Related Links
Development of a repulsion molecular marker linked to rhizoctonia resistance gene(s) in sugar beet | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| Article 3, Volume 40, Issue 1, February 2025, Pages 13-30 PDF (875.4 K) | ||
| Document Type: Scientific - Research | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/jsb.2024.365710.1360 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Naime Tork1; Mozhdeh Kakueinezhad2; S.B. Mahmoudi3; Mojdeh Maleki4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. student of plant pathology, Varamin – Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj, Iran | ||
| 4Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Rhizoctonia root and crown rot is the most important fungal disease in sugar beet fields in the Iran and the most effective way to manage this disease is to develop resistant varieties. For genotypic screening of improved sugar beet lines, molecular markers linked to resistance genes to rhizoctonia pathogen are needed. In this research, the flanking sequences of a SNP molecular marker identified at the university of Padua, Italy were obtained and at the Sugar Beet Seed Institute, a pair of specific primers were designed and converted into a repulsion STS marker called SR2-r with normal PCR capability. This repulsion marker is able to identify homozygous resistant genotypes in the gene locus related to the marker. To check the reproducibility and confirm the repulsion marker SR2-r, first, several populations and breeding lines of the available germplasm of the Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) were cultivated in microplots or in the greenhouse at different times. Then, the developed roots were inoculated with corn seeds infested to rhizoctonia pathogen. Leaf samples were prepared from the inoculated plants and kept at -70°C until use. After a few weeks of inoculation, single roots were taken from microplots or pots, and the rhizoctonia disease score in each root was recorded and disease index of each genotype calculated and the genotyps classified. In next step, susceptible and resistant plants were selected and DNA was extracted from their frozen leaves. PCR molecular analysis was performed with primers related to the repulsion marker in the DNA of susceptible and resistant plants and the presence and absence of the marker in single plants was determined. In the next step, the relationship between the repulsion molecular marker results and the rhizoctonia disease score was studied in the form of a pairwise comparison in all the tested plants. The results showed 87% agreement between molecular markers and phenotypic resistance in greenhouse or microplot conditions. This repulsion marker was able to identify 48% of rhizoctonia resistant plants. However, due to the unexpected presence of very weak bands in some resistant homozygous genotypes, it is suggested to carry out real-time PCR if possible. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Disease; molecular marker; resistance evaluation; rhizoctonia; sugar beet | ||
| References | ||
|
Buttner G, Pfähler B, Märländer B. Greenhouse and field techniques for testing sugar beet for resistance to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot. Plant Breeding, 2008; 123: 158-166. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523. 2003. 00967.x. Dellaporta S L, Wood J, Hicks JB. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 1983; 1: 19-21. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02712670. Hassani M, Heidari B, Stevanato P, Campagna G, Broccanello C, Norouzi P, Concheri G, Panella L. A candidate single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker linked to resistance to infection with rhizoctonia in sugar beet. 76th IIRB Congress, 2018; 5-7 June. Deauville, France. Herr LJ. Sugar beet diseases incited by Rhizoctonia species. pp. 341-350. In: Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S, Dijst G (Eds.). Rhizoctonia species: Taxonomy, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. Netherlands. 1996. Lein JC, Asbach K, Tian Y, Schulte D, Li C, Koch G, Jung C, Cai DG. Resistance gene analogues are clustered on chromosome 3 of sugar beet and co-segregate with QTL for rhizomania resistance. Genome, 2007; 50: 61–71. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/g06-131. Lein JC, Sagstetter CM, Schulte D, Thurau T, Varrelmann M, Saal B, Koch G, Borchardt DC, Jung C. Mapping of Rhizoctonia root rot resistance genes in sugar beet using pathogen response-related sequences as molecular markers. Plant Breeding, 2008; 127: 602–611. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523. 2008.1525.x. Mahmoudi SB, Mesbah M, Alizadeh A. Pathogenesis variation of rhizoctonia solani isolates of sugar beet. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology. 2004; 40: 253-283. (in Persian). Mahmoudi SB, Soltani J. Sugar beet root rot in Iran. Newsletter of Iranian Sugar Industries Research and Training Center, 2005; 16(178): 14-18. (in Persian). Nazari A. Identification of molecular markers linked to genes controlling rhizoctonia resistance in sugar beet. MSc thesis. Crop science and breeding department. AboureihanPardis. Tehran Univ. 2011.(in Persian). Norouzi P, Rahmani D, Oroojalian S, Mahmoudi B, Aghaeizadeh M, Kakuinejad M, Orazizadeh, MR, Vahedi S, Fathi MR. Confirmation of repulsion molecular markers linked to rhizomania resistance gene (Rz1) and evaluation of gene dose effect in sugar beet genotypes. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2013; 29: 133-145. (in Persian). Norouzi P, Sabzehzari M, Zeinali H. Efficiency of some molecular markers linked to rhizomania resistance gene (Rz1) for marker assisted selection in sugar beet. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 2015; 18 (5): 319-323. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-015-0033-9. Norouzi P, Rajabi A, Fasahat P. Molecular markers in sugar beet. Agricultural education publishing, Tehran. 2022; 275 p. (in Persian). Nouhi AA, Amiri R, Haghnazari A, Saba J, Mesbah M. Use of molecular marker for assay gene dosage resistant gene to rhizomania disease (Rz1) in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Asian Journal of Biotechnology. 2009; 1(1): 37-41. Doi:https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbkr.2009.37.41. Panella, LW, Ruppel, EG. Availibility of germplasm for resistance against Rhizoctonia spp. pp.515-527. In: Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S and Dijst G. (Eds.). Rhizoctonia species: Taxonomy, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. 1996. Rajabi A, Aghaeezadeh M. Sugar beet breeding. Training course in KWS company. Einbeck, Germany, June-July. 2012. (in Persian). Ravi S, Hassani M, Heidari B, Deb S, Orsini E, Li J, Richards C, Panella L, Srinivasan S, Campagna G, Concheri G, Squartini A and Stevanato P. Development of an SNP assay for marker-assisted selection of soil-borne Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2-IIIB resistance in sugar beet. Biology. 2022; 11 (49): 1-17. Doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010049. Scholten OE, Panella LW, De Bock TS, Lange W. A greenhouse test for screening sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) for resistance to Rhizoctonia solani. European journal of plant pathology, 2001; 107: 161-166. Sheikholeslam M. Diagnosis of fungi of sugar beet root rot and determining of their dispersion in Kermanshah province. Final report of project. 2001; 17 p. (in Persian). Windels C, Panella L, Ruppel E, Sugar beet germplasm resistant to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot withstands disease caused by several pathogenic isolates of Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2. Sugar beet. Research and Extension Reports, 1995; 26: 179-185. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 255 PDF Download: 245 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb