Related Links
Determination of evapotranspiration and crop coefficient (kc) of sugar beet using lysimeter and comparing it with experimental methods in Shahrekord | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| Article 4, Volume 30, Issue 1, June 2014, Pages 58-41 PDF (329.72 K) | ||
| Document Type: Scientific - Research | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/jsb.2014.5854 | ||
| Authors | ||
| N.A. Ebrahimipak* 1; S. Ghalebi2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor of Soil Physics ,Soil and Water Research Institute, Iran | ||
| 2Irrigation Research ,Soil and Water Research Institute, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This study aimed at determining the evapotranspiration and crop coefficient (kc) of sugar beet during the plant growth using drainage lysimeter by using water balance and experimental methods for three years in Shahrekord. After sugar beet planting and out of lysimeter, evapotranspiration was measured weekly and monthly by measuring the factors of the water- balance equation. Results showed that the total evapotranspiration of sugar beet was 1016.6 mm during the growing season and the rate of water drainage and the soil moisture content were 73.9 and 66.1 mm, respectively. The amount of evaporation from class A pan was 1364.5 mm. Evapotranspiration of the reference plant was measured by using drainage lysimeter and estimated by using the experimental methods. Rusults showed that the evapotranspiration rate of the reference plant was 1123.03 mm and among the experimental methods, the Blaney- Criddle FAO24 and Penman-Monteith FAO 56 method had more accuracy. Crop coefficient at early stage, development stage, middle stage, and final stage was 0.72, 0.81, 1.04, and 0.7 with an average of 0.89 for the whole growing period of sugar beet. The average pan evaporation coefficient (Kp) was 0.83, and the average water requirement coefficient (Kc.p) was 0.73 for the growing season of sugar beet. In other words, sugar beet water requirement was 0.73 of the evaporation from the evaporation pan, and by having the amount of evaporation from the pan, one can estimate the under requirement of the crop with an acceptable accuracy. Water use efficiency for root and white sugar was 5.14 and 0.753 kg m-3, respectively. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Evaporation from class A pan; pan coefficient; Reference crop; Water requirement coefficient | ||
|
Supplementary Files
|
||
| References | ||
|
Aghdaie M, Fyzee M. Determining evapotranspiration of sugar beet plants in lysimeters having method in Esfahan, Proceedings of the Eighth Seminar on Irrigation and reducing evaporation of Kerman. 2000. p 27.(in Persian, abstract in English) Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. Crop evapotranspiration- Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper; 1998. No. 56, FAO, Rome, Italy. Barbier G. Effect of irrigation and harvesting dates on the yield of spring, sown sugar beet; Agricultural Water Management 1982; 5(4); 354-357. Caliandro A, Tarantion E, Rubino P. Water consumption of sugar beet sown in the spring under the environmental conditions of southern ltaly: Rivista di Agronomia. 1990; 14(3); 178-193. Chegini MA, Rezaei-rad B, Ghalebi S. Determination of crop transpiration coefficient (Kc) at various growth stages of sugar beet. Plant Ecophysiology. 2010; 2: 31-36Dehghanisanij H, Yamamoto T, Rasiah V. Assessment of evapotranspiration estimation models for use in semi-arid environments. Agricultural Water Management. 2004; 64:91-106. Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. Yield response to water. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33. Rome. 1979; 193 pp. Ebrahimipak NA. Determining evapotranspiration potential reference crop (grass) with method lysimeters having and compared with experimental methods in Shahrekord, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran, No. 40235, Soil and Water Research Institute Publisher. 2012; 105P. (in Persian, abstract in English) Ebrahimipak NA. Determining evapotranspiration of sugar beet plants in lysimeters having method in Shahrekord, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran, No. 89.909, Soil and Water Research Institute Publisher. 2011; 65P.(in Persian, abstract in English) Godratnema G. Corp coefficient to estimate the optimum water requirements of plants, Workshop on, applied approach to the management of irrigation water deficit; 2003. (in Persian) Hang AN, Miller DE. Yield and physiological responses of potatoes to deficit, high frequency sprinkler irrigation. Agronomy Journal, Madison. 1986; 78:436-440 Hargreaves GH, Allen RG. History and evaluation of Hargreaves evpotranspiration equation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 2003; 29(1):53-63. Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG. Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice. 1990; No. 70, 332 pp. Kassam A, Smith M. AEO methodologies on crop water use and crop water productivity. 2001. ww.fao.org/AG/AGL/aglw/crop water/docs/mehod.pdf Khajehnouri A. Determining evapotranspiration of sugar beet plants in lysimeters having method in Karaj, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran, Water Research Institute Publisher. 1993; 35P. (in Persian) Kochki AR. Agronomy Sugar beet: Translating Jihad Mashhad University publisher. 1997. (in Persian) Legoupil JC. Water requirement of crops in the upper chelif reign: semaine. d’ Etude des problems mediterraneensi, 13-17 sept 1971. 1972; 254-265. Mirzaei MR, Rezvani SM. Effect of deficit irrigation levels at four growth stages on yield and quality of sugar beet. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 2012;14(2):94-107. (in Persian, abstract in English). Mirzaei MR, Abdollahian-Noghabi M. Study of sugar beet growth pattern in Hamedan, Iran. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2012; 27(2): 1-9. (in Persian, abstract in English) Mdahyan H, Farzamnia M. Determining evapotranspiration potential reference crop (grass) with method lysimeters having in Yazd, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran, No. 83.714, Soil and Water Research Institute Publisher. 2005. (in Persian, abstract in English) Nielsen DC, Hinkle SE. Field evaluation of basal crop coefficints for corn based on growing degree day, growth stage or time. Transaction of the ASAE. 1996; 39 (1):97-103 Panahi M, Aghdaie M, Rezaei M. Determination of sugar beet standard evapotranspiration by lysimeter method in Kabotar-Abad, Esfahan, Iran. Journal of Sugar beet. 2007; 22(1): 37-25. (in Persian, abstract in English) Pruitt WO, Fereres E, Kaita K, Snyder RL. Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for California. Agriculture and Experiment Station Bulletin 1922, University of California. 1987;16 pp. and 12 maps. Rahimi MB. Determining evapotranspiration of sugar beet plants in lysimeters having method in Hamadan, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran, Water Research Institute Publisher. 1998; P30. (in Persian) Rahimian MH, Shahabifar M. Determination of water requirement of sugar beet by means of lysimeters having in Mashhad, Journal of Sugar beet. 2008; 23 (2): 184-177. (in Persian, abstract in English) Rahimian MH. Determining evapotranspiration of sugar beet plants in lysimeters having method and related crop coefficient In Mashhad, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran, Water Research Institute Publisher. 2003; P35. (in Persian) Razavi R. Determining evapotranspiration potential reference crop (grass) with method lysimeters having in Orumieh, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran, 2002; No. 80.409, Soil and Water Research Institute Publisher. (in Persian, abstract in English) Razavi R. Determining evapotranspiration of sugar beet plants in lysimeters having method in Orumieh, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran. 1996; No. 74.456, Soil and Water Research Institute Publisher. (in Persian, abstract in English) Roth D, Gunther R. Comparison of measured and estimated potential evapotranspiration : zeitschrift Fur Kulturtechink and landen twickluy: 1992, 33(1): 13-22. Sarami M. Determining evapotranspiration potential reference crop (grass) with method lysimeters having, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran. 2004; No. 82.607, Soil and Water Research Institute Publisher. (in Persian, abstract in English) Soltani K. Determining evapotranspiration potential reference crop (grass) with method lysimeters having, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran. 2000; No. 78.41, Soil and Water Research Institute Publisher. (in Persian, abstract in English) Star M. Determining evapotranspiration potential reference crop (grass) with method lysimeters having in Esfahan, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran. 1999; No. 77.360, Soil and Water Research Institute Publisher.(in Persian, abstract in English) Synder RL. Crop Coefficient. 2002; http/www.biomet.ucdavis.edu/ATM133/14.Crop Coefficient .pdf Taheri K. Determination of water plants such as forage maize- sugar beet and sunflower area using lysimeters having Bakhtaran, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran. 1983; No. 16, Soil and Water Research Institute Publisher.(in Persian, abstract in English) Trteciechi E. Water demands of winter wheat – spring barley , field’s beans and sugar beet grown on very heavy alluvial soil in the tulawy region of the vistula data: Oddtial tulawski IMUZW Elblayu 80-300; 1992. Urrea LR, Martín de Santa Olalla F, Fabeiro C, Moratalla A. Testing evapotranspiration equations using lysimeter observations in a semiarid climate. Agriculture Water Management. 2006; 85:15-26. Vaziri J. Determination of water potential of sugar beet using lysimeters having, Agricultural Scientific Information and Documentation Centre, Iran, Soil and Water Research Institute Publisher. 1992. (in Persian, abstract in English) Zare Abyaneh H, Farrokhi E, Bayat Varkeshi M, Ahmadi M. Determination of water requirement and the effect of the changes on some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of products of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2012, 27(2): 153-167. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 6,172 PDF Download: 3,627 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb