| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,110 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,666 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 49,821,980 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 80,169,091 |
گزینش اولیه ژنوتیپهای دیرگل به (.Cydonia oblonga Mill) برای مناطق مرتفع با استفاده از خصوصیات رشدی و باردهی | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| دوره 40، شماره 4، دی 1403، صفحه 550-527 اصل مقاله (812.75 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/spj.2025.371205.1451 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مریم تاتاری* 1؛ حمید عبدالهی2 | ||
| 1دانشیار، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی اصفهان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اصفهان، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، پژوهشکده میوههای معتدله وسردسیری، موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این پژوهش به منظور گزینش اولیه 13 ژنوتیپ دیرگل انتخابی از کلکسیون ملی درخت به و ارزیابی خصوصیات رویشی و باردهی این ژنوتیپها در ایستگاه تحقیقات باغبانی سمیرم استان اصفهان، به عنوان منطقه مرتفع برای کشت این درخت، انجام شد. در این پژوهش ژنوتیپهای AS1، ASM1، ASM2، ASM3، ASP1، ASP2 (ژنوتیپهای گیلان)، گیوی کوثر، سیبی کوثر، اردبیل 1، اردبیل 2، اردبیل 3، اردبیل 4 و اردبیل 6 (ژنوتیپهای اردبیل) مورد ارزیابی و مقایسه قرار گرفتند.آزمایش در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با شش تکرار در سالهای 1402 و 1403 اجرا شد. ژنوتیپهای اردبیل 3 و اردبیل 4، بیشترین رشد رویشی را نشان دادند. نتایج نشان داد که بیشترین قطر پایه (103/96میلیمتر) و قطر رقم (100/5میلیمتر) متعلق به ژنوتیپ اردبیل 3 و پس از آن بیشترین قطر محل پیوند (101/006میلیمتر) و ارتفاع درخت (260 سانتیمتر) مربوط به ژنوتیپ اردبیل 4 بود. در حالیکه کمترین عملکرد میوه در درخت و کارایی عملکرد میوه مربوط به این دو ژنوتیپ بود. بیشترین و کمترین وزن میوه به ترتیب برای ژنوتیپهای اردبیل 1 (326/22گرم) و ASM2 (93/78گرم) ثبت شد. عملکرد میوه بیشتر در ژنوتیپهای گیلان دیده شد، به طوری که ژنوتیپ ASM3 بیشترین تعداد میوه در درخت (116/33میوه) و ژنوتیپ ASP2 بیشترین عملکرد میوه (16/63کیلوگرم در درخت) و کارایی عملکرد میوه (0/603کیلوگرم بر سانتیمتر مربع) را داشتند. بیشترین TSS در ژنوتیپ اردبیل 2 اندازه گیری شد. این ژنوتیپ به همراه ژنوتیپ اردبیل 3، سفتترین بافت میوه را داشتند. ژنوتیپهای گیلان در منطقه مرتفع سمیرم عملکرد مطلوبتری نسبت به ژنوتیپهای اردبیل داشتند. ژنوتیپهای ASP2 و سپس ASM1 از نظر عملکرد میوه و ویژگی های کیفیت میوه از سایر ژنوتیپها برتر بودند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| به؛ وزن میوه؛ عملکرد میوه در درخت؛ کارایی عملکرد میوه؛ مواد جامد محلول کل | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Preliminary Selection of Late Flowering Quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) Genotypes for High Elevation Regions Using Growth and Fruiting Characteristics | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| M. Tatari1؛ H. Abdollahi2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Field and Horticulture Crops Sciences Research Department, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension organization, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| 2. Associate Professor, Temperate Fruits Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In this research, growth and fruit characteristics of 13 quince genotypes; AS1, ASM1, ASM2, ASM3, ASP1, ASP2 (Guilan genotypes), Givi Kosar, Sibi Kosar, Ardebil 1, Ardebil 2, Ardebil 3, Ardebil 4 and Ardebil 6 (Ardebil genotypes), grafted on hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) in 2017, were evaluated and compared. The experiment was carried-out in randomized complete block design with six replications in Samirom horticultural research station in 2023 and 2024. The results revealed that Ardebil 3 and Ardebil 4 genotypes had the highest vegetative growth. However, the lowest fruit yield tree-1 and yield efficiency were associated with these two genotypes. ASM3 genotype showed the highest number of fruits tree-1 and the ASP2 genotype showed the highest fruit yield tree-1 and yield efficiency. The highest TSS was measured in the Ardebil 2 genotype. This genotype, along with Ardebil 3 genotype, had the firmest fruit tissue. Guilan quince genotypes showed higher yield tree-1 than Ardebil genotypes in the highland region of Semirom. ASP2 and then ASM1 quince genotypes had higher fruit yield tree-1 and more desirable quality properties than other genotypes. Keywords: Quince, fruit weight, fruit yield tree-1, fruit yield efficiency, total soluble solids Introduction Establishment of quince orchards using suitable genotypes with high fruit yield and quality is a profitable investment. Large fruits of quince allow for easy harvesting in a short period of time. Quince is usually used for producing juice, jam, conserve, and jelly. In addition, quince fruits are easily transported, have long shelf life, and retain their unique aroma and flavor for long time (Paunovic et al., 2025). Paunovic et al. (2025) reported that fruit weight of quince varied from 252.7 grams in cv. Hemus to 289.5 grams in cv. Leskovacka. Imrak (2025) reported that among the studied cultivars, cv. Ekmek showed the highest fruit weight and cv. Tekec showed significantly lower fruit weight. Cv. Acem had the highest TSS content with an average of 20.20%. Radovic et al., 2016 showed that although cv. Leskovacka had the lowest fruit yield tree-1 due to its low growth vigor, but it had higher yield efficiency than most of the studied cultivars. Quince cultivation has been developed in various regions of Iran, such as the highland region of Semirom in Isfahan province. Therefore, selection of suitable and adapted quince cultivars for highland regions is necessary. In this research, quince genotypes collected from low and high altitude regions were evaluated and compared in Semirom horticultural research station, Isfahan province. Materials and Methods Growth and fruit characteristics of 13 quince genotypes; AS1, ASM1, ASM2, ASM3, ASP1, ASP2 (Guilan genotypes), Givi Kosar, Sibi Kosar, Ardebil 1, Ardebil 2, Ardebil 3, Ardebil 4 and Ardebil 6 (Ardebil genotypes), grafted on hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) in September 2017, were evaluated and compared. The experiment was carried-out in randomized complete block design with six replications in Samirom horticultural research station in 2023 and 2024. In 2023 and 2024, the vegetative and reproductive characteristics of genotypes were evaluated, measured and recorded. The studied characteristics included rootstock diameter, grafting site diameter, cultivar diameter, tree height, crown diameter, shoot diameter, current shoot length, internode length, trunk cross sectional area (TCSA), leaf length and width, leaf number, length, width and shape, and fruit weight, total soluble solids (TSS), fruit tissue firmness, fruit yield tree-1 and fruit yield efficiency. Three trees were selected in each genotype and four branches on four geographical directions of each tree were chosen to evaluate vegetative characteristics. For fruit traits, 10 fruits from three selected trees of each genotype were harvested of and transported to the laboratory. Combined analyses of variance was performed using SAS version 9.2 software. Means were compared using the LSD test at the 5% probability level. Results and discussion Ardebil 3 genotype showed the highest rootstock diameter and cultivar diameter with averages of 103.96 and 100.5 mm, respectively. Ardebil 2 genotype had the lowest average grafting site diameter and cultivar diameter. Ozturk et al. (2022) reported the longest rootstock diameter (62.63 mm) in cv. Limon, and the longest cultivar diameter (50.49 mm) in cv. Gordes. The tallest and shortest trees belonged to the Ardebil 4 and Sibi Kosar genotypes with averages of 260 and 181 cm, respectively. Sibi Kosar genotype in 2024 showed the highest trunk cross-sectional area with an average of 87.39 cm2. The average fruit weight was 159.53 grams and was 158.57 grams in 2023 and 2024, respectively. The reported range for fruit weight in this study was greater than those reported by Tatari and Abdollahi (2021). In both years, Ardebil 2 and Ardebil 3 genotypes showed the highest fruit tissue firmness. Ardebil 2 (23.5%) and Givi Kosar (14%) genotypes had the highest and lowest TSS in 2023. The TSS contents, in this study, was higher than those reported by Tatari and Abdollahi (2021). In both years, the highest fruit yield tree-1 was harvested from the quince genotype from the Guilan province. Fruit yield efficiency followed a similar pattern as fruit yield tree-1, and the Guilan genotypes had higher (2.28 times) fruit yield efficiency. References Imrak, B., Kafkas, N.E., Golcu, A.E., Ercisli, S., Yasmin, S., Durul, M.S., Skrovankova, S. and Mlcek, J. 2025. Pomological, biochemical and bioactive characteristics in fruits of quince cultivars grown in Türkiye. Folia Horturae, 37, pp.127-137. DOI: 10.2478/fhort-2025-0011 Ozturk, A., Faizi, Z.A. and Kurt, T. 2022. Performance of some standard quince cultivars under ecological conditions of Bafra, Samsun. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32, pp.320-330. DOI: 10.29133/yyutbd Paunovic, G., Ilic, R., Glisic, I. and Mladenovic, J. 2025. Evaluation of physical and chemical properties of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) fruit. Pp. 125-132. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Biotechnology. Čačak, Serbia. DOI: 10.46793/SBT30.17GP Tatari, M. and Abdollahi, H. 2021. Evaluation of vegetative and reproductive characteristics of some quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) genotypes from central regions of Iran. International Journal of Fruit Science, 21, pp.945-954. DOI: 10.1080/15538362.2021.1948377 | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Quince, fruit weight, fruit yield tree-1, fruit yield efficiency, total soluble solids | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alipour, M., Abdollahi, H., Abdousi, V., Ghasemi, A., Adli, M. and Mohamadi, M. 2014. Evaluation of vegetative and reproductive characteristics and distinctness of some quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) genotypes from different regions of Iran. Seed Plant Improvement Journal, 30, pp.507-529 (in Persian). DOI: 10.22092/spij.2017.111226
Atashkar, D., Pyrayesh, A., Dodangh Balakhani, M. and Taghizadeh, A. 2021. Evaluation of vegetative and reproductive characteristics of DAT1 a mid-season apple compared to some apple cultivars grafted on different rootstocks. Journal of Crops Improvement, 23, pp.199-210 (in Persian). DOI: 10.22059/jci.2020.300539.2377
Bolat, I. and Ikinci, A. 2015. The performance of Esme quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) variety in the GAP region. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 19, pp.16-23.
FAO. 2023. Faostat. WWW. Faostat.fao.org.
Gercekcioglu, R., Gencer, S. and Oz, O. 2014. Vegetative and pomological properties of “Eşme” and “Lemon” quince (Cydonia vulgaris L.) varieties grown in Tokat ecology. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 7, pp.1-5.
Hamadziripi, E.T., Theron, K.I., Muller, M. and Steyn, W.J. 2014. Apple compositional and peel color differences resulting from canopy microclimate affect consumer preference for eating quality and appearance. Horticultural Science, 49, pp.384-392. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.49.3.384
Henareh, M., Abdollahi, H. and Akbari, H. 2024. Effect of two quince and hawthorn seedling rootstocks on growth and bearing of (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) promising genotypes and new cultivars under Urmia environmental conditions in Iran. Seed and Plant, 40, pp.171-192 (in Persian). DOI: 10.22092/spj.2025.368391.1403s
Ilhan, G. 2023. Morphological, biochemical and health promoting properties in seed propagated quince fruits found in Çoruh Valley in Türkiye. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, 7, pp.718-724, DOI: 10.31015/ jaefs. 2023.3.25
Imrak, B., Kafkas, N.E., Golcu, A.E., Ercisli, S., Yasmin, S., Durul, M.S., Skrovankova, S. and Mlcek, J. 2025. Pomological, biochemical and bioactive characteristics in fruits of quince cultivars grown in Türkiye. Folia Horturae, 37, pp.127-137. DOI: 10.2478/fhort-2025-0011
Koc, A. and Keles, H. 2018. Quince pre-selection in the Karanlıkdere valley of Yozgat province. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, pp.23-29. DOI: 10.13002/jafag4480
Mir, S.A., Wani, S.M., Wani, T.A., Ahmad, M., Gani, A., Masoodi, F.A. and Nazir, A. 2016. Comparative evaluation of the proximate composition and antioxidant properties of processed products of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.). International Food Research Journal, 23, pp.816-821. DOI: 10.308-48/PJB2025-4(35)
Mokhtar, O.S., Abdel-Rahman, A.S. and El-Khayat, R.M. 2025. Effect of organic and bio-fertilization on promoting vegetative growth of pear seedling cv. (Basateen MKM) under intensive cultivars conditions. Horticulture Research Journal, 3, pp.24-39. DOI: 10.21608/hrj.2025.440420
Morariu, P., Muresan, A.E., Sestras, A. F., Tanislav, A.E., Catalina, D., Maresi, E., Madalina, M., Muresan, V. and Sestras, R.E. 2025. A comprehensive morphological, biochemical, and sensory study of traditional and modern apple cultivars. Horticulturae, 11, pp. 264. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae11030264
Nyeki, J., Soltesz, M. and Szabo, Z. 2003. Quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.). Pp.333-340. In: Kozma, P., Nyeki, J., Soltesz, M. and Szabo, Z. (eds.) Floral Biology, Pollination And Fertilisation In Temperate Zone Fruit Species And Grape. Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado.
Ozturk, A., Faizi, Z.A. and Kurt, T. 2022. Performance of some standard quince cultivars under ecological conditions of Bafra, Samsun. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32, pp.320-330. DOI: 10.29133/yyutbd
Paunovic, G., Ilic, R., Glisic, I. and Mladenovic, J. 2025. Evaluation of physical and chemical properties of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) fruit. Pp. 125-132. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Biotechnology. Čačak, Serbia. DOI: 10.46793/SBT30.17GP
Pinar, H., Kaymak, S., Ozongun, S., Uzun, A., Unlu, M., Bircan, M., Ercisli, S. and Orhan, E. 2016. Morphological and molecular characterization of major quince cultivars from Turkey. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 44, pp.72-76. DOI: 10.15835/nbha44110228
Polat, A.A. 2021. Using of hawthorn as rootstock in loquat cultivation. Pp. 127-131. In: Proceedings of III. International Agricultural, Biological and Life Science Conference, Edirne, Turkey.
Radovic, A., Nikolic, D., Milatovic, D., Durovic, D. and Dordevic, B. 2015. Fruit characteristics of quince varieties in the Belgrade. Vocarstvo, 49, pp.189-190.
Radovic, A., Nikolic, D., Milatovic, D., Rakonjac, V. and Bakic, I. 2016. Growth and yield characteristics of quince cultivars. Acta Horticulture, 1139, pp.209-212. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1139.36
Rasheed, M., Hussain, I., Rafiq, S., Hayat, I., Qayyum, A., Ishaq, S. and Awan, M.S. 2018. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of quince fruit pulp collected from different locations. International Journal of Food Properties, 21, pp.2320-2327. DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2018.1514631
Rodriguez-Guisado, I., Hernandez, F., Melgarejo, P., Legua, P., Martinez, R. and Martinez, J. 2009. Chemical, morphological and organoleptical characterisation of five Spanish quince tree clones (Cydonia oblonga Miller). Scientia Horticulturae, 122, pp.491-496. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.06.004
Rop, O., Balik, J., Reznicek, V., Jurikova, T., Skardova, P., Salas, P., Sochor, J., Mlcek, J. and Kramarova, D. 2011. Chemical characteristics of fruits of some selected quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) cultivars. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 29, pp.65-73. DOI: 10.17221/212/2009-CJFS
Tatari, M. 2023a. Effect of self- and cross-pollination on fruit set and other characteristics of 'Isfahan' quince cultivar. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 25, pp.941-952. DOI: 10.22034/jast.25.4.12
Tatari, M. 2023b. Postharvest quality of new quince cultivar and promising genotype (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) in response to harvesting time and length of the cold storage period. Journal of Horticulture and Postharvest Research, 6, pp.1-14. DOI: 10.22077/jhpr.2022.4875.1254
Tatari, M. and Abdollahi, H. 2021. Evaluation of vegetative and reproductive characteristics of some quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) genotypes from central regions of Iran. International Journal of Fruit Science, 21, pp.945-954. DOI: 10.1080/15538362.2021.1948377
Uzun, A., Cil, A., Yaman, M. and Coskun, O.F. 2020. Genetic diversity and some fruit characteristics of quince genotypes collected from Kayseri region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 8, pp.318-323. DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v8i2.318-323.3012
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 5 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3 |
||