the global corn trade was formed in a fully integrated market and the data of each market like price fluctuation signals were transmitted to each other; in addition, the global corn market would follow the LOP and the goods of each market were perfect would substitute for each other. The price leadership test also showed that the United States had a leading role in the market due to the high production and supply of corn, and other producers adjusted the price of their product based on the price discovered in the US market.
Conclusions: Since the supply of strategic goods of Iran is mainly the responsibility of the government, Identifying the supply and pricing of corn in the world market can help policymakers in planning corn imports. Considering the tension between Russia and Ukraine as the two largest producing countries and exporters of corn in the world as well as the tense relationship between Iran and the United States of America, it is very important to know the performance of other competitive countries in the market and the possibility of replacing them in supplying the corn needed by Iran. Usually, third countries take advantage of these conditions in the form of an intermediary market, they tend to buy corn at the world price and sell it to the client countries at their desired price. The intensity of price transmission between markets may affect the response speed of food supply traders. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an efficient marketing system in the supply and distribution of corn required by the domestic sector among consumers. According to the approved hypothesis of the corn LOP, the goods of this market are completely substitutes for each other. Therefore, in case of discovering the impact of corn price of the countries trading with Iran on price shocks from the US, it is possible to import the country's required corn at the right time and at the right price. It is also suggested that by making investments in increasing corn production in the country along with the dialogue between regional markets, especially India as one of the largest producers of corn and Iran's trading partner, which the cost of transporting the cargo purchased from it as an important and effective factor in the price is much lower than other exporters, there may be reduced the negative effects of market shocks when the price or corn supply shocks occur.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Global Market, Corn, Market Integration, Price Leadership
مراجع
  • Anderson, C.L., Lipper, L., Dalton, T.J., Smale, M., Hellin, J., Hodgkin, T., ... and Winters, P. (2010). Project methodology: using markets to promote the sustainable utilization of crop genetic resources. In: L. Lipper, C.L. Anderson and T.J. Dalton (Eds) Seed Trade in rural markets: implications for crop diversity and agricultural development, pp. 31-50, Earthdcsn, London.
  • Arnade, C. and Hoffman, L. (2016). Maize price relationships in a changing international market: Have Brazil and/or Ukraine crossed a threshold?2017 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 6-8, 2017, Chicago, Illinois 250116, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.250116.
  • Asche, F., Jaffry, S. and Hartmann, J. (2007). Price transmission and market integration: vertical and horizontal price linkages for salmon. Applied Economics, 39(19): 2535-2545.
  • Asche, F., GjØberg, O. and Guttormsen, A. (2012). Testing the central market hypothesis: a multivariate analysis of Tanzanian sorghum markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 43: 115-123.
  • Bellon, M. (2010). The effects of market integration on the nutritional contributions of traditional foods to the well-being of the rural poor in Africa. Project Concept Note, Bioversity International, Italy.
  • Bougari, I., Asoodar, M.A., Marzban, A. and Kazemi, N. (2020). Investigating water use efficiency, energy productivity, economic and yield under different wheat-maize cropping systems in the northern Khuzestan province. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 30(4): 295-310. (Persian)
  • Cassel, (1918). Abnormal deviations in international exchanges. The Economic Journal, 28(112): 413-415.
  • Ceballos, F., Hernandez, M.A., Minot, N. and Robles, M. (2017). Grain price and volatility transmission from international to domestic markets in developing countries. World Development, 94: 305-320.
  • Chogan, R. (2011). Maize and its characteristics. Karaj: Publication of Agricultural Education. (Persian)
  • Conforti, P. (2004). Price transmission in selected agricultural markets. FAO Commodity and Trade Policy Research Working Ppaper, 7. The Commodities and Trade Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
  • Cournot, A.(1971). Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth. New York: A.M. Kelley.
  • Davenport, F., Steigerwald, D. and Sweeney, S. (2016). Open trade, price supports, and regional price behavior in Mexican maize markets. Economic Geography, 92(2): 201-225.
  • d’Amour, C.B., Wenz, L., Kalkuhl, M., Steckel, J.C. and Creutzig, F. (2016). Teleconnected food supply shocks. Environmental Research Letters, 11(3): 035007.
  • Delgado, C.L. (1986). A variance components approach to food grain market integration in northern Nigeria. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(4): 970-979.
  • Doornik,  and Juselius, K.(2018). Cointegration analysis of time series using CATS 3 for OxMetrics. London: Timberlake Consultants Ltd.
  • Fekari, B., Shahnoushi, N., Mohammadi, H., Mirzapour, A. and Dourandish, A. (2013). Analyzing factors affecting corn price in mercantile exchange market of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 4(16): 155-172. (Persian)
  • Fathi, F. and Ghorbanian, E. (2021). Risk management of Iran’s corn import. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 35(2): 179-191. (Persian)
  • Feenstra, R.C. and Taylor, A.M. (2011). International macroeconomics. Macmillan.
  • Georgieva, K., Mihov, M. and Ivanova, N. (2017). Mechanised technology for growing and harvesting corn. Mechanization in Agriculture and Conserving of the Resources, 63(6): 228-231.
  • Hylleberg, S., Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W. and Yoo, B.S. (1990). Seasonal integration and cointegration. Journal of Econometrics, 44(1-2): 215-238.
  • Honfoga, B.G., N’tandou-Bonzitou, G., Vodouhè, R.S., Bellon, M.R. and Hounhouigan, J.D. (2018). Assessing the role of market integration in the consumption of traditional foods in Benin: a joint price instability coefficient and diet composition approach. Agricultural and Food Economics, 6(1): 1-18.
  • IndexMundi (2022). World corn production. Retrieved at 1 February, 2022. Available at https://www.indexmundi.com/agriculture.
  • IRICA (2022). Annual statistics of the Islamic Republic of Iran Customs Administration. Tehran: Islamic Republic of Iran Customs Administration (IRICA). Available at https://www.irica.ir. (Persian)
  • Marshall, (1947). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
  • Nessabian, S., Ghoreyshi Abhari, S.J., Farahavar, F. and Damankeshideh, M.. (2011). The study of maize production comparative advantage in Iran. Economic Modelling, 5(13): 109-124. (Persian)
  • Pierre, G. and Kaminski, J. (2019). Cross country maize market linkages in Africa: integration and price transmission across local and global markets. Agricultural Economics, 50(1): 79-90.
  • Puma, M.J., Bose, S., Chon, S.Y. and Cook, B.I. (2015). Assessing the evolving fragility of the global food system. Environmental Research Letters, 10(2): 024007.
  • Rani, R., Singh, R., Tewari, H., Singh, S.K. and Singh, P.K. (2017). Integration of major Indian maize markets: a cointegration analysis. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. 13(2): 601-606.
  • Ravallion, M. (1986). Testing market integration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1): 102-109.
  • Sadoulet, E. and de Janvry, A. (1995). Quantitative development policy analysis. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Salazar, L. and Dresdner, J. (2021). Market integration and price leadership: the US Atlantic salmon market. Aquaculture Economics and Management, 25(3): 245-259.
  • Seaton, S. and Waterson, M.(2013). Identifying and characterizing price leadership in British supermarkets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(5): 392-403.
  • Shahbandeh, M. (2022). Corn production worldwide 2014/15-2022/23. Retrieved at 1 February, 2022. Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/1156213/global-corn-production.
  • Srikanth, B., Deshmukh, K.V. and More, S.S. (2019). Market integration of major maize markets in Telangana State. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(12): 1583-1591.
  • Stigler, (1969). The theory of price. London: Macmillan.
  • Taheri, F., Moghaddasi, R. and Mousavi, S.N. (2010). Market structure and price transfer in the global corn market. Agricultural Economics (Economics and Agriculture), 4(3): 185-209. (Persian)
  • Taheri, F. and Mousavi, S.N. (2010). Welfare effects of maize world price change. Refahj. 10(36): 289-312. (Persian)
  • USDA (2022). Grain: World markets and trade: Foreign agricultural service, global market analysis. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Agriculture (USDA).
  • Wu, F. and Guclu, H. (2013). Global maize trade and food security: implications from a social network model. Risk Analysis, 33(12): 2168-2178.
  • Yami, M., Meyer, F. and Hassan, R. (2017). Testing price leadership in major regional maize markets in Ethiopia: implications for targeted market intervention. Agrekon, 56(2): 97-109.
  • Zelingher, R., Makowski, D. and Brunelle, T. (2021). Assessing the sensitivity of global maize price to regional productions using statistical and machine learning methods. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5: 1-11. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.655206.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 716
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 301


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب