اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات283
تعداد نشریات سازمان81
تعداد شماره‌ها2,729
تعداد مقالات31,081
تعداد مشاهده مقاله29,058,915
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله16,339,794
درویشی, محسن, شریف‌زاده, محمدشریف, عبدالله‌زاده, غلام‌حسین. (1396). واکاوی نقش شرکت‌های تعاونی روستایی در پیشبرد توسعه پایدار: رویکرد مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 20(3), 43-64. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2017.61251
محسن درویشی; محمدشریف شریف‌زاده; غلام‌حسین عبدالله‌زاده. "واکاوی نقش شرکت‌های تعاونی روستایی در پیشبرد توسعه پایدار: رویکرد مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 20, 3, 1396, 43-64. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2017.61251
درویشی, محسن, شریف‌زاده, محمدشریف, عبدالله‌زاده, غلام‌حسین. (1396). 'واکاوی نقش شرکت‌های تعاونی روستایی در پیشبرد توسعه پایدار: رویکرد مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 20(3), pp. 43-64. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2017.61251
درویشی, محسن, شریف‌زاده, محمدشریف, عبدالله‌زاده, غلام‌حسین. واکاوی نقش شرکت‌های تعاونی روستایی در پیشبرد توسعه پایدار: رویکرد مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1396; 20(3): 43-64. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2017.61251

واکاوی نقش شرکت‌های تعاونی روستایی در پیشبرد توسعه پایدار: رویکرد مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی

روستا و توسعه
مقاله 3، دوره 20، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 79، آذر 1396، صفحه 43-64    اصل مقاله (277.64 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30490/rvt.2017.61251
نویسندگان
محسن درویشی1؛ محمدشریف شریف‌زاده* 2؛ غلام‌حسین عبدالله‌زاده3
1دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد توسعه روستایی، دانشکده مدیریت کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران
2دانشیار ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده مدیریت کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران.
3دانشیار ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده مدیریت کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران
چکیده
هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر بررسی مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی در شرکت‌های تعاونی روستایی شهرستان تهران بود. پژوهش به‌صورت پیمایشی انجام شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش را 6435 نفر از اعضای تعاونی‌های روستایی شهرستان تهران تشکیل می‌دادند. حجم نمونه با استفاده از رابطه کوکران 237 نفر تعیین شد. پرسشنامه بر اساس نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌بندی‌شده با انتساب متناسب و به‌صورت تصادفی در اختیار اعضای تعاونی‌های روستایی مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. روایی صوری پرسشنامه از سوی گروهی از کارشناسان و پایایی آن با استفاده از آزمون آلفای کرونباخ (89/0=α) تأیید شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که از دیدگاه بیشتر پاسخ‏گویان (۴۹/۳ درصد)، مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی شرکت‌های تعاونی روستایی در سطح خیلی کم تا کم است؛ همچنین، نُه عامل حاصل از تحلیل عاملی مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی روی‌هم‌‏رفته 710/62 درصد از کل واریانس مجموعه را تبیین می‌کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی؛ شرکت‌های تعاونی روستایی؛ تهران (شهرستان)
عنوان مقاله [English]
Analyzing the Role of Rural Cooperatives in Sustainable Development: Corporate Social Responsibility Approach
نویسندگان [English]
Mohsen DARVISHI1؛ Mohammad Sharif SHARIFZADEH2؛ Gholam Hossein ABDOLLAHZADEH3
1MSc Graduate in Rural Development, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
2Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
3Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
چکیده [English]
This study aimed mainly at investigating the corporate social responsibility of rural cooperatives in Tehran County. The statistical population of the study consisted of the 6435 members of the rural cooperatives in Tehran. The sample size was determined based on the Cochran formula, 237. According to the categorized sampling with probability proportionate and randomization, a questionnaire was prepared and distributed among the rural cooperative members to be studied. The formal validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed by an expert group using the Cronbach's alpha (α= 0.89). According to the study results, most respondents (49.3 percent) assessed the social responsibility of the rural cooperatives to be at very low to low levels. Nine factors resulting from the factor analysis of corporate social responsibility included “the environmental protection trend”, “participation in community development”, “participation in the development of business environment”, “inclusion criteria and legalism in management”, “supply management”, “human resource management”, “customer orientation”, “localism” and “transparent communication”; these factors altogether explained 62.710 percent of the total variance of the corporate social responsibility aspects.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
corporate social responsibility, Rural Cooperatives, Tehran (County)
مراجع
  1. Astara, O.H., Mitoula, R. and Theodoropoulou, E. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: a marketing tool and/or a factor for the promotion of sustainable development for companies? An empirical examination of listed companies in the Athens Stock Exchange. International Journal of Strategic Innovative Marketing, 2(1):17-33.
  2. Aupperle, K.E., Carroll, A.B. and Hatfield, J.D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2): 446-463.
  3. Azari, L., Houshmand, M. and Naghavi, S. (2009). Measuring satisfaction from the activities of border settlers' cooperatives in Khorasan Razavi province of Iran. Village and Development, 12(2): 87-111. (Persian)
  4. Barati Marnami, A., Sajadi, H. and Keivanara, M. (2011). Social responsibility in hospitals of Isfahan city. Journal of Payavard Salamat, 5(1): 10-23. (Persian)
  5. Baratloo, F. (2009). Corporate social responsibility. Rahbord Journal, 43: 93-108. (Persian)
  6. Barzegar, G., Oskou, V. and Takor, R. (2016). The relationship between ownership structure and corporate social responsibility in companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Iranian Accounting Review, 3(11): 21-44. (Persian)
  7. Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. New York: Harper and Brothers.
  8. Buckley, C.A. and Waring, M.J. (2013). Using diagrams to support the research process: examples from grounded theory. Qualitative Research, 13(2): 148-172.
  9. Carroll, B. and Archie, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4): 39-48.
  10.  Chatterji, A.K., Levine, D.I. and Toffel, M.W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18: 125-169.
  11.  Clark, C.E. (2000). Differences between public relations and corporate social responsibility: an analysis. Public Relations Review, 26: 363-381.
  12.  Daryaei, A., Pakdel, A. and Moshashaee, S.M. (2013). Sustainable development, product of green accounting and marketing and social responsibility with emphasis on corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Science and Research, 32: 28-33. (Persian)
  13.  Firouzabadi, S. and Hosseini, S. (2011). Analysis of the problems and barriers of the rural cooperatives in agricultural products marketing: case study of rural cooperatives of Koushk Hezar Beyza village, Fars province. Community Development (Rural and Urban Communities), 3(1): 131-148. (Persian)
  14.  Font, X., Walmsley, A., Cogotti, S., Combes, Mc.L. and Hausler, N. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: the disclosure-performance gap. Journal of Tourism Management, 33: 1544-1553.
  15.  Jamali, D. (2007). The case for strategic corporate social responsibility in developing countries. Business and Society Review, 1: 1-27.
  16.  Kavoura, A. and Sahinidis, A. (2015). Communicating corporate social responsibility activities in Greece in a period of a prolonged economic crisis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175: 496-502.
  17.  Khajavi, Sh., Bayazidi, A. and Kangarlouei, S. (2011). A study of relationship between profit management and social responsibility of companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting Advances (JAA), 3(1): 29-54. (Persian)
  18.  Mattila, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and image in organizations: for the insiders or the outsiders? Social Responsibility Journal, 5: 540-549.
  19.  McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26: 117-127.
  20.  Melo, T. and Garrido-Mogrado, A. (2012). Corporate reputation: a combination of social responsibility and industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19: 11-31.
  21.  Moeinaddin, M., Sadeghi, G. and Arabsalehi, M. (2013). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance of the firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Empirical Research in Accounting, 3(1): 1-20. (Persian)
  22.  Moshabaki, A. and Khalili Shojaei, V. (2011). Investigating the relationship between organization culture and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Journal of Applied Sociology, 21(4): 37-56. (Persian)
  23.  Oriordan, L. and Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 745-758.
  24.  Perrini, F. (2006). SME and CSR theory: evidence and implications from an Italian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 67: 305-316.
  25.  Philip, L.C. (2007). The evaluation of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 50: 449-454.
  26.  Prior, D., Surroca, J. and Tribo, J. A. (2009). Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earning management and CSR. Journal of Compilation, 16: 161-177.
  27.  Rahmanseresht, H., Rafiei, M. and Kousha, M. (2009). Social responsibility beyond organizational ethics. Journal of Tadbir, 204: 22-26. (Persian)
  28.  Saberifar, D. (2012). Review of the factors affecting on membership and participation of villagers in rural cooperatives, case study: Khorasan Razavi province. Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 2(4): 65-76. (Persian)
  29.  Saiia, D.H., Carroll, A.B. and Buchholtz, A.K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy: when corporate charity begins at home. Business & Society, 42(2): 169-201. 
  30.  Salavati, A., Rostami Noroozabad, M., Rahmani Noroozabad, S. and Baghbanian, M. (2015). Factors affecting social responsibility in rural cooperatives of Sanandaj and Kamyaran counties. Cooperation and Agriculture, 3(12): 157-177. (Persian)
  31.  Salehi Omran, E., Sabeti, A. and Hasanzadeh, S. (2012). A study of the importance of corporate social responsibility indicators in industrial centers and universities. Journal of Iranian Higher Education, 4(2): 1-36. (Persian)
  32.  Samy, M., Odemilin, G. and Bampton, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: a strategy for sustainable business success, an analysis of 20 selected British companies. Corporate Governance, 10(2): 203-217.
  33.  Senoubar, N., Khalili, M. and Saghafian, H. (2012). A study of relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Journal of Management System, 2(4): 28-52. (Persian)
  34.  Scholteus, B. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the international banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 86: 159-175.
  35.  Sharbatoghlie, A., Afshari, D. and Najmi, M. (2011). Social responsibility in corporations listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 4(19): 63-82. (Persian)
  36.  Sharifzadeh, A., Abdolahzadeh, G. and Ghaderzadeh, S. (2014). Influential factors on member's participation in management of rural cooperatives in Gorgan township. Cooperation and Agriculture, 2(8): 1-26. (Persian)
  37.  Stehr, C. and Jakob, B.E. (2014). Corporate social responsibility through voluntary commitment in small and medium sized enterprises– the case of the 'Heilbronn Declaration'. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(4): 135-150.
  38.  Tah Hsu, K. (2012). The advertising effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and brand equity, evidence from the life insurance industry in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2): 189-201.
  39.  Weihrich, H. and Koontz, H. (1993). Management: a global perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  40.  Zhu, D. and Tan, K.L. (2008). Issues and challenges of CSR practices in textile industry: an empirical study in Suzhou, China. Management and Enterprise Development Journal, 5: 759-772.
  41.  Zolfaghari, M. (2012). Social responsibility, commitment to benefit. Journal of Agro-industry, 146: 23-25. (Persian)
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 623
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 346


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب