| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,035 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,961 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,474,096 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 71,664,275 |
تاثیر بسته‌بندی و مدت زمان نگهداری بر ویژگی های دانة پوست‌گیری شدة کینوا | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی صنایع غذایی | ||
| دوره 23، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 77، آذر 1403، صفحه 129-144 اصل مقاله (581.64 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/fooder.2024.366324.1397 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| بهجت تاج الدین* 1؛ محمود باقری2 | ||
| 1عضو هیئت علمی | ||
| 2عضو هیئت علمی موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر- سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی- کرج- ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| کینوا گیاهی شبه‌غله و منبع مناسبی از موادمعدنی، ویتامین‌ها، ترکیبات پلی‌فنلی، فیتوسترول‌ها و فلاونوئیدها است. قرار گرفتن آن در شرایط نامساعد نگهداری، منجر به افت کیفیت و زیان اقتصادی می‌شود. هدف از این مطالعه، ارزیابی خصوصیات فیزیکوشیمیایی دانة کینوا طی مدت بسته‌بندی و نگهداری آن است. بدین منظور، دانة پوست‌گیری‌شدة ژنوتیپ Q12 کینوا داخل سه نوع ماده بسته‌بندی شامل پارچه، پلاستیک (فیلم پلی‌اتیلن سبک)، و ترکیبی از پارچه و پلاستیک به دو روش معمولی و تحت‌خلاء بسته‌بندی و در دمای حدود oC5 به‌مدت یک سال نگهداری و فراسنجه‌های کمی و کیفی آن‌ها بررسی شد. پس از حدود 4-3 ماه نگهداری، بسته‌های تحت‌خلاء به‌تدریج از حالت خلاء خارج شدند. در میان بسته‌های تحت خلاء، نمونه‌های مربوط به ترکیبی از پارچه و فیلم نسبت به فیلم تنها، یک ماه دیرتر از حالت خلاء خارج شدند. نتایج شاخص‌های اندازه‌گیری شده نشان داد که استفاده از بسته‌بندی تحت‌خلاء به‌طور معنی‌داری در حفظ خصوصیات کمی و کیفی دانة کینوا موثر است (p<0.05). هر دو نوع مواد بسته‌بندی پلی‌اتیلن، و ترکیبی از پلی‌اتیلن و پارچه، در هر دو روش بسته‌بندی معمولی و تحت‌خلاء به‌طور معنی‌داری در حفظ خصوصیات کیفی دانه‌های کینوا نسبت به شاهد (بسته‌بندی معمولی نمونه‌ها داخل پارچه) موثر بودند (p<0.05). معنی‌دار نبودن تمام صفات در بررسی اختلاف آماری تیمارها نشانگر ضرورت بسته‌بندی است که توانسته است اختلاف بین تیمارها را کم کند. در کل از میان همة تیمارها طی یک سال نگهداری، داده‌های نمونه‌های بسته‌بندی تحت خلاء در ترکیبی از پارچه و فیلم به داده‌های روز صفر نزدیکتر بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بسته‌بندی؛ پوست‌گیری؛ زمان نگهداری؛ ژنوتیپ Q12؛ کینوا | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The effect of Packaging and storage time on the characteristics of husking quinoa grain | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Behjat Tajeddin1؛ Mahmood Bagheri2 | ||
| 1Agricultural Engineering Research Institute | ||
| 2Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII)- Agricultural, Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Quinoa is a pseudocereal and a good source of minerals, vitamins, polyphenolic compounds, phytosterols and flavonoids. Unfavorable storage and packaging conditions for quinoa decreases its quality. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics of quinoa during its packaging and storage time. For this purpose, the husking Q12-genotype quinoa were packed inside three type of packaging material including low-density-polyethylene (LDPE), textile, and LDPE + textile and stored at 5OC for one year using normal and vacuum packaging and its quantitative and qualitative parameters were evaluated. After about 3-4 months of storage, the packages under vacuum gradually lost the vacuum state. Among the vacuum packages, the samples of the LDPE + textile lost the vacuum about one month later than the LDPE film. Measured indicators results showed that with the probability of error less than 0.05 (p<0.05), the use of vacuum packaging, was effective in protection of the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of quinoa grains. Both types of packaging material type i.e. polyethylene film and LDPE+textile in both types of normal and vacuum packaging with a confidence level of 95% were effective in the prevention of the quinoa quality, compared to the control (normal packaging of samples inside textile). The non-significance of all treatments shows the necessity of packaging, which has been able to reduce the difference between treatments. Among all the treatments during one year of storage time, the data of samples under vacuum packed in LDPE+textile were closer to the data of zero-day. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Husking, Q12 genotype, Quinoa, Packaging, Storage time. &emsp | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abugoch, L., Romero, N., Tapia, C., Silva, J., & Rivera, M. )2008(. Study of some physicochemical and functional properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) protein isolates. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56: 4745–4750. Ando, H., Chen, Y., Tang, H., Shimizu, M., Watanabe, K., & Miysunaga, T. )2002(. Food components in fractions of quinoa seed. Food Science and Technology Research, 8(1): 80–84. Angeli, V., Silva, P.M., Massuela, D.C., Waleed Khan, M., Hamar, A., Khajehei, F., Graeff-Honninger, S., & Piatti, C. )2020(. Quinoa: an overview of the potentials of the "golden grain" and socio-economic and environmental aspects of its cultivation and marketization. Foods, 9, 216, 31 pages. Ahamed, N.T., Rekha, S., singhal, P.R.K., & mohinder, P. )1998). A lesser-known grain, Chenopodium quinoa: review of the chemical composition of its edible parts. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 19: 61–70. Anon. (2005). Method 923.03. In: Official methods of analysis, 18th Edition, AOAC International Publisher, Gaithersburg. Anon. (2009). Soxhlet extraction method. EPA 3540C, Administrative Record, O-SOXHLET-Rev7, pages 19196-19206. Anon. (2021). Quinoa seed hulling machine. http://www.grain-processing.org/PRODUCTS/Single-Machine-for-Grain-Processing/quinoa-hulling-machine.html Anon, (2024). Box compression tester: ensuring optimal packaging quality and durability. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/box-compression-tester-ensuring-optimal-packaging-pacorr-izgbc?trk=public_post_main-feed-card_feed-article-content Atef, A.A., El-Faham, S.Y., & Wafaa, H.E. (2014). Use of quinoa meal to produce bakery products to celiac and autism stuffs. International Journal of Science and Research. 3 (9): 1344-1354. Bagheri, M. (2020). Evaluation of compatibility and stability of selected quinoa genotypes in autumn cultivation areas. The final report of the research project No. 58407 dated 1399/8/5. Ministry of Jihad Agriculture, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization, Seed and Plant Breeding Research Institute. (in Persian) Bakhtavar, M.A., & Afzal, I. (2020). Climate smart dry chain technology for safe storage of quinoa seeds. Scientific Reports, 10: 12554. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69190-w. Bock, P.D., Gerda Cnops, G., Muylle, H., Quataert, P., Eeckhout, M., & Bockstaele, F.V. (2022). Physicochemical characterization of thirteen quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) varieties grown in North-west Europe-Part II. Plants, 11(3): 265. Brady, K., Ho, C-T., Rosen, R.T., Sanga, S., & Karwe, M.V. (2007). Effects of processing on the nutraceutical profile of quinoa. Food Chemistry, 100 (3): 1209–1216. Dallagnol, A.M., Pescuma, M., De Valdez, G.F., & Rollán, G. (2013). Fermentation of quinoa and wheat slurries by Lactobacillus plantarum CRL 778: proteolytic activity. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97: 3129-3140. D’ambrosio, T., Amodio, M.L., Pastore, D., De Santis, G., & Colelli, G. (2017). Chemical, physical and sensorial characterization of fresh quinoa sprouts (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and effects of modified atmosphere packaging on quality during cold storage. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 14, Part A, 52-58. Egan, H., Kirk. R.S., & Sawyer, R. (2020). Pearson’s chemical analysis of foods. 8th Edition. Published by Churchill Livingston. Filho, A.M.M., Pirozi, M.R., Borges, J.T.S., Sant'Ana, H.M.P., Chaves, J.B.P., & Coimbra, J.S.D.R. (2017). Quinoa: Nutritional, functional and antinutritional aspects. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(8): 1618-1630. Hassoon, W.H., & Dziki, D. (2018). The effect of seed moisture and temperature on grinding characteristics of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). BIO Web of Conferences, 10, 01006. Hirich, A., Rafik, S., Rahmani, M., Fetouab, A., Azaykou, F., Filali, K., Ahmadzai, H., Jnaoui, Y., Soulaimani, A., Moussafir, M., Gharous, M.E., Karboune, S., Sbai, A., & Chukr-Allah, R. (2021). Development of quinoa value chain to improve food and nutritional security in rural communities in Rehamna, Morocco: lessons learned and perspectives. Plants, 10: 301, 26 pages. Jyoti, M.R., & Sarojani, JK. (2018). Evaluation of millet composite flour. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 7(7): 946-949. Kiarsi, Z., Hojjati, M., Alizadeh Behbahani, B., Noshad, M. (2020). In vitro antimicrobial effects of Myristica fragrans essential oil on foodborne pathogens and its influence on beef quality during refrigerated storage. Journal of Food Safety, 40(3): 1-14. Kibar, H., Sönmez, F., & Temel, S. (2021). Effect of storage conditions on nutritional quality and color characteristics of quinoa varieties. Journal of Stored Products Research, 91: pp. 101761. Koziol, M. (1992). Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 5: 35–68. Miranda, M., Vega-Gálvez, A., López, J., Parada, G., Sanders, M., Aranda, M., Uribe, E., & Di Scala, K. (2010). Impact of air-drying temperature on nutritional properties, total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Industrial Crops and Products, 32 (3): 258-263. Oshodi, A., Ogungbenle, H., & Oladimeji, M. (1999). Chemical composition, nutritionally valuable minerals and functional properties of benniseed, pearl millet and quinoa flours. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 50, 325–331. Padmashree, A., Negi, N., Haridas, S., Govindaraj, T., Raghavan, K., Kumar, A., Semwal, A.D., & Sharma, G.K. (2018). Development and Quality Evaluation of Choco Quinoa Nutri Bar during Storage. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 9 (7), 899-914. Quiroga Ledezma, C.C., Escalera, R., Aroni, G., Bonifacio, A., Gonzalez, J.A., Vilica, M., Saravia, R., & Riiz, A. (2015). Traditional processes and technological innovations in quinoa harvesting, processing and industrialization, in book: State of the art report on quinoa around the world in 2013, Editors: D. Bazile, D. Bertero, C. Nieto. Publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) & Centre de Coopération International en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD). Ranhotra, G.S., Gelroth, J.A., Glaser, B.K., Lorenz, K.J., & Johnson, D.L. (1993). Composition and protein nutritional quality of quinoa. Cereal Chemistry, 70: 303–305. Repo-Carrasco-Valencia, R.A-M., & Serna, L.A. (2011). Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa, Willd.) as a source of dietary fiber and other functional components. Food Science and Technology (Campinas), 31(1): 225-230. Saricaoglua, F.T., & Turhan, S. (2019). Performance of mechanically deboned chicken meat protein coatings containing thyme or clove essential oil for storage quality improvement of beef sucuks. Meat Science, 158, 1-8. Wang, S., & Zhu, F. (2016). Formulation and quality attributes of quinoa food products. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 9 (1): 49–68. Wu, L.G., Wang, A., Shen, R., & Qu, L. (2020). The effect of slight milling on nutritional composition and morphology of quinoa (Chenopodium) grain. International Journal of Food Engineering, 16 (11): 20190371. DOI: 10.1515/ijfe-2019-0371 Youdim, K., Martin, A., & Joseph, J. (2000). Essential fatty acids and the brain: Possible health implications. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 18(4–5): 383–399. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 123 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 97 |
||