| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,812 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,936 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 40,564,166 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 17,903,250 |
واکنش خصوصیات کمی و کیفی چغندرقند به محلول پاشی متانول در شرایط مختلف رطوبت قابل دسترس | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 39، شماره 1، شهریور 1402، صفحه 25-35 اصل مقاله (448.17 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2024.353612.1264 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهدی صادقی شعاع* 1؛ فرزاد پاک نژاد2 | ||
| 1استادیار مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 2استاد گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد کرج، کرج، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با توجه به محدودیت‌هایی که تنش کم‌آبی بر روی گیاهان ایجاد می‌کند، استفاده از راهکارهایی که باعث کنترل یا کاهش اثرات سوء ناشی از کم‌آبی گردد، می‌تواند مد نظر قرار گیرد. به‌منظور بررسی اثر محلول‌پاشی متانول بر برخی از صفات کمی و کیفی چغندرقند در شرایط مختلف رطوبت قابل دسترس، آزمایش مزرعه‌ای طی دو سال در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرج، ایران، به‌صورت اسپلیت پلات در قالب بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار انجام شد. فاکتور اول، میزان آبیاری در دو سطح (S1: نرمال (آبیاری بعد از 40 درصد تخلیه رطوبت قابل دسترس) و S2: تنش (آبیاری بعد از 70 درصد تخلیه رطوبت قابل دسترس) و فاکتور دوم، غلظت‌های مختلف متانول با سه سطح (شاهد)، 14 و 28 درصد حجمی متانول بودند که فاکتور اول در پلات اصلی و فاکتور دوم در پلات فرعی قرار گرفتند. صفات مورد بررسی شامل عملکرد ریشه، عیار قند، سدیم، پتاسیم، نیتروژن، آلکالیته، درصد قند قابل استحصال(، قند ملاس، عملکرد شکر و عملکرد شکر سفید بود. نتایج نشان داد که متانول بدون در نظر گرفتن مقدار رطوبت قابل دسترس می‌تواند باعث افزایش میزان عملکرد ریشه، عملکرد شکر و عملکرد شکر سفید گردد؛ به‌طوری که بیشترین عملکرد ریشه مربوط به سطح 14 و 28 درصد حجمی متانول به ترتیب با 70/12 و 68/78 تن در هکتار بود که این دو از نظر آماری در یک گروه قرار گرفتند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آبیاری؛ چغندرقند؛ خصوصیات کیفی؛ عملکردریشه؛ عملکرد شکرسفید؛ متانول | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The response of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet to foliar application of methanol under drought stress | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mehdi Sadeghi-shoae1؛ farzad paknejad2 | ||
| 1Assistant professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 2professor ofDepartment of Agronomy, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Considering the limitations that drought stress imposes on plants, use of strategies that control or reduce the adverse effects of drought stress is important. In order to evaluate the effect of methanol foliar applicationspraying on some quantitative and qualitative traits of sugar beet under different conditions of available moisture, a field experiment was conducted for two years in the research field of Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Iran, as a split plot in randomized complete blocks with three replications. The first factor was the irrigation at two levels of S1 (normal irrigation after 40% of available moisture drain) and S2 (irrigation after 70% of available moisture drain) and the second factor was different methanol concentrations with three levels (control), 14 and 28% by volume of methanol) in which the first factor was assigned in the main plot and the second factor in the sub-plot. The studied traits included root yield, sugar content, sodium, potassium, nitrogen, alkalinity, white sugar content, molasses sugar, sugar yield, and white sugar yield. Results showed that methanol can increase root yield, sugar yield, and white sugar yield regardless of the amount of available moisture; so that the highest root yield was related to the 14 and 28% volume of methanol with 70.12 and 68.87 t ha-1, respectively, which were statistically placed in the same group. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Irrigation, Methanol, Quality characteristics, Root yield, Sugar beet, White sugar yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadpour R, Armand N, Hosseinzadeh SR, Rejeh M. Evaluation of foliar application of Methanol effects on some morphological, physiological and biochemical indices of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) under water deficit stress. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 2016; 7(2):202-214. doi:10.22067/ijpr.v7i2.47507. [In Persian] Albrecht SL, Douglas CL, Klepper EL, Rasmussn PE, Rickman RW, Smiley RW, Wysocki DW, and Wilkins DE. Effects of foliar methanol application on crop yield. Crop Sci. 1995; 35: 1642-1646. Benson AA, Nonomura AM. The Path of carbon in photosynthesis: Methanol inhibition of glycolic acid accumulation. Photosynthesis Research. 1992; 34:196. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.20.9794. Boyer JS. Plant productivity and environment. Science. 1982; 218:433-448. doi:10.1126/science.218.4571.443. Clover G, Smith H, jaggard K. The crop under stress. British sugar beet review. 1998; 66(3): 17-19. doi:10.22077/escs.2016.213. Cooke D, Scott R. The sugar beet crop Science in to Practice Chapman and Hill, New York. 1993. 195pp. Demmers- Darks H, Mitchel RA, Mitchel VJ, Driscoll SP, Gibbard C, Lawlor DW. Sugar beet under climatic change: photosynthesis and production. Aspects of Applied Biology. 1996; 45:163-170. Devlin MP, Bhowmik C, Karczmarczyk SJ. Influence of methanol on plant germination and growth. Plant Growth Regulation Society of America. 1994; 22:102-108. doi:10.4067/S0718-16202016000100002. Downie A, Miyazaki S, Bohnert H, John P, Coleman J, Parry M, Haslam R. Expression profiling of the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to methanol stimulation. Phytochemistry. 2004; 65: 2305-2316. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.07.006. Earl HJ, Davis RF. Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of Maize. Agronomy Journal. 2003; 95:688-696. doi:10.2134/agronj2003.6880. Ehyaei HR, Parsa M, Kafi M, Nasiri Mahalati M. Effect of foliar application of methanol and irrigation regimes on yield and yield components of chickpea cultivars. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 2010; 1: 37-48. doi:10.22067/ijpr.v1i2.9229. [In Persian] Field TS, Lee DW, Holbrook NM. Why leaves turn red in autumn. The role of anthocyanins in senescing leaves of re-osier dogwood. Plant Physiology. 2001; 127, 566-574. doi:10.1104/pp.900027. Haghighi P, Habibi D, Mozafari H, Sani B, Sadeghi Shoae M. The effect of methanol and glycine amino acid foliar application on yield and some physiological traits of different fodder beet cultivars. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2021;36(2): 185-201. doi:10.22092/jsb.2021.352370.1257 [In Persian] Heins R, 1980. Inhibition of ethylene synthesis and senescence in carnation by ethanol. American Society for Horticultural Science. 1980; 105:141-144. doi:10.1080/01140671.1999.9514082. Hosseinzadeh SR, Amiri H, Ismaili A. Effect of vermicompost fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress. Photosynthetica. 2016; 54(1): 87-92. doi:10.1007/s11099-015-0162-x. Idso SB, Idso KE, Garcia RL, Kimball BA, Hoober JK. Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment and foliar methanol application on net photosynthesis of sour orange tree (Citrus aurantium; Rutaceae) leaves. American Journal of Botany. 1995; 82: 26-30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01430.x. Ivanova, EG, Doronina NV, Shepelyakovskaya AO, Laman AG, Brko FA, Trotsenko YA. Facultative and obligate aerobic methylobacteria synthesize cytokinins. Microbiology. 2000; 69: 646-651. doi:10.1023/A:1013167612105. Ivanova EG, Doronina NV, Trotsenko YA. Aerobic methylobacteria are capable of synthesizing auxins. Microbiology. 2001; 70:392-397. doi:10.1023/A:1010469708107. Lee HS, Choi A, Chung KY, Sa TM. Physiological enhancement of early growth of rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) by production of phytohormone of N2-fixing methylotrophic isolates. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2006; 42: 402-408. doi:10.1007/s00374-006-0083-8. Makhdum MI, Malik MN, Din A, Ahmad SU, Hadhry FC. Physiology response of cotton methanol foliar application. Journal of Research (Science). 2002; 13:37-43. doi:10.4067/S0718-16202016000100002. McGiffen M, Manthey JA. The role of methanol in promoting plant growth: a current evaluation, HortScience. 1996; 31: 1092-1096. Mirakhori M, Paknejad F, Vazan S. Effect of foliar application of methanol on soybean. American Journal of Biochemistery and Biotechnology. 2009; 5(4):162-169. doi:10.22059/ijfcs.2017.239945.654368. [In Persian] Mortensen LM. Effects of foliar sprays of methanol on growth of some greenhouse plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 1995; 64: 187-191. doi:10.1016/0304-4238(95)00841-1. Nadali I, Paknejad F, Moradi F, Vazan S, Tookalo M, JamiAlAhmadi M, Pazoki AR. Effect of foliar application of methanol on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2010; 4(6):398-401. doi:10.22092/jsb.2021.352370.1257. Nonomura AM, Benson AA. The path of carbon in photosynthesis: improved crop yield with methanol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.1992; 89: 9794-9798. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.20.9794. Paknejad F, Mirakhori M, Jami Al-Ahmadi M, Tookalo MR, Pazoki AR, Nazeri P. Physiological response of soybean (Glycine max) to foliar application of methanol under different soil moistures. American Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science. 2009; 9-(4):311-318. doi:10.3844/ajabssp.2009.311.318. Paknejad F, Noormohamadi G, Jamiol ahmad M, Vazan S. Effect of drought stress on yield and water use efficiency in wheat cultivars.the first international conference on the theory and practices in biological water saving (ICTPB).2007; 5(2)24-37. [In Persian] Payne JH. Sugar cane factory analytical control. The official method of Hawaiian sugar technologists. 5th revised ed; produced by the Factory Methods Committee of the Hawaiian Sugar Thechnologists (Elsivier Publications). 1968. 63p. Rahbarian R, Khavari-Nejad R, Ganjeali A, Bagheri A, Najafi F, Roshanfekr M. Use of biochemical indices and antioxidant enzymes as a screening technique for drought tolerance in Chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2011; 7: 5372-5380. doi:10.5897/AJAR11.846. Rajala A, Karkkainen J, Peltonen J, Peltonen-Sainio P. Foliar application of alcohols failed to enhance growth and yield of C3 crop lnd. Crop Production. 1998; 7:129-137. doi:10.1016/s0926-6690(97)00041-1. Ramberg HA, Bradley JC, Olson JSC, Nishio JN, Markwell J. Osterman JC. The role of methanol in promoting plant growth: An update. Review Plant Biochemistry Biotechnology. 2002; 1:113-126. Sadeghi-Shoae M, Paknejad F, Kashani A, Nooralvandi T, Tookalloo MR. Can foliar application with methanol improve the yield, yield components and physiological performance of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Annals of Biological Research. 2012; 3 (10):4780-4785. doi:10.3390/agronomy11112122. Sadeghi-Shoae M, Paknejad F, Kashani A, Vazan S, Nooralvandi T. Methanol and its Period of Foliar Application on Sugar Beet in Different Available Water. Tropentag, September 19-21, 2012; Gottingen. Safarzade Vishgahi M, Noormohammadi Gh, Majidi A, Rabii B. Effect of methanol on the growth function peanuts. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2008; 1: 102-87. doi:102-87. 10.22067/ijpr.v7i2.47507. [In Persian] Zbiec L, Karczmarczyk S, Koszanski Z. Influence of methanol on some cultivated plants. Folia Univ. Agri. Stetin., Agricultura. 1999; 73: 217-220. Zbiec, L, Karczmarczyk S, Podsiadlo C. Response of some cultivated plants to methanol as compared to supplemental irrigation. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Agronomy. 2003; 6(1): 1-7. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 145 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 41 |
||