Rismanbaf, S., marashi, S., babaeinejad, T. (2023). Effect of Soil Moisture and Type of Tillage and Sowing Machinery on Yield and Yield Components of Wheat in Saline Soils of Mahshahr, Iran. , 37(3), 229-242. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2023.362714.712
Sepideh Rismanbaf; seyed keyvan marashi; teimour babaeinejad. "Effect of Soil Moisture and Type of Tillage and Sowing Machinery on Yield and Yield Components of Wheat in Saline Soils of Mahshahr, Iran". , 37, 3, 2023, 229-242. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2023.362714.712
Rismanbaf, S., marashi, S., babaeinejad, T. (2023). 'Effect of Soil Moisture and Type of Tillage and Sowing Machinery on Yield and Yield Components of Wheat in Saline Soils of Mahshahr, Iran', , 37(3), pp. 229-242. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2023.362714.712
Rismanbaf, S., marashi, S., babaeinejad, T. Effect of Soil Moisture and Type of Tillage and Sowing Machinery on Yield and Yield Components of Wheat in Saline Soils of Mahshahr, Iran. , 2023; 37(3): 229-242. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2023.362714.712

Effect of Soil Moisture and Type of Tillage and Sowing Machinery on Yield and Yield Components of Wheat in Saline Soils of Mahshahr, Iran

پژوهش های خاک
Article 3, Volume 37, Issue 3, December 2023, Pages 229-242    PDF (776.7 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22092/ijsr.2023.362714.712
Authors
Sepideh Rismanbaf1; seyed keyvan marashi* 2; teimour babaeinejad3
1M.S. of Agronomy, Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
3Assistant Professor, Department of Soil science, Ahvaz branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of soil moisture and tillage and sowing machinery on yield and yield components of wheat in the saline soils of Mahshahr, Iran. The experiment was carried out as a split-plot according to a randomized complete block design with three replications. Independent variables included soil moisture during tillage at three levels of 10%, 15%, and 20% as the main factor. Sub-factor included the type of tillage and sowing machinery at four levels including 1) without the use of chisel-piler and sowing with flat seeder machine, 2) without the use of chisel-piler and sowing with furrow seeder machine, 3) one time use of chisel-piler to a depth of 20 cm and sowing with flat seeder machine, and 4) one time use of chisel-piler to a depth of 20 cm and sowing with furrow seeder machine. In order to prepare the land, irrigation was done before tillage according to the region's customs to reduce the tensile strength of the soil against tillage machines. After the soil moisture was suitable according to the main factors, the tillage was done with a 24-bladed disk machine once to a depth of 15 cm. The maximum clod weight was obtained in the condition of not using a chisel-piler and soil moisture of 20%, and the lowest was obtained in using a chisel-piler and soil moisture of 10%. The maximum number of tiller/plant, number of spikes/m2, number of spikelet/spike, number of grain/spike, number of grain/spikelet, biological yield, and grain yield was under using chisel-piler and sowing with furrow seeder machine with 20% soil moisture, and the lowest in the treatment with no chisel-piler and sowing with flat seeder machine. In general, the results showed that the use of chisel-piler and sowing with furrow seeder machine under 20% soil moisture had the best results in terms of grain formation and yield in saline soils, which can be suggested to reduce the effects of salinity.
Keywords
Chisel; Flat seeder machine; Furrow seeder machine; Soil salinity
References
  1. Barati, M., Majidi, M. M., Mirlohi, A., Pirnajmodini, F., and N. Sharif-Moghaddam. Response of cultivated and wild barley germplasm to drought stress at different developmental stages. Crop Sci. 55: 2668-2681.
  2. Choudhary, M. R., Munir, A. and S. Mahmood. 2008. Field soil salinity distribution under furrow-bed and furrow-ridge during production in irrigated environment. Pakistan J. Water Resour. 12(2): 33-40.
  3. Cuevas, J., Daliakopoulos, I. N., Moral, F. D., Hueso, J., and I. Tsanis. A review of soil-improving cropping systems for soil salinization. Agronomy, 9(295): 1-22.
  4. Devkota, M., Gupta, R. K., Martius, C., Lamers, J. P. A., Devkota, K. P., Sayre, K.D., and P.L.G. Vlek. 2015. Soil salinity management on raised beds with different furrow irrigation modes in salt-affected lands. Agric. Water Manag.152: 243-250.
  5. Dong, H., Kong, X., Luo, Z., Li, W., and C. Xin. 2010. Unequal salt distribution in the root zone increases growth and yield of cotton. Eur. J. Agron. 33(4): 285-292.
  6. Elias Azar, K.H. 2002. Correction of saline and sodium soils (soil and water management). West Azerbaijan Academic Jihad Publications, Urmia University, 330 pages.
  7. Fahong, W., Xuqing, W., and K. Sayre. 2004 Comparison of conventional, flood irrigated, flat planting with furrow irrigated, raised bed planting for winter wheat in China. Crops. Res. 87: 35-42.
  8. Ghogdi, E.A., Darbandi, A.I., and A. Borzouei. 2012. Effects of salinity on some physiological traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 5(1): 1906-1906.
  9. Homai, H. 2012. Plant and salt. Forestry and Rangeland Research Publications. Publication number 261. 199 pages.
  10. Jin, Y. H., Zhou, D. W., and S.C. Jiang. 2010. Comparison of soil water content and corn yield in furrow and conventional ridge sown systems in a semiarid region of China. Agric. Water Manag. 97(2): 326-332.
  11. Kalteh, M., Ajam Norouzi, H., Faraji, A., Haghighi, A.A., and E. Gholamalipour Alamdari. 2022. Investigation of the effect of plant density and humic acid on paddy yield, water use efficiency, and biochemical traits of direct-seeded rice cultivation (Oryza sativa L.) in northern Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 65(3): 140-151.
  12. Molden, D., Murray-Rust, H., Sakthivadivel, R., and I. Makin. 2013. A water-productivity framework for understanding and action, in Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement, CABI Publishing in Association with International Water Management Institute, Vol. 1, Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series, Wallingford, UK.
  13. Moreno-Sotomayor, A., and A. Weiss. 2004. Improvements in the simulation of kernel number and grain yield in CERES-Wheat. Field Crops Res. 88: 157-169.
  14. Shabani, A., Sepaskhah, A. H., and A.A. Kamgar-Haghighi. 2013. Responses of agronomic components of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) as influenced by deficit irrigation, water salinity and planting method. Int J Plant Prod. 7(2): 313-340.
  15. Sikander, K., Hussain, I., Sohail, M., Kissana, N. S., and S.G. Abbas. 2003. Effect of different planting methods on yield components of wheat. Asian J Plant Sci. 2(10): 811-813.
  16. Wang, G. Y., Han, Y. Y., Zhou, X. B., Chen, Y. H., and Z. Ouyang. 2014. Planting pattern and irrigation effects on water use efficiency of winter wheat. Crop Sci. 54(3): 1166–1174.
  17. Zhang, H., Turner, N. C., and M.L. Poole, 2010. Sourcesink balance and manipulating sink-source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sinklimited in high-rainfall zones. Crop Pasture Sci. 61: 852-861.
Statistics
Article View: 134
PDF Download: 181


counter
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb