| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,821 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,997 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 40,667,451 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 17,974,994 |
تغییرات شوری و سدیمی شدن خاک در شرایط آبیاری قطره‌ای زیرسطحی و آبیاری جویچه‌ای نیشکر | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی سازه های آبیاری و زهکشی | ||
| دوره 24، شماره 93، تیر 1403، صفحه 43-59 اصل مقاله (1.71 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/idser.2024.365371.1577 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| الهام زنگنه یوسف‌آبادی* 1؛ اکبر کریمی2؛ علی شینی دشتگل3؛ عبدعلی ناصری4؛ شعبان زارعی5 | ||
| 1محقق آبیاری و زهکشی، گروه تحقیقات آبیاری و زهکشی، موسسه تحقیقات و آموزش نیشکر خوزستان، اهواز، ایران | ||
| 2محقق گروه تحقیقات به‌زراعی، مؤسسه تحقیقات و آموزش نیشکر خوزستان، اهواز، ایران | ||
| 3گروه تحقیقات آبیاری و زهکشی مؤسسه تحقیقات و آموزش نیشکر خوزستان، اهواز، ایران | ||
| 4استاد گروه آبیاری و زهکشی، دانشکده مهندسی آب و محیط زیست، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران | ||
| 5مؤسسه تحقیقات و آموزش نیشکر خوزستان، اهواز، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| یکی از چالش‌های آبیاری قطره‌ای زیرسطحی در مناطق خشک و نیمه خشک، تجمع املاح در لایه سطحی خاک است. این پژوهش به‌منظور بررسی تغییرات شوری و سدیمی-شدن خاک در دو مزرعه آزمایشی آبیاری قطره‌ای زیرسطحی و آبیاری جویچه‌ای واقع در کشت و صنعت حکیم‌فارابی خوزستان انجام شد. در این تحقیق تغییرات شوری خاک در عمق‌های 30-0، 60-30 و 90-60 سانتی‌متری و تغییرات نسبت جذب سدیم (SAR) در لایه سطحی (30-0 سانتی‌متری) خاک، در طول دوره رشد نیشکر (دو (T1)، چهار (T2)، شش (T3)، هشت (T4)، ده (T5) و دوازده (T6) ماه پس از شروع آبیاری) بررسی شد. نتایج نشان داد هدایت الکتریکی (EC) خاک در عمق‌های 30-0 و 60-30 سانتی-متری، در همه زمان‌های مورد بررسی بجز T1 و T5 (انجام آبیاری سطحی در مزرعه قطره‌ای زیرسطحی)، به‌طور معنی‌داری تحت تأثیر روش آبیاری قرارگرفت. بیش‌ترین اختلاف بین مقدار EC خاک در مزرعه آبیاری قطره‌ای زیرسطحی با مزرعه آبیاری جویچه‌ای، مربوط به زمان‌های نمونه‌برداری T3 و T4 بود.غلظت سدیم محلول و مقدار SAR خاک در عمق 30-0 سانتی‌متری خاک، در همه زمان‌ها به‌جز T5، در مزرعه آبیاری قطره‌ای زیرسطحی، به‌طور معنی‌داری بیش‌تر از مزرعه آبیاری جویچه‌ای و در زمان T5، به‌طور معنی‌داری کم‌تر از آبیاری جویچه‌ای بود. در زمان نمونه‌برداری T5، انجام آبیاری سطحی در مزرعه آبیاری قطره‌ای زیر سطحی، سبب آبشویی املاح لایه سطحی خاک و کاهش SAR خاک شد. بنابراین در کنار استفاده از سیستم آبیاری قطره‌ای زیرسطحی در شرایط مناطق خشک و نیمه خشک خوزستان، نیاز است که امکان آبیاری به‌روش سطحی نیز به‌منظور مدیریت شوری خاک فراهم گردد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| سیستم آبیاری؛ کاتیون های محلول خاک؛ نسبت جذب سدیم (SAR) | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Changes in soil salinity and sodicity under subsurface drip irrigation and furrow irrigation of sugarcane | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Elham Zanganeh-Yusefabadi1؛ Akbar Karimi2؛ Ali Sheini-Dashtegol3؛ Abedali Naseri4؛ Shaban Zarei5 | ||
| 1Researcher of Irrigation and Drainage, Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Khuzestan Sugarcane Research and Training Institute, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| 2Researcher, Department of Agronomy, Khuzestan sugarcane research and training institute, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Khuzestan sugarcane research and training institute, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| 4Professor. Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Faculty of Water and Environment Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| 5Khuzestan sugarcane research and training institute, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction In arid and semi-arid regions, optimal use of water resources and management of soil resources is necessary to achieve sustainable agriculture. Accumulation of solutes in the surface layer of the soil is one of the challenges of subsurface drip irrigation, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. In the drip irrigation system, the distribution and accumulation of soluble soil salts in the surface layer of the soil is more than the deeper layers and it increases with increasing distance from the drippers. Soil salinity in the subsurface drip irrigation method should not be ignored, because in this irrigation method, even in good water quality conditions, some amount of water is transferred to the soil and the salt concentration on the soil surface gradually increases. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor and control the soil salinity in subsurface drip irrigation conditions. This study was carried out in order to investigate the soil salinity and sodicity status under subsurface drip irrigation and furrow irrigation during sugarcane growth period. Methodology This study was carried out in two experimental fields of subsurface drip irrigation (with a drip irrigation depth of 20 cm) and furrow irrigation located in the Khuzestan Hakim-Farabi Agro-Industry. In this study, the changes in soil salinity at the depths of 0-30, 30-60, and 60-90 cm and sodium absorption ratio (SAR) in the surface layer (0-30 cm) were investigated during the growth period of sugarcane (2 (T1), 4 (T2), 6 (T3), 8 (T4), 10 (T5) and 12 (T6) months after the start of irrigation). The average data were compared using the t-test at the 5% probability level. Results and Discussion The results showed that at all sampling times, electrical conductivity (EC), concentration of soluble cations (Na, Ca and Mg) and SAR of the soil in the subsurface drip irrigation field were more than the furrow irrigation field. The results indicated that the soil electrical conductivity (EC) at both the depths of 0-30 and 30-60 cm, in all investigated times except 2 and 10 months after the start of irrigation (surface irrigation in subsurface drip field), was significantly affected by the irrigation method. The results of this research showed that in all sampling times of salinity, the concentration of soluble cations (Na, Ca and Mg) and SAR of the soil in the subsurface drip irrigation field was higher than that in the furrow irrigation field. The greatest difference in the soluble concentration of Na, Ca and Mg in the soil in the two studied fields was related to the T4 (8 months after cultivation). At this sampling time, the average soil soluble concentration of Na, Ca and Mg in the subsurface drip irrigation field was 2.1, 1.95 and 1.93 times their values in the furrow irrigation field, respectively. In all sampling times except T5, the soil SAR at the 0-30 cm depth, in the subsurface drip irrigation field, was significantly higher than in the furrow irrigation field, and in T5 sampling time, it was significantly lower than farrow irrigation. At the T5 sampling time, surface irrigation in the sub-surface drip irrigation field led to leaching of accumulated salts especially Na in the surface layer of the soil and reduced the soil SAR. Conclusions According to the results of this study, it seems that besides using a subsurface drip irrigation systems in arid and semi-arid regions (like Khuzestan Province), it is necessary to provide the possibility of surface irrigation in order to manage soil salinity and sodicity. Moreover, considering that sugarcane is a perennial plant, it is necessary to pay attention to soil solute leaching in order to control salinity in the management of sugarcane fields. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Irrigation system, Soil soluble cations, Sodium absorption ratio (SAR) | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bello, S. K., Alayafi, A. H., Al-Solaimani, S. G.and Abo-Elyousr, K. A. (2021). Mitigating soil salinity stress with gypsum and bio-organic amendments: A review. Agronomy, 11(9), 1735.
Carter, M. R. & Gregorich, E. G. (2008). Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Djajadi, D., Syaputra, R., Hidayati, S. N., & Khairiyah, Y. (2020). Effect of vermicompost and nitrogen on N, K, Na uptakes and growth of sugarcane in saline soil. Agrivita Journal of Agricultural Science, 42(1), 110-119.
Fu, B., Li, Z., Gao, X., Wu, L., Lan, J. & Peng, W. (2021). Effects of subsurface drip irrigation on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) growth and soil microbial community structures in arid and semi-arid areas of northern China. Applied Soil Ecology, 159, 103859.
Ibrahim, M., Mahmoud, E.and Ibrahim, D. (2020). Assessing the impact of water treatment residuals and rice straw compost on soil physical properties and wheat yield in saline sodic Soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 51(18), 2388-2397.
Jiawei, Y. A. O., Yongqing, Q. I., Huaihui, L. I. & Yanjun, S. H. E. N. (2021). Water saving potential and mechanisms of subsurface drip irrigation: A review. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(6): 1076-1084.
Martínez-Gimeno, M. A., Bonet, L., Provenzano, G., Badal, E., Intrigliolo, D. S. & Ballester, C. (2018). Assessment of yield and water productivity of clementine trees under surface and subsurface drip irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 206, 209-216.
Ministry of Agriculture Jihad (1401). Agriculture Statistics, Planning and Economic Deputy, Statistics and Information Office, Isfahan. (In Persian).
Murphy, J., & Riley, J. P. (1962). A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytical Chemical Acta, 27, 31-36.
Palacios-Díaz, M. P., Mendoza-Grimón, V., Fernández-Vera, J. R., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, F., Tejedor-Junco, M. T., & Hernández-Moreno, J. M. (2009). Subsurface drip irrigation and reclaimed water quality effects on phosphorus and salinity distribution and forage production. Agricultural Water Management, 96(11), 1659-1666.
Rafie, R. M. & El-Boraie, F. M., (2017). Effect of drip irrigation system on moisture and salt distribution patterns under north Sinai conditions. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 57(3), 247-260.
Rhoades, J. D. (1996). Salinity: Electerical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In Methods of Soil Analysis (Part 3). Edited by Sparks, D. L. Soil Science Society of America Publishing: Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Shaygan, M. & Baumgartl, T. (2022). Reclamation of salt-affected land: A review. Soil Systems, 6(3), 61.
Sheini-Dashtgol, A., Kermannezhad, J., Ghanbari-Adivi, E., & Hamoodi, M. (2022). Evaluating moisture distribution and salinity dynamics in sugarcane subsurface drip irrigation. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 7(3), 227-245.
Sheini-Dashtgol, A. (2019). Principles of applied water management in sugarcane, Sugarcane Research and Training In Institute, 144p
Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., & Loeppert, R. H. (Eds.). (2020). Methods of soil analysis, part 3: Chemical methods (Vol. 14). John Wiley & Sons.
Taheri, M., Taheri, M., Abbasi, M., Mostafavi, K., & Vahedi, S. (2017). Patterns of soil salinity and sodium under surface and subsurface drip irrigation in olive trees. Irrigation and Water Engineering, 7(2), 127-141. (In Persian).
Thompson, T. L., Roberts, T., Lazarovitch, N., (2010, August). Managing soil surface salinity with subsurface drip irrigation. In 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. Brisbane, Australia
Wang, H., Wang, N., Quan, H., Zhang, F., Fan, J., Feng, H., Cheng, M., Liao, Z., Wang, X. & Xiang, Y. (2022). Yield and water productivity of crops, vegetables and fruits under subsurface drip irrigation: A global meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 269, 107645.
Yang, F., Wu, P., Zhang, L., Liu, Q., Zhou, W., & Liu, X. (2023). Subsurface irrigation with ceramic emitters improves the yield of wolfberry in saline soils by maintaining a stable low-salt environment in root zone. Scientia Horticulturae, 319, 112181.
Zaman, M., Shahid, S. A. & Heng, L. (2018). Irrigation systems and zones of salinity development. In Guideline for salinity assessment, mitigation and adaptation using nuclear and related techniques (pp. 91-111). Springer, Cham.
Zanganeh Yusefabadi, E., Hooshmand, A., Naseri, A., Boroomand-Nasab, S., & Parvizi, M. (2021). The effect of different management of sub-surface irrigation on water productivity, yield and yield component of sugarcane (var. CP69-1062). Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 44(1), 1-15. (In Persian).
Zanganeh-Yusefabadi, E., Naseri, A., Hooshmand, A., & BoroomandNasab, S. (2023). The Effect of installation depth and discharge of dripper on soil salinity distribution in subsurface drip irrigation of sugarcane. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 54(8), 1159-1177. (In Persian).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 96 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 61 |
||