| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,086 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,441 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 48,893,103 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 79,341,966 |
بررسی جوانه‌زنی و فنولوژی علف‌هرز سس (Cuscuta campestris) در مزارع چغندرقند (Beta vulgaris) | ||
| دانش علف‌های هرز ایران | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 11، شماره 2، دی 1394، صفحه 129-143 اصل مقاله (890.8 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ناصر جعفر زاده1؛ علیرضا پیرزاد* 2؛ هاشم هادی2؛ محمدعلی باغستانی3؛ رامین ملکی4 | ||
| 1مرکز تحقیقات ارومیه | ||
| 2دانشگاه ارومیه | ||
| 3موسسه تحقیقات گیاهپشکی | ||
| 4جهاد دانشگاهی ارومیه | ||
| چکیده | ||
| سس زراعی (Cuscuta campestris) به عنوان علف‌هرز انگل ساقه در سال‌های اخیر خسارت فراوانی به زراعت چغندرقند در استان آذربایجان غربی وارد کرده است. شاخص‌های جوانه‌زنی، اثرات انگل بر رشد و عملکرد چغندرقند و فنولوژی سس در شرایط آزمایشگاه، گلخانه و مزرعه در سال 1393 در مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی ومنابع طبیعی آذربایجان غربی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. حداکثر جوانه‌زنی (73 تا 76 درصد) سس در دمای 25-30 درجه سانتی‌گراد رخ داد. با افزایش فاصله کشت بین میزبان و انگل از پنج به 15 سانتی‌متر، کاهش 63 درصدی وزن خشک سس و افزایش 4/31 درصدی وزن ریشه چغندرقند مشاهده شد. در فواصل پنج، 10 و 15 سانتی‌متری میزبان و سس، وزن خشک اندام‌های هوایی چغندرقند نسبت به شاهد بدون سس به ترتیب 38، 29 و 3/12 درصد کاهش یافت. پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که چرخه زندگی سس زراعی از کاشت بذر تا تولید بذر طی چهار مرحله رشدی، از مرحله سبز شدن شروع شده و با کسب 9/716 درجه – روز رشد به حیات خود ادامه داد. گل‌دهی طولانی‌ترین (473 درجه– روز رشد) و سبز شدن کوتاه‌ترین ( 95 درجه - روز رشد) مراحل رشدی سس زراعی بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تولید بذر؛ جوانه‌زنی؛ درجه – روز رشد؛ میزبان؛ علف‌هرز انگل | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Survey of Germination and Phenology of Dodder (Cuscuta campestris) in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Fields | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Field dodder (C. campestris), as an obligate stem parasite, damages sugar beet fields of west Azarbaijan province severely. In this research, we evaluated germination indices and parasitic effects of field dodder on sugar beet yield under laboratory, greenhouse and field conditions in West Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center during 2014. Results showed that maximum germination percent (73 to 76 %) occurred at 25-30 ºC. By increasing the planting distance from 5 to 15 cm between sugar beet and dodder plants, dry weight of dodder reduced by 63% and root weight of sugar beet increased by 31.4 %. The dry shoot weight of sugar beets that were surrounded with dodder whitin 5, 10, and 15 cm distance as compared to sugar beet that were surrounded with no dodder (control) reduced by 38, 29, and 12.3%, respectively. Results also showed that field dodder life cycle, from seed to seed needed 716.9 growth degree-days. Finally, the flowering (473growth degree-days) and germination (95growth degree-days) periods were identified as the longest and lowest growing stage respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Degree- day growth, Germination, host, parasite, seed production | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Albert, M., Belastegui-Macadam, X., Bleischwitz, M. and Kaldenhoff, R. 2008. Cuscuta spp.: Parasitic plants in the spotlight of plant physiology, economy, Ecology. Prog. Bot. 69: 267-277. Aleebrahim, M.T., Migani, F., Rashedmohassel, M.H. and Baghestani, M.A. 2009. Study of phenology in Russian Knapweed (Acroptilon repens) based on growing day degree. Appl. Entomol. Phyt. Pathol. 2: 119-136. (In Persian with English summary). Amirmoradi, S., Rezvani, M.P. and Abdollahian-Nogabi, M. 2010. Effect of dodder on yield quality characteristics of sugar beet in Chenaran conditions. Iran. J. Field Crop Res. 8: 965-974. (In Persian with English Summary). Ashigh, J. and Marquez, E.E. 2010. Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) Biology and Management.Guide A-615. Department of Extension Plant Sciences, New Mexico State University. Benvenuti, S., Dinelli, G., Bonetti, A. and Catizone, P. 2005. Germination, Ecology, emergence and host detection in Cuscuta campestris. Weed Res. 45: 270-278. Bert, A.M., Satin, G., Baldoni, A.M., Delpino, A. Frrero, P., Montemurron, M., Tel, F., Viggiani, P. and Zanin, G. 2006. Relationship between crop yield and weed time of emergence removal modeling and parameter stability. Weed Res. 48: 378-388. Bonhome, R. 2000. Bases and limits to using degree day units. Eur. J. Agron. 13: 1-10. Chauhan, B.S. and Johnson, D.F. 2008. Seed germination and seedling emergence of giant sensitive plant (Mimosa invisa). Weed Sci. 54: 891-897. Costea, M. and Tardif, F. J. 2006. The biology of Canadian weeds. 133. Cuscuta campestris Yuncker, C. gronorii willd. Exschult, C. umbrosa Beyr. Exhook., C. epithymum (L.) and C. epilinum Weihe. Can. J. Plant Sci. 86: 293-316, Ebrahimi, E., Eslami, S.V., Jami Al-Ahmadi, M. and Mahmoodi, S. 2011. Study the effect of different environmental factors on germination of (Ceratocarpus arenarius L. Bluk) seed. Iran. J. Weed Sci. 7: 45-57. (In Persian with English Summary). Fallahpour, F., Kocheki, A.R., Mallatii, M.N. and Rasttegar, M.F. 2013. Study resistance of sugar beet cultivar to field dodder. Iran. J. Field Crop Res. 11: 208-214. (In Persian with English summary). Ganbari, A., Afshari, M. and Mijani, S. 2012. Effect of drought and salinary stress on emergence of field dodder. Iran. J. Field Crop Res. 10: 311-320. (In Persian with English summary). Goldwasser, Y., Lanini, W.T. and Wrobel, R.L. 2001. Tolerance of tomato varieties to lespedeza dodder. Weed Sci. 49: 520–523. Hashem, A. 2005. Biology and management of dodder- a new threat to the canola industry. Available online: http://www.australianoilseeds.com/data/assets. Hutchison, J.M. and Ashton, F.M. 1980. Germination of field dodder (Cuscuta campestris). Weed Sci. 28: 330-337. Irum, M., Khokhar, I. and Mushtaq, S. 2011. Cuscuta campestris Yunck., a new pest of Capsicum frutescens L. (Hot chilli) in Lahor- Pakistan. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 17: 103-110. ISTA. 1999. International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol. 27: 50-52. Krsmanovic, M., Bozic, D., Pavlovic, D., Radivojevic, L. and Vrbnicanin, S. 2013. Temperature effects on Cuscuta campestris Yunk. Seed germination. Pesticphtyomed. 28(3): 187-193. Lanini, W.T. and Kogan, M. 2005. Biology and management of Cuscuta in crops. Cien. Inv. Agric. 32: 127-141. Lyshed, B.O. 1992. Studies of mature seeds of Cuscuta pedicellata and C. campestris by electron microscopy. Ann. Bot. 69: 365-371. Mabberly, D.J. 2008. The plant- book, 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, New York. 385 Maddah, M.B. 1976. Growth of dodder on alfalfa fields in Varamin. Plant Pathol. 12: 151-156. (In Persian with English summary). Mazaheri, D. and Majnonhossini, N. 2001. Agronomy fundamental. Tehran university Press. 320 Pp. (In Persian with English Summary ). Menan, H. and Ngouajio, M. 2006. Effect of alternative management systems on weed populations in hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). Crop Prot. 25: 835-841. Mishra, J.S. 2009. Biology and management of Cuscuta species. Indian J. Weed Sci. 41: 1-11. Mosavi, M.R. 2010. Weed control (Principle and Methods). Marze Danesh Press.470 Pp. (In Persian with English Summary). Mosavi, M.R.F. and Shimi, P. 1997. Parasitic weed of world. (Biology and Control). Varamin Azad university. 396 Pp. Marambe, B., Wigesundara, S., Tennekoon, K., Pindeniya, D.and Jayasinhhe, C. 2002. Growth and development of Cuscuta chinensis Lam. and its impact on selected crops. Weed Biol. & Manag. 2: 79-83. Nazari, J., Rahimian, H., Alizadeh, H. and Mousavi, S.K. 2011. Comparative phenology and damage of Ground cherry (Physalis divaricata L.) on sugar beet crop. Iran. J. Weed Sci. 7: 1-12. Parker, C. 2012. Parasitic weeds a world challenge. Weed Sci. 60:269-276. (In Persian with English summary). Qasem, J.R. 2011. Parasitic flowering plants of woody species in Jordan. Eur. J. Plant Path. 131: 143-155. Salimi, H. and Shahraeen, N. 2000. A study on comparison of seed dormancy and germination in three species of dodder. Rostaniha. 1: 87-101. (In Persian with English Summary). Sandler, H.A. 2010. Managing cuscuta gronovii (Swamp dodder) in Cranberry requires an integrated approach. Sustainability. 2: 660-683. Schimpf, D.J., Flint, S.D. and Palmblad, I.G. 1997. Representation of germination curves with the logistic function. Ann. Bot. 41: 1375-1360. Sharifi, P., Fadakar, F. and Mahdavi, V. 2013. Chemical control of dodder (cuscuta spp.) in the sugar beet fields. Technol. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 3: 3502-3505. Sohrabi, M., Ghalavand, A., Rahimian, H. and Fotuhi, K. 2001. Chemical control of dodder (Cuscuta campestrirs) in sugar beet and evaluation of phytotoxicity effects on wheat in rotation. Iran. J. Crop Sci. 3: 26-33. (In Persian with English summary). Stojsin, V., Maric, A. and Jocic, B. 1991. Harmfulness of Cuscuta campestris Yunck. On sugar beet under varying mineral nutrition. Zastitabilja, 42: 353-363. Tanase, M. and Moise, C. 2012. Dodder (Cuscuta spp.): Skin repose, seed germination and pre- parasitic life. J. Hortic. For. Bio. 16: 89-92. Toth, P. Tancik, J. and Cagan, L. 2006. Distribution and harmfulness of field dodder (Cuacuta campestris Yuncker) at sugar beet fields in Slavakia. Nat. Sci. Matica.110: 179-185. Zand, E. Baghestani, M.A., Nezamabadi, N. and Shimi, P. 2012. Important weeds and herbicide of Iran. Jahad-e Daneshgahi Mashad.176 Pp. (In Persian with English summary). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,514 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,400 |
||